HayleyLike
Welcome!
editHello, HayleyLike, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nicole Mandich, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GABgab 02:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nicole Mandich
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nicole Mandich, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GABgab 02:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Keeping the article about Nicole Mandich
editBut I am the one who established the article about Nicole Mandich. This article must be kept immediately! --> User:HayleyLike
- Forgive me for asking, but do you have any connection to Alma Fordy? GABgab 03:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
I don't have anything to do with Alma Fordy because I am not related to this user. --> User:HayleyLike
Also, GAB, why did you put the Speedy deletion sign up there. What happens if I remove it? How can I keep my article? Could you help me find citations of this person? --> User:HayleyLike
- Come on, it's obvious what's going on here. I'm blocking this account as blatant sock puppet of Alma Fordy. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
But wait! HayleyLike is friendly. Do not block her. It is a girly user. It is sexy and full of girlhood. Please unblock her. It only deals with girls stuff, NinjaRobotPirate.
January 2017
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC) |
User HayleyLike is not a sock puppet of Alma Fordy, NinjaRobotPirate. It does not deal with what Fordy does. It is a seperate user because it only focuses on adding new articles. Please unblock HayleyLike now. Please don't do an indefinite block. Please lower it for a very short time. You must!!!!!!! HayleyLike is friendly, not harmful. Please remove her from the Sock Puppetry Investigations Category. Please!!!!!!--> User:HayleyLike
- The reason I blocked this account is because I'm convinced by the available evidence that you're a sock puppet. I'm unlikely to unblock a sock puppet account. I accept that you're probably a friendly and helpful person in real life, but you're breaking Wikipedia's rules by engaging in sock puppetry. You seem to have a zeal to edit Wikipedia, but it's going to be an uphill battle, I think, to convince an administer that you understand our policies well enough to be trusted to be unblocked. However, if you log into Alma Fordy, your original account, you might be able to convince an admin to unblock you. Before you do that, you should read through WP:SOCK, WP:N, WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:GAB. I know it's a lot of reading material, but if you can concisely summarize them (in one sentence each), there's a fair chance you'll get unblocked. Once you feel you understand them, make an unblock request with {{unblock}} (preferably from your Alma Fordy account). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 17 January
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Alexander Rodnyansky page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Elixir Films
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Elixir Films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JDWFC (talk) 14:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)