Link from the Void

Sup?

About Aardwolf (MUD)...

Hey, James, I saw your article, and I'm afraid I've proposed it for deletion. The thing is that, as written, the article makes no claims of notability, which is the standard of inclusion for new articles on Wikipedia, and after looking a little bit into it, I don't think there's any realistic prospect of notability, either. The basic minimum criteria for an article is expressed in the general notability guideline, which says that the subject of the article must have significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

The reason that we have this notability guideline is that, on Wikipedia, we need our information to be verifiable through references to reliable sources. Verifiability is the only way we can even have a hope of asserting that our information is accurate. On Wikipedia, our information is only as good as the sources which back it up, and non-notable subjects just don't have enough coverage in reliable sources for us to be able to write anything about them.

Of course, it's possible that I've missed some reliable sources that discuss Aardwolf; if I have, then feel free to add them to the article. You can halt the deletion process of the page at any time by removing the {{proposed deletion ... }} at the top of the page. Keep in mind though that there are other deletion processes that the page can go to, so halting the deletion without addressing the underlying issues won't really accomplish much. But if you think you need more time to establish notability, feel free to halt the deletion and go for it.

Finally, let me just say: don't worry about it! Even if the article ends up getting deleted, it's no big deal! Nobody will hold it against you; lots of people have their articles deleted. Wikipedia can be a pretty fun place once you learn the ropes, so don't get discouraged! If you need any help, you can ask me questions on my talk page. An even better place to get questions about Wikipedia answered is the Teahouse, where we hosts would be more than happy to answer any questions you might ask us. Thanks! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

I suggest visiting the tutorial.

Salma Vian (talk) 20:34, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: NOT BEING TROUTED BEFORE

Re: A barnstar for you!

You're most certainly welcome James! Thank you for your kind words, my new barnstar, and your note of appreciation. I personally tend to think of reference formatting as a rather minor type of edit, but according to the docs, they really shouldn't be marked as such. The article you mention was an easy one, but I often incorporate a lot of manual editing in conjunction with Reflinks to get it right... along with other various bits of assorted wikification. If you take a look at the revision history at Chinese Democracy Tour, you'll quickly see how this type of editing can prove to be a real time consuming nightmare on certain articles. Have yourself a great day James, stay well, and happy editing! :)  -- WikHead (talk) 03:29, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

Hi James3167, and thanks for leaving feedback. MLA citations are totally acceptable on Wikipedia, but we don't (to the best of my knowledge) have a citation template for them, so they have to be done manually. If you are familiar the correct format for MLA, feel free to use it accordingly. However, there is no requirement to favour one particular citation style over any other (there's no Wikipedia house style for references), so you are free to use whatever style you see fit to.

Yunshui 雲‍水 10:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juniper's Knot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fiend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cover art for Juniper's Knot.png

Thanks for uploading File:Cover art for Juniper's Knot.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi, I noticed that your signature includes no links, and I just wanted to inform you that your signature is required to have at least one link to your user page, your talk page, and/or your contributions. For information on formatting it, see Wikipedia:How to fix your signature. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 01:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Juniper's Knot

Hello! Your submission of Juniper's Knot at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:38, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Link from the Void; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Cause u said so! ~~Junvfr <~_~> (talk) 23:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Crunch, crunch!

Here are some chips to go with your fish!

a side for you

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Link from the Void. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Link from the Void. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)