Flix11

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

• Flix11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - pie - global contribs

The summary

As of 5 September 2021.

CASES PER 100,000

• <750: Aceh, Lampung, Sumut, Sumsel, Kalbar, NTB
  
• 750–1,499: Jateng, Jabar, Sulsel, Sulut, Banten, Bengkulu, Malut, Sulteng, Jatim, NTT, Gorontalo, Maluku, Sulbar, Jambi, Papua, Sultra
  
• 1,500–2,249: Papbar, Riau, Kalteng, Kalsel, Sumbar
  
• 2,250–2,999: Kepri, Bali
  
• ≥3,000: DKI, DIY, Kaltim, Kaltara, Babel
  

CONFIRMED CASES

• <25,000: Maluku, Bengkulu, Malut, Gorontalo, Papbar, Sultra, Sulbar
  
• 25,000–49,999: Lampung, Kalteng, Sulteng, Kalbar, Papua, Sulut, Kaltara, Aceh, Jambi, NTB
  
• 50,000–99,999: Sumut, Sumbar, Kalsel, Sumsel, NTT, Kepri
  
• 100,000–249,999: Kaltim, DIY, Banten, Riau, Bali, Sulsel
  
• ≥250,000: DKI, Jabar, Jateng, Jatim
  

RECOVERIES

• <25,000: Gorontalo, NTB, Sulbar, Sultra, Papbar, Maluku, Malut, Papua, Bengkulu
  
• 25,000–49,999: Kepri, Babel, Lampung, Kalteng, Sulteng, Kalbar, Sulut, Kaltara, Jambi, Aceh
  
• 50,000–99,999: Sulsel, Bali, Sumut, Sumbar, Kalsel, Sumsel, NTT
  
• 100,000–249,999: Kaltim, DIY, Banten, Riau
  
• ≥250,000: Jakarta, Jatim, Jateng, Jabar
  

DEATHS

• <1,000: Kalbar, Sulut, NTB, Sulbar, Jambi, Kaltara, Sultra, Gorontalo, Maluku, Malut, Papua, Papbar, Bengkulu
  
• 1,000–2,499: Sumut, Kalsel, Sulsel, Sumbar, Kepri, Aceh, Sulteng, Kalteng, Babel, NTT
  
• 2,500–4,999: DIY, Lampung, Riau, Bali, Sumsel, Banten
  
• 5,000–9,999: Kaltim
  
• ≥10,000: DKI, Jateng, Jatim, Jabar

Sulut and Sumsel have passed 25k and 50k recoveries respectively. HiChrisBoyleHere (talk) 15:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

@HiChrisBoyleHere: Hi Chris. If you need any updates on maps you can contact me here or in IDWIKI. Thanks and keep updating for the next 3 months. Flix11 (talk) 10:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

You cannot use this page to ask that others edit for you. In addition, if you are asking others to edit for you off wiki they risk being blocked as sockpuppets. You only have access to this page to request unblock; if you use it for other purposes, your access will be removed. 331dot (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

@Flix11: I won't be able to update the maps since I don't know what software/app to use. @331dot: We both are the regular editors for the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia related articles. Because he is blocked, I'll be editing the articles solely to keep it updated and it has nothing to do with his block issues. HiChrisBoyleHere (talk) 10:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot: If I requested to protect my page from Palembang IP vandals attacking here and talking nonsense such as 182.1.235.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) here or 182.1.233.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), will I got blocked further? Did I have no rights to revert talk page vandalism on mine? It looks like everything I did is all wrong for you. Flix11 (talk) 10:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

You can remove posts from this page(except for declined unblock requests while blocked), see WP:BLANKING, that is not a problem. But you cannot ask others to edit for you. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot: OK then. Please protect this page from IP vandals. Flix11 (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

You had one IP vandal, that does not warrant protection. 331dot (talk) 10:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot: I have been vandalized 5 times in the past 7 days. The earlier 4 were removed by admins including Materialscientist. If you notice I already listed 2 IPs above unlike 1 you claimed. 182.1.235.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) (read the gibberish here), 182.1.233.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 116.206.35.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 182.1.235.94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 114.125.230.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log); all from Palembang, all saying the same thing like the one undeleted. Maybe if I tag other admins they will erase it because they take this seriously. Flix11 (talk) 11:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Why would these IPs post to your user talk page? 331dot (talk) 11:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot: That is the problem. I don't know. FYI, if you look back to June 2020 you can see this page was protected for a year for another vandalism from 3 IP ranges originated from East Java. See right below. There is a reply regarding this kind of vandalism, done by reverting edits I made. Flix11 (talk) 11:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Very well, I have protected this page. You still may not ask others to make edits for you or otherwise coordinate editing with others. 331dot (talk) 11:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

48 hours? Materialscientist protected this for 72 hours after the 4th and 5 hours after the automatic unblock the Palembangese strikes again. After the 5th you lower down the time? Well I guess a sobered-up edit warrior is a pariah and forever an edit warrior for you and deserves nothing. Flix11 (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, meant to do it for a week. No need to assign motives to me that I don't have. 331dot (talk) 11:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Appreciate it. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 11:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Re: Please block

Done, to match the other /16 range. Yes I know the /22 of the latest IP was also blocked, but blocking the /16 is probably a good idea too. Graham87 06:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

I've undone that block after noticing the conversation you had with Mz7, who placed the /22 block, and looking more deeply into the range's contributions. I've noticed from your contribs that you asked *eight* admins individually ... the admins' noticeboards are a better and more socially acceptable way of getting admins' attention. Graham87 06:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

@Graham87: The IPs inside the 3 ranges have vandalized pages I edited and taunted me personally since 7 June. And he (assuming the vandal is one same boy) did it all over the Wikimedia projects, even in Wikiquote, Croatian Wikipedia, and MetaWiki. So I did so because I am frustrated on this. And the WP:AIV was at a massive backlog which saw about 30 undone reports if I am not mistaken. I strongly believe the vandal is someone who knows me in real life, since he knows about my preferences and Twitter account. But I still can not find out who he is. So I suggest you to reinstate the block and do it longer than a month I presume. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 07:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

I sympathise with your predicament, but unfortunately South/South-east Asian IP address pools are some of the most dynamic in the world in my experience, and it's extremely hard to block an individual troublemaker from these ranges without either blocking an entire region or playing a constant game of Whac-A-Mole. If another admin feels comfortable re-imposing the block they can feel free to do so without consulting me, but I'm not quite there yet. Graham87 09:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Kit

Hey. I love your kit designs. I wondered if you could add a third kit to Millwall F.C. when you find the time, it was just released today and is a great red design (https://shop.millwallfc.co.uk/replica-kits/third-kit/). Cheers! TheLostBoy (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Revert on Cavani

Noticed this is the 2nd time you are reverting my update when there was absolute no need. I updated the stats correctly in infobox this time. Give it a check. Would like to see a reply from you. Thanks! Kokoeist (talk) 14:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@Kokoeist: You only updated the header. Flix11 (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@Flix11 I updated the stats in infobox, and updated the timestamp. There was no mistake in at all. There was no need to revert it. You had the career stats section to update. You could've done it without reverting my edit. There is no rule that an editor have to update the infobox and career stats at the same time. Kokoeist (talk) 14:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@Kokoeist: Yeah, sorry. It was merely instinctive. Flix11 (talk) 14:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

No probs mate. I just wanted to know if I did anything wrong there. Happy editing. Cheers! Kokoeist (talk) 14:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit

I take it you have to be in a special sect to edit these things as all you did was undo and redo exactly what i did. Please explain Redmist79 (talk) 14:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@Redmist79: You did on De Gea and Fernandes BEFORE the match was over and it is violating WP:LIVESCORES. As far as I knew, the match was not done yet. Flix11 (talk) 14:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Requests for page protection

You might have missed my WP:Notification when I declined a request at WP:RFPP so I am posting here. The previous request is at permalink where I wrote:

As above (Mauricio Pochettino), I'm declining but if the problem continues, please add a short section on article talk showing why the edits are wrong and ping me. Then I'll look again.

The problem is that only someone familiar with the topic would know why the IP edits are vandalism (per definition at WP:VAND). I have declined the new request but am very willing to protect the page if I could see why the IP edits are vandalism. An explanation on talk also helps others who see activity at the article. Use a heading like "Recent edits" and ping me from there. Johnuniq (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Descriptive edit summaries

In heavily edited pages, could you please be a little more descriptive in your edit summaries, saying what you're doing and why? Like this one. What did you fix? It's helpful for the many people trying to review the sometimes hundreds of edits per day. ~Awilley (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Hyderabad FC 2020-21 kit

Hi. I observed that you worked a lot on many football pages and need a small help. There is a new jersey design for Hyderabad FC and was hoping if you could help in creating it to place in the 2020-21 Hyderabad FC season season page. The link for both home and away kits can be found below
kit
Please let me know if you could help me with this. Thanks. SaGa (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Man Utd 202021 UCL

The changes I made were correct. Why change them back? BRACK66 (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Cool

Hi Flix : sorry I lost my cool with you this afternoon. I will try to behave a bit better. Matilda Maniac (talk) 09:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Your response

I think your response will be valuable here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indonesian people with COVID-19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SunDawn (talk • contribs) 04:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Help?

Hi Flix11. I've seen you put up the new kits for NK Široki Brijeg. Now I've recently asked for help at the Template talk:Football kit/pattern list but no one answered. You see, three new kits were revealed for FK Željezničar Sarajevo not long ago, the home, away and third kit ones. Could you please design, upload them on commons and put them in the article's infobox? If it's easier to know, you don't have too do the third one if you don't want to, just the two main ones. I would greatly appreciate it. They were made by Macron. Here are the links for all three:

• Home kit: https://shop.fkzeljeznicar.ba/proizvod/domaci-dres-2020-21/
• Away kit: https://shop.fkzeljeznicar.ba/proizvod/gostujuci-dres-2020-2021/
• Third kit: https://shop.fkzeljeznicar.ba/proizvod/treci-dres-2020-2021/

Kirbapara (talk) 15:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Sources in infobox

I hope you will respond this time, as this is not the first time I've left a message here or that we've had different views...

"Publisher is the body, website is the ".com". And people tends to read the infobox first hence importance for source. Who says sourcing is only limited to 1?"

• The publisher is not the body. Publisher means that the origin of the reference, such as "Burnley F.C." (not Football Club) will not be shown in italics. When citing a website, it is in italics. It might not be a big deal, but when nominating an article for e.g. FAC, people will mention it.

• Because people tend the read the infobox first, that doesn't mean there is any need for a reference, when it's already there further in the text/body of the article. Sourcing is therefore limited to only one place, as it becomes duplicate. See WP:INFOBOXREF (it's really stated clearly here...).

Again, I'm really not here to piss you off and I don't have any bad intentions. I'm going to revert the edits in both articles and I hope it's all clear now. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 08:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

@WA8MTWAYC: Read Template:Cite_web#Publisher. Flix11 (talk) 08:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Your link doesn't mention any of what you've stated, only that the publisher parameter can be linked if it has a wikipedia page. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 08:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

So again, your edits in this setting are not justified on both the Burnley F.C. and Turf Moor pages. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 08:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

@WA8MTWAYC: "The publisher is the company, organization or other legal entity that publishes the work being cited. Do not use the publisher parameter for the name of a work (e.g. a website, book, encyclopedia, newspaper, magazine, journal, etc.)." Flix11 (talk) 08:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

What's your point here? How is that relevant to the infobox debate? Regarding the publisher parameter, we don't know who is the publisher behind Burnley F.C.'s website, it could be an independant company. For example, 11v11.com is the website, but "AFS Enterprises" is the publisher.

What I meant by "mix up": because of the edit, the Burnley F.C. sources got two different parameters, either website or publisher, and it should be only one, because of consistency. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 08:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Please read WP:INFOBOXREF carefully. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 08:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

@WA8MTWAYC: Alright, erase that. But regarding if you write website it should be burnleyfootballclub.com or if publisher then Burnley Football Club. Flix11 (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

I agree and I used to write the full name indeed ("Football Club"), but I changed it some time ago to "F.C." because I wanted it to align with the titles of the WP articles. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 08:53, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Vietnam national football team update kit 2021?

Is there an update to the player shirt yet you? https://www.facebook.com/grandsportvietnam.official/ Nguonnhanluc853 (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, can you update the Vietnam team shirt 2021 help me? https://grandsportvietnam.com/Nguonnhanluc853 (talk) 11:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nguonnhanluc853: Please contact User talk:JonasBR. He makes kits. Thank you. Flix11 (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

I asked, but he did not respond? Nguonnhanluc853 (talk) 05:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nguonnhanluc853: Just be patient. Ask him on Commons Wikimedia instead of here. My request for Norwich City 3rd kit was only fulfilled about 3 months later. He seems put forward kits of his own Brazilian minnow clubs now. Again, contact him on Commons Wikimedia. Flix11 (talk) 05:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

DJPrettyUnicorns

Didn't have the SPI page on my watchlist and hadn't realize someone got to it before me, lol. I'll add mine as a comment to yours. Magitroopa (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

FYI... DJSpinnyDan is probably yet another account. Magitroopa (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

It seems you also work on articles related to Indonesia, I was looking for article expansion help at articles like Islamic advice literature, Draft:Aurats (word) an article about historical linguistics and in article several sections are in need of expansion, besides presently those do not have coverage about Indonesian. Please do visit those articles as and when time permits you and pl. do help in article expansions if those topics interest you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 08:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

2020 Toyota Thailand Open

Thanks for the explanation. I moved your comment to User talk:Vinish Kumar V; please let me know if there are any more disruptive edits. Enterprisey (talk!) 08:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Manchester United page still not fixed

Hi Flix11, I noticed you reverted some of the edits on the Manchester United seasons page but unfortunately looked like the harm had already been caused may have to revert more because the layout still hasnt been fixed. Just drawing your attention. Thanks Ampimd (talk) 22:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

8 individual scorers

Apologies for the missing summary. The other matches had 7 individual scorers. So Manchester United are the only side to have 8 individual scorers in a single match. MattSucci (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Manchester United-Arsenal rivalry

Could you please take it to the talkpage or WT:FOOTY before reverting changes. For instance, there is no need to add statistics of every single league match since 1992, when a head-to-head table would suffice. Lemonade51 (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

"Then erase these kind of records on all pages. It was not me who added the league record in the 1st place," firstly, just because one page has a record of every single match does not mean this page should follow suit. Wikipedia is not a statistics directory; head-to-head results would suffice and if people want to know the result of in a league encounter in 2003 then they can be directed to the external links (where 11v11 has that information). Secondly, trying to deflect blame ("It was not me who added the league record in the 1st place") isn't going to solve anything. The page explicitly states that the rivalry died out around 2005, so what would be the point of including results post that period? Moreover, there is a recency bias, why are Premier League results only included and not Football League (when the rivalry 'started'?). Point is, a table with a summary of results is better than a comprehensive list. I've restored the page to how it was when it passed the WP:GA criteria. If you wish to challenge then post a comment on the talkpage or WT:FOOTY rather than reverting. Lemonade51 (talk) 12:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Match programmes

I don't think we can justify putting the match programme in the infobox as it's a copyrighted work and I don't think Fair Use is satisfied. We don't discuss the programme at all and I'm pretty sure the design of the programme is not the primary identifier for the match. – PeeJay 16:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@PeeJay: The stadium pic is a worse primary identifier for the match. At least the programme is dedicated specifically for the match on the said date. I followed the Southampton F.C. 0–9 Leicester City F.C. Flix11 (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

That article doesn't look like it's been peer reviewed or rated as Featured, whereas Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C. has been and it was determined that match programme covers shouldn't be included unless their design is being commented on. The infobox image doesn't have to be a primary identifier of the subject, but if you want to use a copyrighted image, it serve as the primary identifier in order to satisfy the Fair Use criteria. – PeeJay 21:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Recent reverts

Hi, just wondering what the deal is with your recent reverts? Like here, where you restored content that isn't supported by the source (Matić wasn't involved in the 2015 League Cup Final). Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

J.League referees name translated list

https://data.j-league.or.jp/SFIX08/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by らぼるぺ (talk • contribs) 12:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

for your information--らぼるぺ (talk) 12:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 J.League Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shizuoka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

ART specimens/people tested graphs and method of counting

Hi Flix. I don't think we should create the ART specimens graphs. These are my reasons:

• There's no any PCR/TCM specimens graphs. Starting from today, the Ministry of Health count them all as one. It will be confusing to add the numbers if we distinguish them. Plus this will only burden the article and redundant.
• No consistency between specimens and people tested for both PCR/TCM and ART. I have fixed this issue so starting from 3 March (and from now on) the method of counting for the graphs will include the PCR/TCM and ART. HiChrisBoyleHere (talk) 17:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

2013–14 AFC Bournemouth season

Hiya Flix, are you able to move the football kits into the info box here and remove that bit from the article, there seems to be a number of Bournemouth articles this could be done on. Much appreciated if you can, Cheers. Govvy (talk) 12:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Dean Henderson

The other footnote I'm referring is the one in the Other column in the Shrewsbury Town row. The footnotes are written as sentence fragments and therefore aren't grammatically constructed in the way sentences usually would be, and writing "the" in front of each competition name isn't needed. See also WP:FOOTY/Players#Career statistics, the project approved MoS for player biographies, which doesn't include "the" in footnotes. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

I take it you've no objection so I've changed it back. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Germany National team

Hey!

I am just wondering why my edit on Germany National team got reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noogometni urejevalec (talk • contribs) 06:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

@Noogometni urejevalec: Hey. Just think that is too much information for now. I think there has not been something like this before. Flix11 (talk) 09:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Too much information? I just added that Low is stepping from the role of a national team's job after the euros. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noogometni urejevalec (talk • contribs) 15:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Different times

So I just realized that the Ministry of Health releases the vaccination numbers at various times. For example, today they updated it at 09:00, 15:00, and 18:00. Which one should we follow? HiChrisBoyleHere (talk) 18:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

2021 Makassar Bombing

I apologize for being rude, but I disagree with moving page Makassar cathedral bombing just because it's never happened before there. As with most of other terrorist attacks such as 2003 Aceh New Year's Eve bombing, 2005 Palu market bombing, 2020 South Daha Attack, 2019 Medan suicide bombing, etc are following this pattern to avoid generalized title. Nyanardsan (talk) 05:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

According to Transfermarkt's login page: Whether player info, coach info, club info, or match report – as a Transfermarkt user, you can edit and add to almost all data by yourself. This makes it a self-published and therefore unreliable source. Just because the link to the previously cited source broke, does not give you licence to cite an unreliable one. Please do not add the link to 2020–21 Premier League again. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Darker blue

Hi Flix. I've just changed the color for >2,500 deaths (DKI, Jabar, Jateng, Jatim) on the map to slightly darker blue. Kindly change it whenever you're free. Thanks. HiChrisBoyleHere (talk) 05:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Fix on Disney Channel

Hello, I'm DinosaurTrexXX33, I saw you deleted my delete of the age ranges on Disney Channel. Please re-add them with a source next time. Thank you, DinosaurTrexXX33 (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your editing

Please don't make edits like this. You changed the meaning of that text and left it making no sense. SarahSV ^(talk) 21:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Premier League table

Hi, there seems to be an error when editing the 2020–21 Premier League table. When I go to publish it, I get this error:

Warning: orphaned results = col_ECLPO

Warning: orphaned results = text_ECLPO.

Maybe you could have a look into it and see if you can fix it?

Regards

L1amw90 (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

@L1amw90: That's fine. It is just a warning caused by the lack of declaration. Once we know who wins the EFL Cup we will never see that again. Flix11 (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

AFC Champions League group tables

Hello dear user,

Does it need source? Farzinovski (talk) 22:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

see it Farzinovski (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

No. I just got confused since you did not update the dates as well, so I reverted it. See Special:Diff/1018597290. Flix11 (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Ryan Mason

And there I was thinking he is far too young to be in a manager position, thinking, there must be miss-information going on, he is only training the first team for a day... but then, 24 hours later they appoint him as interim manager! Ugg, my heart sank, he is only 29! Youngest Interim manager in history!!??? Govvy (talk) 08:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

@Govvy: According to OptaJoe, the youngest ever Spurs manager in league history, the youngest manager in PL era. Flix11 (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar for you!

		The Indonesia Barnstar of National Merit
		For your continuous work in updating COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia and for your works in articles concerning Indonesia SunDawn (talk) 16:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 J.League Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihiro Kato.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Champions League statistics

The new style should be adopted for even Europa League then.--Island92 (talk) 10:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

@Island92: Yes, indeed. Will you help? Flix11 (talk) 10:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

For this time I'd rather you completed it, whether you don't mind. Articles are not too many about the Europa League.--Island92 (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

In any case, it would have been much better had you got consensus for this new style either in the talk page or into WikiProject Football.--Island92 (talk) 10:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2020–21 Premier League

On 16 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020–21 Premier League, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 15:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

PL article reversions

why do you keep reverting other people's additions like this: [1]? You have not fully restored the information and it is just plain obnoxious. Spike 'em (talk) 06:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please, do not edit war. Per common courtesy (WP:BRD): you were bold, I reverted, you should discuss (not keep on reverting...) Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: OK, why then? Flix11 (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Why what? You are the one making unexplained changes. What purpose does messing up the infobox serve? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: Why do you insist on giving enters on infobox? Flix11 (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

It's clearer, more concise, and it doesn't make sense to do otherwise for players who have only played for one or two clubs. I would understand your formatting if they played for 15, 20 clubs, but in Amad Diallo's case there is no reason at all to not have the parameters on separate lines. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 00:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent comment on Jr2006Venz (talk)

Hi, i made the edit after the match was over. I coulndt find the attendance nor the referee's. After a while when the match was already over, no one edited it so i edited by putting the scores, goalscroes, and... I did not not add visible match or frame scores to an article until the match or tie is completed. and in fact there was other editors duiong the same in other pages. Thank you Jr2006Venz (talk) 18:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Francis White, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Prepare editing

Hello, Firstly thank you for your continuous edits. But please do not do preparation edits, as you are adding continuous unnecessary edits. Please wait until the match is over to edit in full. Thanks --Skyblueshaun (talk) 18:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

DeWitt Clinton

In terms of power, the Governor of New York is much more influential than a Vice-President. One VP, John Garner, said the office wasn't worth a bucket of warm piss. Anyway, so be it. WQUlrich (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sixth Party System. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 03:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Sixth Party System, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Redirects are not broken

Regarding Pope Honorius III and others, you do not need to pipe those links. See WP:NOTBROKEN. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

I was just about to write the same. I suggest also taking a look at WP:NOPIPE and MOS:NOPIPE. Surtsicna (talk) 13:26, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Cards in National team results

Hi, there is a discussion on my talk page about cards in national team results. You are encouraged to join it. Mwiqdoh (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Unnecessary reverts

Instead of reverting my edit that updated the goal, and then doing the same exact edit, but changing the update date, you can just change the update date. There is really no need for reverting my edit. Mwiqdoh (talk) 15:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

You deleted my daily used template. And why do you in the U.S. meddling with Asian Champions League? I did USL because no one did that last year. Flix11 (talk) 15:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

@Flix11: I never deleted any templates? I like sports, am I only allowed to edit the US leagues? And these edit summaries don't help me understand what is the issue. SO instead of reverting with no edit summary, explain what the issue was. Mwiqdoh (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

@Flix11: [2] it doesn't matter. There are no future fixtures today, therefore the (1 of 2 matches completed) is irrelevant. Mwiqdoh (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

It does not looked outside, anyway. Why are you so bothered? Flix11 (talk) 16:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

@Flix11: It doesn't matter. Mwiqdoh (talk) 02:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Possible hypocrisy?

And why do you in the U.S. meddling with Asian Champions League? Why do you edit the MLS and USL when you live in Asia? Mwiqdoh (talk) 02:52, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

I have said above. Absolutely no one, not even you did that last year, or even last month. You wanna harass me now? Flix11 (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@Flix11: I wasn't even a Wikipedia editor last year, I joined a few weeks ago. I can update them now if you want me to because I can update the MLS and USL. I have no intention in harassing you, I simply stated that you are going against your own words. Mwiqdoh (talk) 02:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

One more thing, the Indonesian League is not even running ever since the pandemic began. Flix11 (talk) 02:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@Flix11: Sorry to hear that. But it's fine I can edit the MLS and USL because I watch those games on tv. Regarding this edit summary of yours, I'm NOT updating partially, when I try to update fully I have an edit conflict with you. So just wait for me next time. Mwiqdoh (talk) 02:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello, Flix11. I'm 180.254.174.46, i see you requesting the page protection of Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia in WP:RFPP (see the link) but you stats that the distruption caused by Javito1993, which it is clear evidence that the distruptive editing has been occured by a single user. Why you doesn't warn that user in the user talk page or reported it to ANI and AIV? you don't seem to dare to report that user. I hope you can report that user if distruption continues. 180.254.174.46 (talk) 11:15, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 AFC Champions League group stage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naoki Maeda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Abuse of process

Flix11, you have been repeatedly filing bad reports at WP:AIV. The latest two are here. In both instances, the reported editor made two edits yesterday, and neither editor has been warned, by you or by anyone else. These are not the first two reports of this kind I've seen. I've already commented on the bad report you filed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Javito1993, and the clerk agreed. This has to stop, or you risk being blocked for disruption at administrator noticeboards.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

@Bbb23: This one, you will not be disappointed. Flix11 (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Just review the 12 links I provided there. Flix11 (talk) 17:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

The main problem with your edits recently has been at AIV. Why do you continue to file these kinds of frivolous reports? I've seen many, and most are declined. You're an experienced editor; I don't understand it. The SPI was a side note, but even now that you've posted diffs as requested (although in the wrong section), why did you request a CU? Even if you're unaware that such a request will be denied, the instructions at the top of the page say in bold "Additionally, CheckUsers will not publicly connect an account with an IP address per the privacy policy except in extremely rare circumstances."--Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Just tired. So will you do a thing to prevent sockpuppetry and disruptive editing (Javito1993 has been blocked indef not on my report, BTW)? Flix11 (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• You filed another baseless report at WP:AIV, which was rejected by Ponyo here. This is a final warning. If you do this again, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
• After filing at ANI on the same issue, you have now filed a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Devranzio. Just like with a report you filed earlier this month, now at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Javito1993/Archive, you have requested a CU, even though the suspected sock is an IP, and you have presented no evidence in the form of diffs. This is just like your problems at AIV, and if you do this again, or if I see any form of abuse at any administrator noticeboard, you risk being blocked, and if I'm the admin who blocks you, it will not be partial. For the moment, you must fix the SPI report by changing the status back to Open and presenting diffs.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Rollback

I am unsure why you are abusing rollback as you have done here and here when involved in a content dispute, particularly given that prior to your edits I started a general discussion about the topic at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Medals in infobox.

Please see Wikipedia:Rollback#When to use rollback which states that "use of standard rollback for any other purposes – such as reverting good-faith changes which you happen to disagree with – is likely to be considered misuse of the tool. When in doubt, use another method of reversion and supply an edit summary to explain your reasoning".

Pinging @Bbb23: for their assistance, given I note they have recently raised other issues with you... GiantSnowman 14:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Argentina national under-23 football team - Barco

The Argentine footballer Barco name is Esequiel with "s". Although it seems unusual, his name is not "Ezequiel". In fact, it would be nice if you could request the name change of the corresponding article. Greetings.

Sources: https://olympics.com/tokyo-2020/olympic-games/en/results/football/athlete-profile-n1348522-barco-esequiel.htm https://www.ole.com.ar/futbol-internacional/ezequiel-barco-nombre-esequiel-atlanta_0_UxZA46_-O.html

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FK Liepāja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milan Lazarević.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

South Korea at the 2020 Summer Olympics

For the South Korea at the 2020 Summer Olympics page can you wait until the match starts on August 2nd??? All of that will be formalized when it's August 2nd. Please, this is so disruptive. Jr Tahun (talk) 05:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Volleyball

There was no vandalism at the semifinals. You just added the teams at times when the times are not known as i explained now in the edit summary. TBD* start times for quarterfinal and semifinal matches will be decided after participating teams are known. Or remove the times... Kante4 (talk) 09:23, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Spurs away Kit in info box

For Tottenham, did you create the away kit in the info box? I was looking at it compared to the images on the website [3], seems too dark to me. What do you think? Govvy (talk) 09:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Removal

There is no reason to remove who won the medals from the lead. They are sourced and a short summary. You are free to edit those to make it better but there is no good reason (for me) to remove those. Kante4 (talk) 09:53, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Football at the 2020 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashima.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

What is not vandalism in Wikipedia

Can you please refresh your knowledge of Wiki: What is not vandalism, such as the revert of a single word that you did at Template:2021 J1 League table today, which had fix vandalism as the edit summary? You still appear to be repeatedly disrupting a number of articles, in amongst 90% of great work, as this talk page seems to demonstrate. Please take on board the constructive criticism from many of these comments, and reflect on how your editing style could improve Wikipedia to a greater extent than it currently is. Matilda Maniac (talk) 13:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

@Matilda Maniac: Sorry, it should have been fix but obviously click wrong. Flix11 (talk) 15:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Nkosi Tafari / Burgess

Hi. What was the reason for rolling back the name of Nkosi Tafari back to Nkosi Burgess? As per the sources in the article, he has chosen to go by Tafari now and distance himself from Burgess? Given his reasons, it seems unfair to change his article back. The FC Dallas roster page even refers to him as Nkosi Tafari - https://www.fcdallas.com/players/nkosi-burgess/. UncleTupelo1 (talk) 23:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

@UncleTupelo1: Oddly, the web title says Burgess. Flix11 (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

@Flix11: I imagine some legacy caching issue. The article says Tafari though? Would you think it justified to revert back? UncleTupelo1 (talk) 12:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

?

Can you just stop calling me in the edit summary. I don't do that with any editor, just completely unnecessary. Do your edit and nothing more, no need to act like you are better or so... Kante4 (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirill Romanov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Song Ui-young‎‎

What's with the double reversions? Also, just to clarify, my reversion is not to revert your edits, but the ip editor's because they had removed newer information, and reverted to a version which was confusing and with a section wrongly placed. – robertsky (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

2021 FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup#Group_C

If Belarus beats Brasil at extra time (2 points) or penalty shoot-out (1 point), they will have 2 or 3 points. And Brasil will get no points, so they will still have 3 points. And if El Salvador wins against Switzerland (without extra time), they will also have 3 points. Therefore they can still qualify via goal difference!

Fix of the symbol -

Hey! I noticed and thanked your edits at Table tennis at the 2020 Summer Paralympics – Women's individual – Class 9. But after your fixing, I failed to open the links. Please do not fix symbols in the links. Wish you a good day! :) -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Which one? Consider changing "–" to "-". Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 11:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 12:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Partial block from Cristiano Ronaldo and from WP:RFPP/I

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of one week for violating the 3 revert rule on Cristiano Ronaldo and for disruptive editing at WP:RFPP/I after multiple warnings against its misuse. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 17:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flix11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I defended the page from someone who insisted on erasing info even though it happens. And I already fighting vandalism on that page so this block will hinder me of doing that (editing current club when the transfer is yet to be done, hence my commented warning on infobox). If I get unblocked I promise to not do this again.

Decline reason:

You seem to be trying to justify your edit warring and misuse of RFPP, and not telling us what was wrong with it. 331dot (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wrong guy (moved from User talk:El C)

Why are you blocking me? Flix11 (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

What in my block notice do you not understand, Flix11? El_C 17:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

@El C: Well I got blocked even after I countering vandalism? I want to serve the best I can to ensure the article is updated to the limit permitted. Flix11 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Please don't call good faith edits vandalism, Flix11 —see what vandalism is not— it's a personal attack. El_C 18:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

@El C: I mean those who change the current club before due, not the other guy blocked. Flix11 (talk) 18:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Okay, well, that's not what this block is about, so...? El_C 18:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

@El C: Well I am sorry and I want to be unblocked. I regret of doing 3RR and shall never do that again. Flix11 (talk) 18:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I'd rather another admin attend to the unblock request. Personally, I don't see the urgency for it, but whatever, doesn't matter. El_C 19:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

@El C: All he was doing was restoring content which was sourced from a primary source, backed up by a legit secondary source. SoonerFan4life67 who was removing content saying it's not official, when the source was official which kind of makes SoonerFan who removal of content contradictory. Yes Flix broke the 3RR by doing it a fourth time. However is your block not a little excessive? Govvy (talk) 14:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi

How are you SportsloverXD (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

This block is two weeks as you have been blocked for edit warring before. 331dot (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flix11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry. I will not do that ever again. I am updating Paralympics now. Can you please give me mercy? Flix11 (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The block is well justified and you should be grateful that it's only for two weeks. Your recent activity has been disruptive to the project, and this includes several of your bad AIV reports. Please take this time to read up on our policies and consider your approach before you end up being blocked indefinitely. Widr (talk) 12:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You said before that you wouldn't do it again, and you have. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot: No. I did not break WP:3RR says "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period reverts." I did 3 sharp. Please review and consider my other updates @Materialscientist: @Bbb23: @MelanieN: Flix11 (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

You don't have to break 3RR to be edit warring. 3RR is not an entitlement to three reverts. 331dot (talk) 11:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot: Please consider my updates and my mostly good editings on 2021 Major League Soccer season and Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Flix11 (talk) 11:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Fixing a ping after the fact does not work; you need to sign the same post in which you ping. I would suggest that you not ping other admins to this matter; your request is open and visible, and will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot (talk) 11:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot: Then I request to be blocked from that one page for a month, maybe. But just don't from all pages. I have responsibilities in COVID-19 updating. Flix11 (talk) 11:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

As you have now edit warred on a variety of articles, I stand by the block. No one has "responsibilities" here unless you have been tasked with editing as part of your job- which Wikipedia is not concerned with. You should consider other edits you would like to make before edit warring. 331dot (talk) 11:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

@331dot: OK. How about this. Another 3RR from me and I am blocked for good (3 strikes), but need immediate unblock. How is that? Flix11 (talk) 11:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia has no deadlines so no one needs an "immediate" unblock. You will need to wait for your request to be reviewed by a heretofore uninvolved adminstrator. Again, you aren't blocked specifically for violating 3RR. I have nothing else to say at this time. 331dot (talk) 12:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion using PositiveIntentsOnly (talk · contribs). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 16:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flix11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

So basically, I am barred from WP for SP right? Then why Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Javito1993 this not enacted? Why only me? But please. I am swearing with my life I will never ever do harm to WP again and contribute wisely. After all, I updated several things and I did not even do 3RR (reverted 4 or more). If I ever do this again you shall block me for good.

Decline reason:

Whatboutism is never a valid reason for unblock. Continue with this line of reasoning and you'll quickly find your talk page access revoked as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, you cannot create a new account to evade the block on this account. The block is on you personally, not just your account. So you are no longer "retired"? 331dot (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Equal treatment here please Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Javito1993. And I have redeemed myself. In that account I admit myself because my consciousness still prevails. Flix11 (talk) 17:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Each case is considered on its own merits; as Wikipedia is a volunteer project, yes, some things get by us. How other matters are handled is not relevant to the disposition of your matter. If you have ideas as to how to increase participation here or to increase the number of admins, you may offer those in the proper forum once unblocked. 331dot (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flix11. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 23:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flix11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked quite unfairly (so-called edit warring without committing 3RR). I always edit in good faith for 10 years and would not have to do this had I not been blocked for something really small for 2 weeks. Please unblock me, I am begging you. Flix11 (talk) 02:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per Robertsky, you should take the standard offer and submit an unblock request in 6 months with no more socking. PhilKnight (talk) 06:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You crossed the line when you choose to create sock accounts to circumvent your blocks, even if it felt unfair. With relation to sock blocks, there is a standard offer. Come back again 6 months later after your head and heels are cooled down reasonably and reflect why the community chose to have you blocked. – robertsky (talk) 02:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@Robertsky: You mean for 2 weeks. I have protested above but they stood by 331dot no matter what I said. Even when I pointed to another sock above 331dot kept blaming me and as I took a sabbatical I realized the protected articles became obsolete. That is why I crossed the line heavy-heartedly. Flix11 (talk) 02:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

I mean the line for the sock accounts. the only recourse from blocks on sock is the standard offer. take it, come back in 6 months. the 2 weeks was a somewhat standard graduated response given that you had been blocked for the same issue not too long before it happened. as for the sock you have reported, if the admin/CU found no issue, just take it and leave the matter alone (i have my share of failed SPI investigations, i can empathise when the account you reported has no action taken against it) given that they have more tools than us at their disposal to determine the usage of the accounts. if they are really socks, they are good at not slipping up. if not, it's just you being sensitive. – robertsky (talk) 23:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Should the standard offer ever be considered, please be aware that there is a large amount of ip editting from Indonesia on many of the same articles that Flix11 has edited in the past (as an example many stats updates to 2021–22 Premier League come from there and follow exactly the same pattern of editing). These addresses change daily, so it will be nothing other than whack-a-mole to report them individually. Spike 'em (talk) 08:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Agree re Spike'em's comment so I am one of the users who will keep an eye out on the above article at least. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 06:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Such a shame

You were a good editor and then you took the path of the dark side... such a shame. Govvy (talk) 10:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@Govvy: Well 331dot left me with no choice after enforcing the 3RR (which I was short of doing that) and anyone says he is correct even though he is not. And he was so stiff (or being annoying) that he did not give a sid on my sock report to Joplin201017, even though he is a sock of Javito1993. Well thank you and God bless. Please carry on my baton and updating football, will you? Flix11 (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Please review this sigma.toolforge analysis if you are really unbiased (even though you stood by 331dot on such a really excessive 2-week universal block). Maybe you wanna read [this critique on him]. I want justice to be served, but I won't hold my breath. Who am I, I am the bad guy here. Flix11 (talk) 11:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

One more personal attack or other inappropriate post to this page, and I will revoke TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@Bbb23: OK. But will you review this sigma.toolforge analysis? This is not a PA, is it? Flix11 (talk) 11:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

I have revision-deleted the link you posted above, and I echo Bbb's comment: If you continue use your talk page for anything that isn't an unblock request, talk page access will be revoked. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Flix, is this for real. Can't believe. Wikipedia need prolific editors like you. I hope you'll return soon. zoglophie 07:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Such a shame that you can't abide by the terms of your block and continue to ip edit. Spike 'em (talk) 08:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

• More block evasion by Special:contributions/36.81.181.27.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

@Bbb23: do you agree that Special:contributions/112.215.237.222 is currently operated by the same user? That IP address continues to edit Manchester United stats after your IP address block...

And do you also agree the article Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia (2021) should be protected, per page history, a large number of IP addresses have edited it, many of them probably by Flix11 with edit summaries referencing Twitter ([4]) ([5]) ([6]). Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

@Iggy the Swan: The 112. IP isn't as obvious to me. I also noticed that at least in one instance the 112. IP reverted the 36. IP. I don't think there's enough disruption to semi-protect the pandemic article, but you're welcome to take it to WP:RFPP.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Agree, I am not familiar with IP addresses from the 'home' country of this user. If we do see anything like that again, I agree in taking the pandemic page to that RFPP page. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/36.68.219.96 looks like block evasion to me, fyi. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 07:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

This one was more clear to me. Also, unlike some other single IPs, it was more conducive to a range block, so, for the record, Special:contributions/36.68.219.0/24 blocked for one month.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flix11, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Stvbastian (talk) 09:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 01:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

IP address

Idk how this blocked user still can make edits in Wikipedia with IP. This will be a bad example for users who are registered on Wikipedia, if later their accounts are blocked. Based on the IP contributions, i do believe that this IP: 112.215.151.226 and 103.82.14.67 belong to Flix11.Stvbastian (talk) 12:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flix11, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Stvbastian (talk) 12:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Ban from editing

Due to your repeated confirmed block evasion using accounts, you have been banned by the community pursuant to the 3X banning policy. As such if you wish to make an unblock request in the future it will need to go to the community to be decided. More details at AN. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2018 Asian Games Canoeing Slalom.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2018 Asian Games Canoeing Slalom.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2018 Asian Games Taekwondo Poomsae.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2018 Asian Games Taekwondo Poomsae.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Papa John's EFL Trophy.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Papa John's EFL Trophy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Papa John's EFL Trophy.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Papa John's EFL Trophy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)