March 2024

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in China, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Remsense 16:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Longford Parish Council moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Longford Parish Council. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 18:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

If I add sources, will you move it back to the mainspace? Diegg24 (talk) 18:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure! Waqar💬 19:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir Thomas Rich's School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barton Street. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Diegg24! Your additions to Alney Island have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 16:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of William John Veale for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William John Veale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William John Veale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to United States Electoral College. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Diegg24. Thank you for your work on Pino Montano. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for bringing this translation over to .en! All I've done is to add a 'References' heading.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 15:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Longford Parish Council

edit

  Hello, Diegg24. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Longford Parish Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruz Fletcher

edit

Hello Diegg24, in the above AfD, you called for User:Keyofz (who joined in 2007) to be blocked for creating an article previously created by a blocked user CarmenEsparzaAmoux (joined in 2021), a sockpuppet of Jpesch95 (who joined in 2015). However, the article may be notable under WP:GNG and so it is not an offense to create such an article. Please avoid calling for users to be blocked in this way. Thank you, starship.paint (talk / cont) 08:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

2027 in politics moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to 2027 in politics. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is still too far in the future. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Chaotic Enby When can it be moved back? Late 2025/Early 2026? Also, there are 4 other '2027 in x' articles, will those be moved to the draftspace? Diegg24 (talk) 13:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Looking at other "year in politics" articles, 2025 in politics was created on 31 December 2024, 2024 in politics and 2023 in politics were created on 1 January of their respective years, 2022 in politics was created on 28 January 2022, and 2021 in politics was created on 24 October 2020. So, waiting until around late 2026 would be the most reasonable. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
What about the other 2027 articles? Diegg24 (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2031 (January 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AstrooKai was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AstrooKai (Talk) 19:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Diegg24! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AstrooKai (Talk) 19:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply