Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for the help. I'll work on it.Final4one (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC) Still working on appropriate writing style and finding additional references.--Final4one (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Poodle

edit
 

Hi Final4one, I have made some slight changes to the general format and reference format for the edit you made to the Poodle article. These were just pretty minor but please check it is still as you wanted it.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the  button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post.
You shouldn't include this on articles though - I've removed your signature from the Poodle article. Don't worry, sometimes the formatting on Wikipedia can be quite daunting but you will soon get the hang of it!
If you need any help at all, you can contact me on my talk page or why not pop over to the Teahouse where there are always very patient, helpful and experienced editors available to give you a hand. SagaciousPhil - Chat 07:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Final4one. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by gwickwiretalkedits 05:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Final4one. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 03:10, 18 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

Congrats... You asked an awesome question in the Teahouse!

edit

hi! Thanks for your great question about adding images to articles about Pennsylvania. As a native PA resident myself, I am extra excited about your efforts to improve our coverage in this area, but I'm also just psyched to see you interested in becoming a great editor. Come back any time with more great questions!


  Great Question Badge
Awarded to those who have asked a great question on the Teahouse Question Forum.

There are no stupid questions, but some are excellent! Good questions are those that reflect serious curiosity about editing and help others learn.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Ocaasi t | c 21:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Final4one. You have new messages at Final4one's talk page.
Message added 00:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have added the reference section for you, but you should still improve it the other points i mentioned before resubmitting Ntb613 (talk) 00:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Final4one. You have new messages at Sagaciousphil's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mail

edit
 
Hello, Final4one. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Replied to your email! SagaciousPhil - Chat 14:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Teahouse Turns One!

edit

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


  Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Good luck!

edit

Hi, thanks for your email! The pic of Sam was on the bottom, so Apple worked correctly. I hope everything works out with the article you've submitted - I seem to have been playing with my attempts at new articles for months and they are still sitting in my user pages waiting for me to do more work on them. They are at the top of my talk page if you want to have a look? I'm not really brave enough to have them rejected, so I try to learn by practising editing and/or expanding existing articles. Let me know if I can help with anything - or as you know, the Teahouse guys are really good, very experienced (much more than me!) and very patient at explaining things. SagaciousPhil - Chat 09:56, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Article for creation

edit
 
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

Robert Lombardo. Review of changes and feedback please. Thank you.

 ? – PAINE ELLSWORTH CLIMAX! 17:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
The draft Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Lombardo currently isn't submitted for review; you can re-submit it by following the instructions in the lower "submission declined" message box or by adding {{subst:submit}} to the very top.
I have tidied up the references a little, but I don't think they suffice. Several of them don't mention Lombardo at all, and several others seemed to mention him in passing only. The 2012 Chicago Tribune article could do with a link; the title is so generic that I couldn't find it - I found this piece by von Rhein from the same date, but it doesn't mention Lombardo. To be considered notable, he must have been the subject of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Huon (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Final4one. You have new messages at Huon's talk page.
Message added 00:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Chronology of talk pages

edit

Hi Final4one and thanks for stopping by my talkpage. What a great question, but unfortunately, I don't know the why the newest entry appears at the bottom of the talkpage. At the Teahouse, we've tried to do reverse order... newest entry at the top. I think that may confuse people who see it done both ways. I'm really glad you're interested in contributing to wikipedia. There's so much to do!! Enjoy yourself, and stop by my page anytime. Cheers, --Rosiestep (talk) 04:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

And Cheers to you as well! Thanks for the encouragement. Let's keep trying to get newest entries first.Final4one (talk) 04:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think there are several reasons for the order of entries on talk pages. First of all, the "new section" tab on talk pages adds a new section at the end, not at the beginning - probably because otherwise hatnotes would be superseded by the new section. Secondly, reading from top to bottom is the usual style, and chronological lists are usually sorted oldest-first - take the list of Swedish monarchs for an entirely random example. Thirdly, entries within each section are sorted so the newest entries are at the bottom; I'd say it's logical to sort sections as a whole the same way. Huon (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Resume style re-written to conform to encyclopedic format.Final4one (talk) 04:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

edit

R Carlos Nakai entry is one I am still working on. I've written in encyclopedic form and added verifiable reference.Final4one (talk) 04:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Lombardo

edit

I've rewritten some of the sections of that article. I think it passes, but I'm going to wait for the opinion of an admin.--Launchballer 16:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit

  Hello. You have a new message at Sagaciousphil's talk page.

Robert Lombardo

edit

Just to let you know, I've put it in articlespace because I'm not waiting three weeks for it. If it doesn't meet the criteria, it can simply be put back.--Launchballer 13:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Depends on the bolshiness of the editor and because I have no right to move it as an WP:INVOLVED editor.--Launchballer 13:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
It's probably a glitch, I had a similar issue with some of my other articles. The Wikipedia search engine has to index each article that's created, which involves periodic 'sweeping' of the articles. Because there's 6,928,796 articles, that can take a while.--Launchballer 15:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

A cupcake for you!

edit
  I see you have created your first article - congratulations! Here is a little cake for you to celebrate with! SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:29, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply