Deepdistill

This is Deepdistill's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oriol Vinyals (May 28)

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Linked in is not a WP:RS. Needs references in newspapers, magazines, etc.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oriol Vinyals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oriol Vinyals, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 13:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

LinkedIn is no longer used. Please review again. Deepdistill (talk) 17:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Deepdistill! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 13:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oriol Vinyals (May 28)

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

arXiv is not considered a reliable source so should be not be used (see WP:RSP) nor is github. Also, external hyperlinks do not belong in the body so those need to be removed (they link to unreliable sources anyway). The Financial Times article is a solid source. The NYT article is an announcement based largely on what the researchers state so not entirely independent (fine for verification but weak for notability). I suggest a Publications section and list their top three most cited peer-reviewed publications. It may also be helpful to post a note on the draft's talk page outlining which sources, once provided, show they meet WP:NBIO and/or WP:NPROF.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oriol Vinyals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oriol Vinyals, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Could you consider reviewing again? Deepdistill (talk) 17:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, Deepdistill, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Drasticuser (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 20:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

There is probably a good explanation but do please provide one. Also, if you have any affiliation to Oriol Vinyals please do declare it (see Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline). If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes, both are my accounts. I forgot the password to the account Drasticuser, and I didn't connect it with any email ID, so I couldn't recover the password. So, I ended up creating another account Deepdistill. It's not meant to misuse multiple accounts with another person. I do not have any affiliation to Vinyals. Deepdistill (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

That's what I thought but best to ask. Thanks for the reply. S0091 (talk) 16:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Clarification for Notability

The Financial Times article mentioning Vinyals' life story from being a professional starcraft player to building an AI that beats the world's best players at it is enough for notability WP:NBIO.

Vinyals being an honorary professor at University College London and having over 150,000 citations, is sufficient for WP:NPROF.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oriol Vinyals (June 6)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Changes since the previous decline are insufficient to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oriol Vinyals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oriol Vinyals, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic