CompuHacker
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Welcome
editHello, CompuHacker, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DPM 01:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Hansen_chris_2005-1.jpg
edit
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
ResolvedDisputed fair use rationale for Image:Avatar the invasion titlecard.png
edit
Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 06:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
ResolvedOrphaned non-free media (Image:Avatar the invasion titlecard.png)
edit){kind=link}
Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
ResolvedImage:Anons-business-card2.PNG
edit
Thank you. Melesse (talk) 09:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
ResolvedWatch userbox
editI noticed that you are using the {{User:Mistman123/Userboxes/Watch}} template, but only in its simple and most generic form.
Resolved
Thank you.
CompuHacker (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Active Worlds
edit ResolvedYou are currently making unneeded edits to the Active Worlds article. These edits could be counted as vandalism if you continue. Please refrain from making further unnessescary edits. Thank you.
--GSK (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
English sir, can you read it? Please read edit summaries. They help. They really do.
CompuHacker (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:ActiveWorlds icon.png)
edit){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:ActiveWorlds icon.png. J Milburn (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
ResolvedActiveworlds Userbox
edit ResolvedWhy not, instead of putting a picture of the GRS, why not a picture of the Activeworlds Gate? It is the default entry point and would make more sense. --GSK (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
It was the only picture I had on hand at the time, due to the "non free" image being removed. I have a bit more research to do.
CompuHacker (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
ResolvedI have closed this prematurely because of WP:SNOW. Dreamafter (talk) 01:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Current rover mission
editTemplate:Current rover mission has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Kildor (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
ResolvedStop!
editStop editing other messages as you are doing here, here, here and here. This is a violation of policy. Thanks, CWii(Talk|Contribs) 14:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- I would think that:
- The messages are on my own talk page,
- The messages edited were created by bots,
- The titles sum up each message.
- CompuHacker (talk) 15:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Even so, you shouldn't edit others' messages. If it's a violation of Wikipedia policy, it's a violation, no matter which way you look at it. --GSK (talk) 15:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia guidelines concerning this discussion are as follows
- "On your own user talk page, you may remove others' comments, although archiving is generally preferred."
- As a matter of semantics, I removed the comments and not the signatures. Also stated in an above section is
- "As a rule, do not edit others' comments, including signatures. Exceptions are described in the next section."
- I believe that ignoring this rule in this instance is improving Wikipedia. I still maintain that the titles adequately explain what was "discussed" (I never responded) in each section. That is all I have to say right now, enjoy your afternoon.
- Wikipedia guidelines concerning this discussion are as follows
- Even so, you shouldn't edit others' messages. If it's a violation of Wikipedia policy, it's a violation, no matter which way you look at it. --GSK (talk) 15:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
CompuHacker (talk) 16:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- What you are doing is editing comments, though. Just...stop. And to think you wanted administration on Wikipedia. This stuff is only hurting your chances more and more of it ever happening in the future. --GSK (talk) 16:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Really stop. You're not improving it at all. You're making it harder by making users have to look through your history for the messages. And no, not all the messages were from bots. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 12:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- All the messages that were edited are best summed up by their title. Having simply the title should be enough information for any casual reader, and if you really want to read a computer generated readout about something that happened half a year ago, then you can fall back on the history of this page. Three of the four messages were made by bots, something I overlooked before. However, the titles fully convey the message in a single sentence normally conveyed by that and a paragraph AND the title of each section is linked to a long and tedious paragraph that I am sure you, GSK, and everyone else on Wikipedia has read a thousand times before. I really don't want to see it needlessly cluttering the page when the current version will suffice. CompuHacker (talk) 16:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- So will now stop doing this from now on, correct? CWii(Talk|Contribs) 17:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- English much? Anyway, I will stop. Or, I will start offloading image notices to separate pages. CompuHacker (talk) 17:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Club, do us all a favor and stop adding so childish. It gets annoying, not to mention a lot of enemies in life. --GSK (talk) 23:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Just hours after I resolve this matter, back comes GSK. No more! Everything is fine. CompuHacker (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Club, do us all a favor and stop adding so childish. It gets annoying, not to mention a lot of enemies in life. --GSK (talk) 23:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- English much? Anyway, I will stop. Or, I will start offloading image notices to separate pages. CompuHacker (talk) 17:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- So will now stop doing this from now on, correct? CWii(Talk|Contribs) 17:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
ResolvedOut of Body Experiences
editHey.. I didn't know you were into that sort of thing... When I get back to Active Worlds in a couple months, I should definitely recount a vision I had back in August....one I can still remember crystal clear a month later. ;) --The One They Call GSK // talk to me // 06:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Technically, I'm not. I heard it on the radio, tried it that very night, saw myself for 3 seconds, and awoke with a start. It never worked again. CompuHacker (talk) 03:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Resolvedre: xkcd revert
editThe reason there is mouseover text in the lower image is because it is a thumb in the main text and not in the infobox; as far as I know, image captions in thumbs are automatically used as mouseover text, whereas in an infobox the image, image caption, and mouseover text are all given as separate fields. In other words, no user purposely put mouseover text in the "Wikipedian Protester" image, it just shows up because the user gave a caption. If you want to put mouseover text on the infobox image, that's ok, but the mouseover text should either be the same as the image caption ('Panel from "Philosophy"') or should specifically attribute the mouseover text to Munroe (i.e., "The mouseover text for this comic was...."). Personally, I don't see any encyclopaedic value in adding mouseover text for that image; the purpose of the article is to inform readers about xkcd, not to replicate xkcd. That's just my two cents. —Politizer( talk • contribs ) 01:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
ResolvedLast revert
edithttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mac_Mini&curid=19769681&diff=246289412&oldid=246288542
I believe policy states it should remain what it was originally. I may be mistaken
Thanks CompuHacker (talk) 14:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- We retain the English variety used in an article's first non-stub version when we have no good reason to change it. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. —David Levy 14:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
^_^
--(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)-- 07:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
ResolvedBomb icon
editWell that icon looked pretty low quality. But I guess something like this could be worked in: http://openclipart.org/people/mcol/mcol_bomb.svg I'm not sure where, though. -- Borb (talk) 01:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
ResolvedMoving the page "Anonymous (group)" to something more descriptive
editHello there, I was wondering if you have any thoughts on the matter of moving Anonymous (group) to something more descriptive of the actual nature of the phenomenon (i.e. Anonymous (internet culture). We are now debating this on the talk page. Your opinion would be most welcome. Spidern (talk) 16:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Resolvedwtf are you talking about
editwhat's with your edit to my page? something about trolling
i do not troll wikipedia! i like wikipedia, it's good to me, i try to make constructive edits and help the community! Travis (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
ResolvedFile:Pyramidtiny.PNG listed for deletion
editAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pyramidtiny.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
ResolvedO_O
editOh hi! How are you doing this mighty fine day? Haven't seen you edit for a while. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 16:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
ResolvedPortal:MIDI
edit ResolvedAs requested the content of the deleted pages:
There you go. --The Evil IP address (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Osmos4.PNG
edit
Resolved
Thanks for uploading File:Osmos4.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
non-free rational on free image
edit ResolvedYou recently uploaded File:Neko_animated.gif tagged with a nonfree rational and a free license, if you have done this because the upload form added it automatically and you don't believe that the screenshot is non-free then read below.
License for images
editWhen I uploaded the File:Acid3detailSafari4.png and File:Acid3detailMidori0.1.9.png the form asked me if I got that shot from a GPL program, and so the screenshot file is GPL too. I choosed that option uploading the file. I do not understand what I had to write more and in which field of images file, to prevent deleting. Can you help me? Thanks --Efa (talk) 14:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- The files have a free license and a non-free rational.You can't be free and non-free at the same time.Why did you use the non-free rational template, was your intention to uses something like this {{information}} or did you believe that all files need a rational?Btw possible unfree file is not a deletion discution.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
I never chosed the templete, I followed the guided steps, and the template was chosed automatically.
I describe the procedure I used for upload, so you can explain where is the error:
- clicked to left menu, Upload file, point to https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload
- Chosed the link "A screenshot taken of a movie, TV program, computer game, web site, computer program, music video, or other such source" because the file is a screenshot of a computer program. Point to: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang=en-screenshot&wpUploadDescription={{Non-free use rationale
|Article =
|Description =
|Source =
|Portion =
|Low_resolution =
|Purpose =
|Replaceability =
|other_information =
}}
- filled the fields, leaving empty the fields not needed, as say here "If you are uploading a screenshot which is not copyrighted (such as freely-licensed software), you do not need to include a fair use rationale."--Efa (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm got to talk to someone about that form, ok so here is how things stand only use non-free rational if you are uploading a unfree image ex:screenshot of copyrighted program etc. or image with unfree elements like screenshot of internet explorer (fairuse rational for iexplorer) viewing wikipedia (free wikipedia web page screenshot).The reason it ads a Non-free use rationale by default its because 99% of screenshots uploaded are unfree. So if you want to upload a 100% free image to wikipedia and the standard options give you ex:<Chosed the link "A screenshot taken of a movie, TV program, computer game, web site, computer program, music video, or other such source"> produse a rational by default try the Entirely my own work option. Or better yet if the image is 100% free, upload direct to commons. We are currently in the process of moving all free images to commons and your files will get moved ther eventually anyway.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
I hope that more than 1% of the software is uncopyrighted ;-) In any case I'm not using Wiki Commons, because my account has different username there, and my user is busy, so I cannot unify them I also hope that, but we systematically moved and are moving to commons free screen shots and other free stuff so it will get there .Eventually there will bee 1% free stuff on en wikipedia the rest of the 99% free will be on commons.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 05:30, 14 January 2010 (UTC) --Efa (talk) 23:21, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Free use image template
editYou have tagged 3 images that I uploaded on Subtext as conflicting license. But that was the default generated wikitext since I used the image upload wizard/script. And the free use template does not exist/has been deleted. I've not intentionally tagged my images as free nonfree but Wikipedia is designed that way.
So what do you want me to do? -- Tom Jenkins (reply) 14:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- If the images are free replace the rational with the {{information}} template and remove the {{conflicted-license}} tag.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- see License for images section in the 2010 partial collapsible section above--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Images updated. That wizard script needs to change. See if you can get it done. -- Tom Jenkins (reply) 15:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Upload form
edit{{adminhelp}}
someone please update the upload form so it doesn't add nonfree rational to free screenshots a radio button free non-free that add information and rational respectively or whatever you think is apropriet.See above discussion and License for images section in the 2010 partial collapsible section for reference on the problem.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- We already have a notice on the upload form for that (see here). Though I doubt the English Wikipedia will do much else in that regard, you can propose the change at the village pump. Blurpeace 01:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- PS.
Thank you for uploading free images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'file' namespace from the drop down box (or see [1]). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Digital on screen graphic illustration descrepancy?
edit ResolvedI just typed random time on the image. Does it have to be same as the time the original image was taken? I don't get what you're saying. A different version http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DOG_Jimbo_w_Time.jpg even just says 10:10 am. If you think it's "WRONG!", why don't you just replace the image? tablo (talk) 21:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
edit Resolved
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NW (Talk) 01:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Just kidding ;) NW (Talk) 01:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Warning
edit Resolved
Welcome to Wikipedia (again). Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your edits to User:Jimbo Wales appeared to be constructive, at least in my opinion. However, because you offered a barnstar for being warned, your edit has now been considered unconstructive, and thus you are receiving this message. In addition, Silver seren has undone your edit, but I warned you first, so they're probably angry that I beat them to this. Anyway, please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
ResolvedHi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:30, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Resolved
Template:ActiveWiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Vhdfile.png
edit
ResolvedA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vhdfile.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fleet Command (talk) 00:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Win95files.png listed for deletion
edit ResolvedA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Win95files.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 08:44, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Win95files.png
edit
Resolved Thanks for uploading File:Win95files.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Merrover has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
ResolvedFair use rationale for File:Yahoo2.png
edit
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yahoo2.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 19:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- I took care of that for you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, mate. I certainly wasn't going to. ζompuλacker (tlk) 19:33, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- I took care of that for you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
ResolvedWell, here we are again.
editIt's always such a pleasure. Remember when you tried to kill me twice? Oh, how we laughed and laughed, except I wasn't laughing. Under the circumstances, I've been shockingly nice.
Hello again, CompuHacker. It's been a while. Well, I guess if you count a couple of days as "a while." I'm back and here to wreak havoc on this place called Wikipedia. We should really do challenge co-op sometime. All of it. Maybe we can do a 24 hour sort of deal even though it probably won't take 24 hours. Cheers. -- GSK (t ● c) 21:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
ResolvedNon-free rationale for File:U3launch.PNG
edit Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:U3launch.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Manufacture a rationale, per other software pages. Maybe shop the Geek Squad logo out, I realize now, 6 years later, that it's not a standard feature. ζompuλacker (tlk) 17:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
RFC on cross-namespace links from Jimmy Wales to user:Jimbo Wales
edit
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Jimmy Wales#Rfc: Links to user:Jimbo Wales. John Vandenberg (chat) 12:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh, hello there!
edit
Smash!
You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.
G'day. --GSK (talk ● evidence) 18:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Yahoo2.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Yahoo2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Personalspace1.PNG listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Personalspace1.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Personalspace2.PNG listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Personalspace2.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, CompuHacker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Into-the-wild-green-yonder-audience.JPG
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Into-the-wild-green-yonder-audience.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Elisfkc (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
editHi. GSK (t • c) 17:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, CompuHacker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, CompuHacker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, CompuHacker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Flatgrass" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flatgrass. Since you had some involvement with the Flatgrass redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. BDD (talk) 14:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
"≣" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ≣. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 14#≣ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Wificropped.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not pd, per c:Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Noticeboards_and_signs
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Temu flag fixes
editHi, I have just posted Talk:Temu (company)#Request for more clean up and removing flag to ask for fixes to the page about Temu (company) that should address the final issues raised in a flag for the page. I have a conflict of interest as an employee of Temu. I want to follow the correct process for COI users. Since you are a member of the WikiProject for Internet Culture, which is relevant to the page, I thought you possibly be interested in reviewing the proposal. Temu’s app has been the most downloaded phone app in the United States in recent months. Thanks in advance for your consideration! Snowy2000 (talk) 03:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)