Celebral
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Tahir Majeed. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
The article Tahir Majeed has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NW (Talk) 00:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Selfpublished sources are not Reliable
editSelfpublished sources such as books published by Authorhouse are not acceptable as reliable sources. Active Banana (talk) 19:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Tahir Majeed. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Self published content such as works from AuthorHouse are not Reliable sources. Active Banana (talk) 19:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Edit war warning
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tahir Majeed. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Active Banana (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2010 (UTC)