Gammalambdaomega1952

August 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gamma Lambda Omega, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Jeremyb (talk) 05:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gamma Lambda Omega Crest.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gamma Lambda Omega Crest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Since this and other Gamma Lambda Omega images were already posted on commons, I've deleted the versions here and updated the article to point to the commons images. Unusual for a fraternity to open their logo up to the public domain, but there you go. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Gamma Lambda Omega article

I do random editing via the "random article" button. That is how I came upon the subject article. I respect your endeavors and hard work. However, I wonder why you recently removed some of the more interesting facts and yet you left that terribly long and imposing Hazing law thread. It now dominates the article when at best it should be a link or something. It is much to powerful, completely un-necessary and should be moved. Lets discuss.--Buster7 (talk) 11:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Gamma Lambda Omega for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gamma Lambda Omega is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Tau Omega (Philippines) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.