Jahsonic

First Choice

Hi, your article First Choice was speedy deleted for no apparent reason. I've listed it on votes for undeletion. Kappa 00:06, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks Jahsonic 00:28, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi to Wayland

Hi User:Wayland, I just found out today, that aside from excellent history of subcultures in the 20th century, you also did the history of literature and alternative society. So you could say I am a fan. Could you check upon some edits I have made on Underground culture and transgressive art, please? Thanks in advance.--Jahsonic 11:03, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

thanks, very useful indeed --Jahsonic 08:19, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

I just rewrote the entry for Underground music and I get the feeling that we need to differentiate between underground culture and underground cultural products. These include underground film, cult movies, underground music and a curiously absent article: cult fiction. In short, all products that develop a cult following. Thanks for your input. and if you have any ideas to start the cult fiction article. I guess it would include such authors as (long list omitted)

• Okay, I haven't had much time to do much editing recently but I did have a little bit of time today. I've created Category:Underground and placed quite a few related articles together in the category so they can be navigated easily. I'm thinking these are all to do with "square pegs in round holes" (or round pegs in square holes) or the relationship between odd individuals and an over-normalising society so the category spans various divisions.

--wayland 17:16, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Just saying hello

I've just stumbled upon your userpage. I've been an admirer of the Jahsonic site for some years. Didn't realise you were a wikipedian too. Cnwb 11:31, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Je me joins à ce message pour vous faire part de mes plus vives félicitations à propos de votre site Jahsonic. C'est une mine d'informations sur beaucoup de sujets. Votre page sur l'histoire de la house music est-elle disponible en français ? Je serais très intéressé par cela. Serait-il possible aussi de crée une page sur le DJ français Laurent Garnier, un grand merci pour ça !!!! Alsop

Un autre site intéressant: http://www.soulwalking.co.uk/

Merci pour les commentaires. I will not at this time translate parts of Jahsonic in French. Feel free to translate the house music yourself, but please credit the original authors. --Jahsonic 12:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Critical Theory

I'm a little bit confused as to why you are editing the content of discussions... Voyager640 15:42, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi Voyager, Yes I see what you mean. I meant no harm. I changed cultural theory to culture theory because of the redirect

--Jahsonic 16:17, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Nanostubs

Hi! Sorry to keep blowing off that article on the French director, but an article about a guy like that needs more than just his birthday. It's pretty useless unless you can tell a lot more about this fellow. - Lucky 6.9 07:39, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

You are referring to the Claude Miller article. I disagree with you. Birthday is where every article starts and I provided the link to the French entry as well. Furthermore, Ludivine Sagnier, Lino Ventura, Patrick Dewaere, Lumière and Company and Elsa Lunghini were incoming links to this page, and for those pages my entry provided real info. Build the web, not just the article. See Wikipedia:Build_the_web. I resent that you deleted an article that I had just begun to edit and which was 2 minutes old. Was my article inaccurate, POV? No. --Jahsonic 07:49, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Your article was neither inaccurate nor POV. It was, however, a speedy deletion candidate for lack of content all three times. If you had put half as much effort into the article as you have defending it here, you wouldn't be taking a 24-hour time out for breaking the three-revert rule. I tried being nice and you jumped down my throat. - Lucky 6.9 09:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

• One friendly suggestion: If you were planning on expanding this anyway, you should have done so on a temporary page, such as the sandbox or your talk page. I'll go ahead and lift the block so that you can expand your work. - Lucky 6.9 09:19, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

• OK, you're unblocked. - Lucky 6.9 09:21, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, but the only page I can edit now is this one, was that your intention? --Jahsonic 12:36, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

This was the article how I had written it:

Claude Miller is a French film director who was born February 20 1942 in Paris. fr:Claude Miller

Mannerism

Hi! at the risk of being dropped from your list of favorite Wikipedians I restored the statement that Mannerism is "one of the few style designations whose label was self-applied." I'm trying to think of others besides Art Nouveau and all the self-conscious self-designations within Modernism. It seems such an unexceptionable statement. Should we discuss it at Talk:Mannerism? --Wetman 20:53, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

• Wetman, no offense taken, I have added an entry at the Mannerism talk page. You are still one of my two favourite Wikipedians. (and you both recently contributed to an article I started: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Modern_novel&action=history)

Deconstruction

Sorry for reverting your edit to this page. It's not exactly wise to remove so much content without giving any reason in your edit summary or discussing it on the talk page. Johnleemk | Talk 19:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

You are, of course, completely right, sorry for not discussing it, the intro to this article, however, reads as pure gibberish. --Jahsonic 19:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Sentiment and the Sentimental

Just a note on the change of sentimental novel to sentiment in Augustan literature: I understand the change, as a red link is annoying, but we (those few folks doing 18th century literature) keep waiting for one of us to break down and attempt an article on the sentimental novel. I know that I'm something like the last person on earth who could do a fair job on it, because I'm a satire fan, and the sentimental novel was one of the drippiest, most insipid things on earth, from my point of view. Bishonen knows the material better, but she likes it not much better than I do. I hope the red link, spread out now across 12 articles or so, will spur someone with training in feminist theory and the novel will jump in. (Generally, the feminist literary historians praise the sentimental novel to some degree, or find it interesting, while unreconstructed old historians and Marxist literary people like me think of it as a sign of mass psychosis.) I'm not going to change the link back, as I really have no objection to the change, but I thought I'd explain why that red link is so prevalent in articles I've been the primary author on (and a little bottle of oil (put in so the sentence doesn't end on a preposition)). Geogre 13:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Vanity

Is this page vanity or not: Mikhail Lebedev --GoOdCoNtEnT 08:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

not my field of expertise --Jahsonic 08:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Rémy Belvaux (I)

Has Rémy Belvaux really passed away? Please cite your sources in the article. --Edcolins 13:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

ooops, cannot confirm for the moment, have reverted Belvaux's page to present tense, I like this from your page "All in all, Wikipedia is a terrific, addictive, Borgesian project..." and your touching the issue of notability. --Jahsonic 13:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

found source [1] --Jahsonic 14:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. --Edcolins 14:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Rémy Belvaux (II)

Thank you for pointing out that IMDB now contains the date of birth of Rémy Belvaux. It wasn't there a couple of days ago... I didn't check again. How do they know that by the way? Is IMDB a kind of wiki? Cheers. --Edcolins 09:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Not a wiki, but edited by humans nevertheless --Jahsonic 10:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Anyway, I have added a footnote. Even if the piece of information is wrong, at least it relies on a (relatively) reliable external source (see however IMDB#Criticisms, a bit scary I have to say). --Edcolins 11:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Invite to consider Novels WikiProject Collaborations

Hi, as you have been contributing to a number of novels articles recently I would personally like to invite you to have a look at and consider participating in, our WikiProject Novels Collaboration department.

We propose articles to have a concerted effort at and once agreed edit away to make as many improvements as we can.!!

We look forward to possibly gaining the benefit of your input! :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 11:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Redirect

Hi. I've noticed a redirect pointing to a page in your user space (1001 Books to Read Before You Die). Redirects such as these are discouraged except temporarily after moving a page to user space. The reason for this is that either the redirect is an potential legitimate article title – in which case it should not point to a user page because they are generally considered to be "owned" by that user, not freely editable by everyone as articles should be – or it is an inappropriate article title, in which case it shouldn't exist at all. Redirects to user pages may be speedy deleted at any time under the criteria for speedy deletion, so it will probably disappear at some point. If the user page is intended to be an article, please move it out of user space (requesting deletion of the redirect first if necessary). Thanks – Gurch 11:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I've removed the redirect. I do not know if the page meets the criteria for making a Wikipedia article, but would consider moving if the answer is yes. --Jahsonic 11:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

It might be suitable... looks like it could be useful material, anyway. Almost all the items on the list have links, which is good (lists full of red links don't go down well). It certainly wouldn't be speedy deleted, though obviously I can't promise someone won't send it to AfD. I recommend you see if you can fix it up so the numbering works without having to indent like it is, before you move it, as it would look better without everything being monospaced – Gurch 12:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Armand Rassenfosse

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Armand Rassenfosse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.145.243.196 14:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation in Duncan Fallowell

Most of the text in Duncan Fallowell appears to come from this site. Do you have permission to reuse this material? If so, please post a notice to that effect in accordance with the donating copyrighted materials process. Thank you. elmindreda 23:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Transgressive artists

Hello, Jahsonic: I looked through the edit history for Transgressive art and found that you were a major contributor. After looking at your user page, I can see that I've come to the right person, so to speak, to solicit input from on this CFD (especially since the creator of the category was an anon. IP editor). As for myself, I have concerns about the workability of the category, but have not as yet come to any conclusions. Any insights or suggestions you can offer would be very welcome. Regards, Cgingold 19:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Motif (narrative)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Motif (narrative), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

David Denby

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Denby, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of David Denby. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Brian Tarsis

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Brian Tarsis, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Brian Tarsis seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Brian Tarsis, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dick O'Dell

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dick O'Dell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 04:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

question

How well do you know the academic literature on subcultures? Slrubenstein | Talk 15:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brian Tarsis

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brian Tarsis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability - no sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 16:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patrick Adams

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Patrick Adams, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Has been unsourced for 3 months, fails the sourcing requirement at WP:BLP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kevin (talk) 11:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sigma Sound Studios

A tag has been placed on Sigma Sound Studios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ipatrol (talk) 19:30, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jahsonic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 16 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Vince Aletti - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. José Bénazéraf - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Sergio Martino - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Mac Ahlberg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Jacques Sadoul - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Renzo Barbieri - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Serge Bramly - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Albert K. Cohen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Candido Camero - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Jack Hill - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Bo Arne Vibenius 12. Stephen Thrower 13. Wolf C. Hartwig 14. Ben Liebrand 15. Spoonie Gee 16. Erna Brodber

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Albert K. Cohen

The article Albert K. Cohen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Unitasock (talk) 23:13, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rationale of the Dirty Joke

The article Rationale of the Dirty Joke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is original research and not a proper article. Apart from the introduction there's nothing here that actually describes or analyses the book. And from the intro we can surmise that even when published it wasn't notable. Fails WP:OR, WP:N, WP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sex Stars System

The article Sex Stars System has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created in 2005, it has remained an unreferenced stub since and fails to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 12:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

César Graña

Hi Jahsonic. Are you currently active and, if so, are you still interested in doing an article on César Graña? I have some bibliography. Herostratus (talk) 02:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

• Nevermind, I have completed this article myself, mostly using Russian sources. But your proto-article was useful to me, thank you. Herostratus (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Men's Wives

The article Men's Wives has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Micro stub - redirect to author?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.

Due to your past contribution to Technological utopianism, you may currently want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

I feel Loremaster is editing Singularitarianism and Technological utopianism in a biased manner in accordance with his Save The Earth propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards Neo-Luddism. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion:

Loremaster says he is:

"...critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms."

Loremaster wants people to:

"...stop indulging in techno-utopian fantasies... ...so that we can all focus on energies on saving the planet."

Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states:

"Although I am convinced that the world is in fact heading toward an ecological catastrophe, I think it can be averted and my optimism makes me want to fight to do do just that."

81.151.135.248 (talk) 12:07, 18 December 2010 (UTC)JB

1. LOL
2. Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a technorealist who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the Technological utopianism or Singularitarianism articles. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding the former article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book Citizen Cyborg).
3. I find it disgusting that 81.151.135.248 would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.
4. In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia.

--Loremaster (talk) 00:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mastercuts

The article Mastercuts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's nothing to this article any more. Also, I haven't been able to find anything, anywhere that proves this subject meets the notability requirements.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Category:New York Society for the Suppression of Vice

Category:New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Everyday life

The article Everyday life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacs notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meclee (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Universal Robot Band

The article The Universal Robot Band has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has been around for quite a while, but I don't see where it passes WP:NBAND. They have released only one single, and it is not even stated whether the single was successful or not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 06:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of David Denby (academic) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Denby (academic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Denby (academic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of David R. Godine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David R. Godine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Godine (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 15:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jahsonic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bülent Öztürk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bülent Öztürk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bülent Öztürk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 23:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jahsonic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prelude Records (shop)

The article Prelude Records (shop) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:16, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

"Modernist art" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Modernist art and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 18#Modernist art until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

"Histories (history of the novel)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Histories (history of the novel) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 4 § Histories (history of the novel) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)