User talk:ButterCashier/Archive 1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2603:8080:200:5519:89CD:EDD2:B89B:5236 in topic 22 March 2023

Welcome!

edit

Hello, ButterCashier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  SK2242 (talk) 14:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polium (console) (July 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VersaceSpace was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
--VersaceSpace 🌃 16:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ButterCashier! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --VersaceSpace 🌃 16:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rec.arts.drwho

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rec.arts.drwho requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 10:12, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi ButterCashier! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:58, Wednesday, September 7, 2022 (UTC)

Doctor Who photo captions

edit

Please realize that for captions that are not full sentences, we do not include a final period. Only if the caption is a full sentence do we do that. See MOS:CAPFRAG. You some of your changes were right, but you should go back through and undo those that are done incorrectly. Masem (t) 12:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the information. I have reverted some changes I made. ButterCashier (talk) 12:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who (season 15), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graham Williams. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Fellowship of the Ring (volume) vs "the Fellowship of the Ring" (character group)

edit

Hi, thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia. Please note, however, that the character group called the Fellowship (of the Ring) is not the same as the first volume of The Lord of the Rings. The definite article "the" for the character group is properly in lower case; and the term is properly in Roman not Italics: in both cases differing from the title of the first volume of Tolkien's book. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:23, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Thanks for informing me, I was going through every page that linked to "Fellowship of the Ring" and appending them with a "The". Many of them refer to the book or film without a "The". Apologies about the error. ButterCashier (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I know; it's a very minor fix. Actually I'd dispute whether it is even wrong to write the volume's title without the definite article; it's a common redirect, and a common practice in British English. I certainly wouldn't want to spend a lot of time on the matter, however. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
It's only today that I've been seeing you revert vandalism around here, but I have edit-conflicted with you a few times already. Good work! SunilNevlaFan 14:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! ButterCashier (talk) 14:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome! I also suggest using these templates to warn vandalizing editors after reverting their edits. SunilNevlaFan 14:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Keep up the great work! Moops T 15:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you a lot! ButterCashier (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Happy to! Glad to see you in the trenches with me. :) Moops T 19:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Excessive thanks

edit

Thank you for all of the thanks you are giving me on the vandalism I revert, but could you please tone it down a little? I don't really have a problem with it, it's just flooding my notifications and I don't really need to be thanked for every anti-vandalism edit I make. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry! Thanks for informing me. ButterCashier (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
No problem! Also, just a little tip, when reverting vandalism, if the same user has made multiple other consecutive edits to the article, check to see if all of them area vandalism. I've noticed a few times that you only revert one of a user's consecutive edits to an article when all of them should've been reverted. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:55, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank train

edit

Lets keep this thank train going! You thank, I thank! We keep the reverting going and going. This is fun! :) Moops T 20:55, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oh wow. That is funny. I just saw the message above hahaha. I guess everyone has a different preference on the "thanking". Me? I am FOR it! Moops T 20:56, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'll revert more tomorrow, this has unintentionally become a hobby of mine. Go on as you wish, I am to bed. ButterCashier (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Keep up the good work you have been doing till date against vandalism on Wiki! :)

Regards MMJ TheIndianWikiFreak (talk) 11:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! ButterCashier (talk) 11:45, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Warning those vandals

edit

I appreciate your fight against vandalism a lot. Similar to SunilNevaFan's suggestion above, I recommend warning more editors you revert, preferably all of them, with the warning templates. Happy editing! ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 13:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion, I will try to be more proficient. ButterCashier (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A goat for you!

edit
 

Because you are a "goat" (greatest of all time!) of vandalism reverting!

Moops T 14:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Um, thanks! ButterCashier (talk) 14:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dagored, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dawn of the Dead.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Recent Changes Barnstar
For your anti-vandalism work! I look forward to seeing you around! :) SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 13:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you lots! ButterCashier (talk) 13:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for quick reversion of World Happiness Report

edit

Moments ago I Googled to World Happiness Report and saw obvious trolling nonsense in the opening paragraph. I clicked History and noted that you had already reverted the sabotage. After only four minutes! (But my Google-hit came exactly during the 4-minute window.)

Thank you for this quick action. ALMOST enough to restore my faith in, and affection for, Wikipedia! Jamesdowallen (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure. ButterCashier (talk) 13:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have two (2) replies at User_talk:209.251.255.73#September_2022

edit

You need to read them. Both of them. 209.251.255.73 (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

John Hamblin article

edit

It doesn't state in the corresponding reference had Hamblin passed away in Sydney, New South Wales, despite being a Sydney newspaper, but article states he long reside din Hobart, Tasmania, so not sure if info is correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.8.43 (talk) 08:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

If the citation states the info as written, it's correct. I reverted your edit quite hastily so it may have been an error on my part, in which case I apologise. ButterCashier (talk) 08:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Create for me an article please

edit

create for me an article to edit my works. Vincent njagi (talk) 09:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You can find how to make an article at WP:YFA. If you need help, you can ask at the Teahouse or Help Desk. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 09:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unexplained Revert

edit

Hi @ButterCashier, I noticed you reverted my edit using RW on the page Bernardo Añor Jr. in which I was trying to fix the hatnote to correctly redirect to the main article instead of redirecting to another redirect. I would like to know why you undid my edit, or if you assumed my edit as vandalism. Thanks! Raydann (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Raydann, I am terribly sorry, I've restored the page to your version. I've been reverting so many pages recently, yours must have been one I quickly assumed to be an error so I reverted it. Apologies. ButterCashier (talk) 11:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nothing to worry about at all, even 90% of my own contributions consists of reverting vandalism. Thanks for protecting Wikipedia. Happy editing! Raydann (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For countering the vandals on Genshin Impact. I saw it was protected and looked at the edit history and holy crap that was a bad case of vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 12:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! ButterCashier (talk) 12:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Supernova

edit

Hey; I wanted to do that one! Instead, I was stuck on a conversation about the pronunciation of user talk:Adakiko#Paprika   Adakiko (talk) 14:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Don't worry, I'm spending a lot of time fixing wikilinks in other places, putting in/removing colons, dashes, that kind of thing, it's a never-ending quest. The revert on the Supernova page was not absolute, I thought, since a supernova is a powerful explosion, it could be considered a very powerful explosion, neutrally. It was the sentence "I love stars!" that seemed more out of place, anyway I've re-worded it now. ButterCashier (talk) 14:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Apply for rollback?

edit

Hey! I noticed that you've been using RedWarn a lot with your anti-vandalism efforts and I"m curious, have you considered applying for WP:ROLLBACK permissions? It would help you out a lot with anti-vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I've been using RedWarn since you suggested I revert all changes by some users, rather than just one revert which may leave some previous vandalism. I thought that meant using Rollback but since I had not access for it, I installed RedWarn, which works. Is there something advantageous to Rollback that RedWarn doesn't have? I might apply but I thought I should get a little more experience first. Thanks for the suggestion and happy editing! ButterCashier (talk) 18:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Actually, rollback can be used hand-in-hand with Twinkle and RedWarn/Ultraviolet since both tools allow the use of rollback with other features. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for informing me, I'll think about it. ButterCashier (talk) 18:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Alright sounds good. I'd also like to note that it allows for the use of more advanced tools/programs such as WP:HUGGLE and WP:SWViewer (which I myself use a lot). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Piping redirects

edit

Hello. In general, WP:NOTBROKEN says we aren't supposed to pipe working redirects. I was wondering if you had a particular reason for this edit to James Caton, where you piped [[Year 10]] to [[Year Ten|Year 10]]? or you just weren't aware of the guidance. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I was not aware of that guidance and have been correcting all instances of such mistakes from Years 1 - 13 that I could find. I was unaware it was apparently bad to do, thus I ought to cease. Thank you for informing me. ButterCashier (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
No problem, glad I could save you some work. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Could you explain your reversion?

edit

Hello! Could you explain this revert? It is very clear that 51.155.47.241 is breaking the reference link and remove some of the materials without explanation. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:49, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, sorry, I tried reverting the page just after you had so accidentally reverted your page. Realising I had done this, I deleted the tab, hoping it wouldn't have loaded my revert, instead of doing the sensible thing and undoing my mistake. I have now restored your version of the page. It was my error. ButterCashier (talk) 12:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
No worries! You are doing a great job at reverting vandalism! Have a great day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:38, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022

edit

You can read the text itself which is clearly spreading hate for a social activist just because she speaks for her religion without being ashamed of it. the Efforts by her for the social causes are cleverly hidden. I just added the social works she is doing and removed the unnecessary statements. Wish your reply Kenddjss (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I thought your edits on the page Sadhvi Rithambara:
  • had not enough citations for some claims (e.g. "She has opened many centers for women empowerment and her first center was in Jwala Nagar, Delhi, 2003. In her ashram, for the safety of women, arrangements have been made for the training of horse riding, gun handling, aerial firing, karate etc. She also runs orphanages and ashrams for widows.")
  • was not neutral at points (e.g. "She does not want to see any child orphan in the world, due to which she adopts orphan children and tries to give them love." - a personal view with no citation comes across as a factual statement but perhaps I am wrong)
  • removed a lot of text without explanation
  • had typographical errors (but this matters less)
Hence, I reverted your edit. Maybe I am mistaken, I do not know much about the subject. ButterCashier (talk) 09:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ok thank you bro have a nice day Kenddjss (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

oh no Ok If I type She says that"..." would it become neutral? can't you see the previous version which clearly holds her responsible for 2000 deaths without any proof? Can a person be free after killing 2000 people? How can you think that the previous one was neutral. I hope I am talking to a human not a robot. I typed the thank you one when I thought you kept my changes. Kenddjss (talk) 09:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

bro the Country has a responsible court and a person responsible for 2000 deaths can't roam free in India. The information in that version is saying that she was involved in the act that led to death of 2000 people but truth to be told, The 2000 deaths occured in 2002 year and the demolition was done in 1991. how can she be responsible for riots 9 years later. wish your reply Kenddjss (talk) 09:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am not too knowledgeable about the subject, I saw that you deleted information without sufficient explanation and added sections that did not seem neutral. If you want to add some information, go ahead but make sure what you write can be checked with a reliable source. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Billy Walker

edit

You have just informed me that my comment was removed. Surely having errors corrected on Wiki is the way forward. Why anyone can put misleading information on there is beyond me. In future I am not going to bother correcting the errors. C J "Villa nut" Abbott (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for editing Wikipedia. The edit you did on the Billy Walker (footballer, born 1897) was written, I thought, not neutrally by use of the declarative "fact!" at the end. Had the edit simply been "in a Nottingham hospital" that seems more neutral. There's no citation for the information (though to me it seems likely) - had that been all you wrote, I do not think I'd have reverted it. Apologies if my hasty reversion caused concern, I undoubtedly can improve my ability to help many edits, rather than reverting completely as I often do. ButterCashier (talk) 18:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Tartis for you!

edit
  You win a Tartis!
Great work keeping the vandals outside the gates. Please keep up the great work in our space-time! Adakiko (talk) 12:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I've actually been in that room, too! ButterCashier (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
You went to the UK studio? I'm jealous! Was it a Dr. Who pilgrimage? Adakiko (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
There was a lot of interesting stuff. The Experience isn't open anymore I think, unfortunately. There was a room with Silents upside down which I ironically forgot about till I saw them. ButterCashier (talk) 13:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Three consecutive times I've tried to revert a Vandal, and... BAM, you've already done it! Thanks for keeping the Wiki safe! AdmiralAckbar1977 (talk) 14:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot! ButterCashier (talk) 14:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

hi

edit

Hi, I believe my edit is true, hard to communicate here what is your email Albert Zollo Official (talk) 15:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello and thanks for editing! I reverted one of your edits on the Newman College, Perth page since there were no citations for the information you added, and you used the adjective "unfortunately" which is not neutral. If there was a citation to the information you added, I think it would be more fitting. If you wish to discuss editing on that page further, I think it's better to use the Talk Page, rather than my user talk page. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 16:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
mister buttercashier i regret to inform you that I did not use Wikipedia yesterday so how you made an edit to my post I don't know but I have never once edited wikipedia 47.225.221.50 (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is abt me bro who are you Albert Zollo Official (talk) 05:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Article privacy

edit

Hello Butter cashier, around 14:15 on 18th September 2022, I made an unnecessary edit to Clemen Chiang's article. In the version history of the wiki page, it shows the edit which includes his son's name. For privacy purposes, could you help remove this version out of the version history so his name does not appear anymore?

Regards Johanmattinson226 (talk) 13:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Johanmattinson226 see WP:OVERSIGHT. Sungodtemple (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Butter, I suggest reading Streisand effectBlaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I know of it, I'm sorry, I didn't know what to do. It's been resolved to my knowledge now. ButterCashier (talk) 15:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

E

edit

Why you my edit will be delete why what are reason for that tell me on my mail on the great professor physics in mathematics [email protected] 2409:4081:9B97:965:0:0:C509:9D0D (talk) 02:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Regarding your edit on the Compactness theorem page, the phrase "is a very important wiwo function by Harshit jain" seemed not neutral to me, as well as not fitting with the manual of style used for such a page on Wikipedia. Hence, I reverted the edit. I hope that helps. ButterCashier (talk) 07:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

13 October 2022

edit

Hello I’m sorry I was in the wrong Thanks for letting me know — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:BA0:9E00:8196:4FCD:72BF:1E77 (talk) 09:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Rollback granted

edit
 

Hi ButterCashier. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ {sting} 17:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! ButterCashier (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Amazing Race 7

edit

Hello! You reverted my edit in this section but those details (the non-elimination penalty and the order of arrival) are shown/explained plainly in the TV episode. Doesn't this count as a primary source that is not interpretative? "no original research" 136.158.65.53 (talk) 08:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for editing! I see you have been busy editing many pages concerning The Amazing Race - I saw one of the edits and reverted it due to a lack of sources which was a mistake, I think, for it was like the other edits. Sorry, you're right. ButterCashier (talk) 08:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
136.158.65.53 has been invaluable in helping to clean up the Amazing Race articles. You can trust that their edits have been proper and appropriate. Bgsu98 (talk) 13:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

stub

edit

but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Chapman_Dam is a stub, its obvious, how is it vandalism if it is a stub? 169.244.131.100 (talk) 12:37, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I reverted your edit since you added lots of redundant blank lines. The page is stub-class again. ButterCashier (talk) 12:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Gameplay/ or Game-play

edit

I edited that article due to it popping up red on the spellchecker I use, I don't know if it may be wrong or not, but I believe the way I put it was right. Ldwitt07 (talk) 13:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for editing. "Gameplay" is a word, from what I've learned, and there is a page here with that title. ButterCashier (talk) 13:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Update CEO

edit

Hello. You removed my edit because I did not cite the claim for a new CEO in the company bio, but I do not see other pages citing or linking to their CEO. The information is readily found on the company website which is linked at the bottom of the bio. Kinetic15 (talk) 17:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for editing Wikipedia! I reverted the edit you made because I didn't see a source but if you added one, it would be fine. Sorry for not responding earlier. ButterCashier (talk) 07:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Happy Birthday!

edit
 
Wishing ButterCashier a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Woo! Thanks! ButterCashier (talk) 14:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
In appreciation of all the work you have put into reverting unconstructive edits.

You often conflict with my efforts to revert vandals, haha! Riverbend21 (talk) 08:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! ButterCashier (talk) 08:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

A puppy for you!

edit
  A puppy for you!
I just saw "i regularly think about dying" here on your user page. Please accept this WikiLove pup as my gift.

Hope you're feeling better soon <3 Riverbend21 (talk) 11:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.163.1.15.238 (talk) 15:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Atsuko Tanaka (voice actress)
added a link pointing to Pokémon: Black and White
Yasunori Matsumoto
added a link pointing to Pokémon: Black and White

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why did you revert my edits?

edit

You reverted my edits in List_of_storms_named_Doris. 🌀 SuperTyphoonNoru 🌀 SuperTyphoonNoru (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it was an error and has been rectified. Sorry. ButterCashier (talk) ButterCashier (talk) 08:49, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi, okay. Have a nice day. 🌀 SuperTyphoonNoru 🌀 SuperTyphoonNoru (talk) 08:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

i didn't do vandalism

edit

First Love (After School single album) in this article, I put the correct songwriter information see the [1] this link 작사 means lyrics (by) and 작곡 means composed (by) 121.133.40.84 (talk) 11:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for editing. Sorry, I revert a lot of vandalism and quickly assumed your edit was. It's reverted now. ButterCashier (talk) 11:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! :)

edit

Thanks for all you do. I remember I once received a thanks from you and well I was overly excited about receiving a thanks from someone I really respected and I wasn't quite sure what to do. I am well aware it is a bit late for a thanks on that but well... Yeah. Who knows I might just see your name while I am reverting vandalism. P. S. While I was scrolling through your talk page I realized that you thank people a lot. Is it a habit or you just never realized. P. P. S Just want to say I appreciate your work. P. P. P. S Just wanted to write that. Wikiwow*_* (talk) 14:18, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Brian Blessed

edit

I wonder could you explain the vandalism warning you added? Thank you. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for editing! I saw your edit on the Brian Blessed page, appending the word "Enland" and thought it vandalism, hence the warning. It appears you made a typo and hastily added the edit without previewing it first. Perhaps I should remove the warning then. ButterCashier (talk) 11:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Typos aren't generally seen as vandalism worthy of a block warning. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 11:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I apologise, it was a hastily enacted event and I have striked through the original text. ButterCashier (talk) 11:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for combating vandalism! Also, the little thanks that you give me are very kind. ― Dulcetia 10:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! There was quite a lot but it's finished now, a source was eventually found. ButterCashier (talk) 11:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

PROD

edit

Prodding Ice Spice (who is quite famous and has two sub-articles about her songs) was definitely an odd move, but I'm just letting you know that I removed it and reverted the page back to its usual state. Thanks! —VersaceSpace 🌃 11:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I had never heard of them, and saw only the latest edit, which was a mostly-empty page, hence my action. Thanks for reverting the page. ButterCashier (talk) 11:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
I understand! Before you PROD an article, best practice is to look in the page history, but it's okay. We all make off-the-cuff decisions that made sense to us at the time. —VersaceSpace 🌃 11:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Special Barnstar
Thank you for your tireless work to revert vandalism and fix articles, and especially for thanking so many users when they do the same. It is greatly appreciated! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 11:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you lots! I like the colours. ButterCashier (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

You Got The Love

edit

I was about to hit Publish when I saw you fixed it, thanks. The Shamming Man has appeared. Sham me / Where I've shammed 15:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure. Thanks for editing. ButterCashier (talk) 15:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Double spaces

edit

Hello. I can see you've been around a while and expect you knew this, but removing double spaces from wikitext doesn't normally affect the displayed page. Double spacing between sentences is standard in some variants of English, so articles such as Ood are debatably better with the double spaces left in. I do appreciate the efforts you're making, but similar activities such as typo fixing might make a more visible and uncontroversial improvement. Thanks, Certes (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for informing me of the futility of my edits, I'll do some other ones henceforth. ButterCashier (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
See MOS:DOUBLESPACE. – S. Rich (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atsuko Tanaka (voice actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pokémon: Black and White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Alt description on Super Mario Bros. (film)

edit

May I ask why you think those boots are only "moderately" large? They go up to the knees and are much larger than normal boots you can buy at a store. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Basically, following the edit of "very large boots", I wanted to alter it in some way, thinking it perhaps not entirely neutral, hence removed the adjective "very". Then, you appended the description with the adjective "abnormally". I wanted to have the most recent edit still, and thought to alter your edit to my "moderately", which still seemed fitting to me. However, it was not an entirely logical idea and you are free to revert the edit, perhaps I ought to. Thank you for your inquiry. ButterCashier (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Joke edit summaries

edit

I get the humour, but could you stop doing these? They don't help explain anything to anyone about your edit and could confuse. Thanks. Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I do beg your pardon. ButterCashier (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Is this and this also part of the hilarity? I also notice that, despite promising above to desist you continue to pointlessly remove double spaces. Are you Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia or just to waste your time and everyone else's? Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Based on the current state of mind, the waste of time will terminate fairly soon, as all desire. ButterCashier (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
You seem to be a WikiGnome. I'd classify myself as one too. It's neither a compliment nor an insult. Wikipedia needs a variety of people, and gnomes can make a very useful contribution in tidying the articles written by others and helping organise and link them. Certes (talk) 21:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Seem to be. Seemed to be. Apply past tense in all future presentations concerning this subject, it's gone. ButterCashier (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi ButterCashier, I noticed another off-topic edit summary here (now deleted by another administrator), which contained a personal attack/threat. That is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please do not do it again. GoodnightmushTalk 21:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
No response here could I write that would be sufficient an explanation or apology. ButterCashier (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello, ButterCashier, given some of your comments today, I'm wondering if things are okay for you right now. Wikipedia is a great place to come and work on improving articles but not a great place to get help for whatever you might be going through. Do you have anyone you can talk to about ups and downs in your life? Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  Liliana's Barnstar
B l i m p LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 10:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks!(?) Interesting design. ButterCashier (talk) 10:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
No problem. The design is based on Liliana Vess' tiara. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 11:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse

edit

Just a FYI, whenever an article has a category link [[Category:Like this| ]], it means that it'll be "pinned" on top of the category, such as with Teahouse being on top of Category:Tea houses. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 11:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The knowledge has been attained, thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 11:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Logan's Run (film)

edit

Please review WP:IPCV. Pop culture references must be accompanied by a secondary source as a means of establishing that the pop culture reference is considered significant in some manner. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Email

edit

Hi ButterCashier, I just sent you an email (I dislike {{ygm}} template notifications); please let me know if it didn't go through. Primefac (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit
You have been blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges in relation to information which has been removed from Wikipedia's public records.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en wikimedia.org.

Administrators: Information which has been oversighted was considered when this block was placed. Therefore the Oversight team or the Arbitration Committee must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing oversight blocks without permission from an oversighter risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

I just want to emphasize that indefinite does not mean infinite. Please refer to Primefac's email for more on this. Barkeep49 (talk) 04:07, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

concern for you

edit

hello buttercashier, i'm sorry if this is an overstep, i've noticed a number of concerning edits on the suicide prevention page, implying that you may be feeling unwell. i'd like to extend a hand; please reach out if you'd like to talk (i can provide my twitter if that is okay), or there are many resources available to you to consult should you wish. i am thinking of you and i really do hope things get better soon. Strawbetti (talk) 04:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Imposter Factory

edit

Hi, this is Fortunewriter, I would like to thank you for making an article for Imposter Factory because I also improve more details like plots and developments that I found from the draft article. It would be a big help for you. Fortunewriter (talk) 14:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure. If I'd played the game, I would have attempted to write about the plot but I haven't yet. Thanks for contributing! ButterCashier (talk) 17:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome, but I'm very sorry for your exclusion (blocked user like that) and I heard about your dramas. I am really hope to take care of your health, okay. I'll help Impostor Factory (your game page) for sure to improve it as well.
Good luck and get well soon! Fortunewriter (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
You should capitalise the word "steam", to "Steam" for the image. It is not that important but I noticed it. Thanks anyway. ButterCashier (talk) 15:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Take care of yourself!

edit

RCP on Wikipedia can be tough! Take care of yourself. Email me if you want to talk. Best wishes Adakiko (talk) 10:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Polium (console)

edit

  Hello, ButterCashier. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polium (console), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sending love

edit

Hey ButterCashier!

I just wanted to check in on you and make sure you are doing alright! Please reach out to me if you ever want to talk! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 18:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

How is it going?

edit
 

This little kitten is worried about you, and so am I. I really appreciated your work, and would like to see you back when you are feeling better.

Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 11:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Moving forward

edit

Hi ButterCashier. You have been unblocked - Barkeep49 did that earlier. You are now free to edit again. I note that you got into a bit of conflict over removing spaces in articles. If something like that happens again, and you'd like some advice on what to do, please get in touch with me. SilkTork (talk) 16:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Welcome back! Thank you for your counter-vandalism efforts  

*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 14:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! ButterCashier (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back

edit

I was a bit surprised when you thanked me for an edit I did and saw that you've been unblocked. If you'd like to continue chatting with me on Discord then just let me know here and I'll unblock you on there (I only blocked you because your messages were a bit... disturbing imho but since you seem to be doing a bit better now I'll unblock you). Regardless, welcome back. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

So happy to see you back in recent changes!!! Hope you're doing well.

LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 16:14, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I hope you are well too. ButterCashier (talk) 18:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Welcome back!

dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

1, Glad to see you back again. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 18:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the thankses (thankii?)

edit

I really appreciate the Thanks (what's the plural of thanks?) you've given to me for some of my edits/reverts, it makes it all worthwhile. MaterialWorks (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure. One can thank too often, as noted previously, so I try not to overstate it. ButterCashier (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stop changing the page I edited pls

edit

Just stop 83.4.100.135 (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Apologies if I made an error but your edits did not seem neutral to me, hence I reverted them. ButterCashier (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Simpson (police officer)

edit

Hallo! It would be really helpful if you could put a rationale on the Talk page if you're reverting edits without obvious justification, please. Did you realise you also removed the COI template from the page? Thanks. Semyon-patras (talk) 21:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Apologies if I made an error, I was reverting a lot of vandalism and acted too hastily. I will try not to cause such contrivance again. ButterCashier (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Because you thanked me

edit
  ButterCashier, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...
 YOU'RE WELCOME!
It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! User:DoebLoggs (talk)

11:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC) DoebLoggs (talk) 10:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Operation Y and Shurik's Other Adventures

edit

Hello. Coward (character) is seen on the picture too. There are three men. 83.174.234.78 (talk) 11:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I apologise, I am not familiar with the material and interpreted your edit as vandalism. Obviously, I was mistaken, thank you for informing me. I have reverted the page back to your edit. Happy editing! ButterCashier (talk) 11:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Have a nice day! 89.189.156.151 (talk) 03:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editing at User talk:Truthstan

edit

Please stop reverting edits on this user talk page. Editors are allowed to blank their user talk pages. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh. I am sorry! Since they had been vandalising, I thought it was right to keep the warnings on their page in case they try to do more. I shan't do it again, thank you for informing me. ButterCashier (talk) 09:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, ButterCashier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Samuel R Jenkins (talk) 09:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, but I have been here for a while! ButterCashier (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Re. Hot Topic revert

edit

Hi, you may want to double check your revert of my edit of Hot Topic at Special:Diff/1135380658, actually it was correcting a previous vandalism. - 111.220.33.85 (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I reverted my edit. ButterCashier (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

25 January 2023

edit

RE revision to Caithness article and removing the fact that we spoke Norn. I live in Caithness, and have studied it's history since I was a child, Wikipedia's continued insistence that we spoke Gaelic en masse is entirely erroneous and thus I want the truth published. Your own article on Norn states that there is no written evidence left of the language, but you still have the article without reliable citation. I have spoken to countless Caithness historians of this fact, we still spoke Norn. Truthfully no longer care if you Revert it, but please stop going around acting like Wikipedia is an authoritive source on anything. Anyone can edit it, and clearly you prefer to perpetuate the tartan and shortbread myth of the SNP that we're all kilt wearing, haggis chasing cheucters. How's your Gaelic Igch Meich, Mcharriadh Heu. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C11:8200:10BA:F54B:2CA:838C (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for editing. I reverted your edit on the Caithness page since you claimed Norn was the language, without any citation. Wikipedia benefits as a tool for assessing what is true so long as statements may be backed up by citations. Without citations, any statement could be made without any way to discern what is true and what is not. However, I have since researched Caithness and found your claim to be true, from what I could discern, so I added a statement back to the Caithness page, affirming the language as you suggested. I hope this helps. ButterCashier (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bias on Cabrilho...and new paper documented findings

edit

Hi Butter Cashier:

I noticed you just reversed my comments about a new paper that just came out about Cabrilho. Maybe you can do it better than I, i.e., summarize the documented new historical findings presented in that paper.

I also corrected other well know documented facts about Cabrilho, published in 2016 by Wendy Kramer, likevhis birth year. The current version of Wikipedia is outdated, quoting and older source from the great work of Harry Kelsey...but older than Kramer's new findings. Likewise there are not anymore "several locations" in Portugal claiming to be Cabrilho's birth place - that is also outdated, as shown by JS Tavares work.

I do not understand what you mean by different opinions, when a document that explicilty says "natural from", ends up understood as "born at". That is not what the primary historical sources/documents found by Kramer say at all. As mentioned in the paper I was trying to quote, Amerigo Vespucci royal naturalization letter says " you shall be considered natural of these kingdoms of mine, as if born here".

I think omitting such examples and others given in the new paper just keeps misinforming people. Francisco Pizarro himself used to say " I am natural and born in Trujillo", or the paradigmatic case of beatification of Santa Teresa de Avila, when Rome demanded a prove, in the XVI century, that she was indeed born in Avila, and was not just natural from Avila, etc, etc.

I kindly suggest you read the new preprint to see the new sources. I find it hard to believe that nuclear physics carbon-14 chronological data is biased...and you removed it...while at the same time keeping outdated and plain wrong information in the current version of the Wiki. History is made of primary sources, documented sources, not opinions. All I wrote summarizing that paper is detailed and duly justified/documented in that paper, that many consider the most important findings so far supporting Portuguese Cabrilho (and Alvar Nunes, a Portuguese pilot unknown so far) after Herrera's XVI century own work.

Anyway perhaps you are an historian, that can better judge the new Jan. 2023 paper, and decide what is biased or not, and distinguish plain wrong neutral info. from supposed bias.

Thanks for reading. 104.220.108.138 (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for editing! Sorry about reverting your entire edit on this page - the first edit I saw of yours was the most recent, in which I noticed the phrase "natural, is what the document says exactly...not born!", which I did not consider neutral since it appears to express a sense of surprise from the exclamation mark. Additionally, the phrase "(in a non solidly documented biased way)" seemed both grammatically incorrect as well as biased - I took a reference to the historians' views being biased as, itself, biased. Nevertheless, you wrote much information from one particular paper. I have reinserted lots of the information you added, rewriting it to appear a little less in the form of a paper, forming an argument, and more in the style of Wikipedia, giving out information. I cited the paper you referred to. It is likely that my reversion will only partially satisfy but I was attempting to remove biased phrasing and irrelevant information as much as I could while keeping the information you wrote. Perhaps more information ought to be appended as a result of your findings. Still, I have restored your version of the page, and note that my complete version of your edits was perhaps a mistake. Thanks for reading. ButterCashier (talk) 16:29, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

New paper on Cabrilho, Jan. 2023

edit

Hi Butter Cashier:

Thanks for your reply, and my apologies for my written English mistakes. Out of the 6 or 7 languages I speak, Russian or German surely have way more mistakes than my English. I still have to thank you though for correcting my Wiki editing grammar- appreciated.

I am not very familiar with the Wiki tools either - and thus this was the only way I found to answer you. Sorry if not being the most direct or effective one.

Thanks for editing back a significant part of what I was trying to communicate. This new paper has lots of juicy stuff indeed, and I hope the other parts are published soon, as the author says. Indeed, the new data in that paper are quite rich, and as others will read it, I trust further updating editing will come to the Wikipedia, as you stated.

From what I saw you removed Kelsey's book reference now, and this is one of the most extensive works on Cabrilho. Despite some outdated data and obvious hispanophile bias regarding Cabrilho's nationality, I think it is still a great work that deserves to be referred to in the Wikipedia.

Also I think it is important to keep the reference to Bartolome Ferrer closer to my original editing, since he is another example of a natural from Spain (some say, but no document exists showing explicitly so...) but not Spanish-born. Furthermore, after Cabrilho's death it was Ferrer who explored the USA coast up to nowadays Oregon. The finding of his 1547 testament alone is just remarkable.

Also I would humbly suggest some changes in Alvar Nunes' part, that you surely can do better than I, if you please. It was his ship (Santa Maria de Buena Esperança) that was likely rebaptized as Santa Maria de La Victoria, and I am not sure if that is totally clear in the text.

I do not want to take more of your time.

I do make yearly financial contributions to the Wikipedia, and do care a lot about accurate/correct information. It is not easy for you, surely, to distinguish biases all the time...plus one's own interpretation of what is biased and not ...may not always follow the laws of physics...

So I thank you for all the efforts you do in trying to keep things correct and balanced, while at the same time navigating the difficult sea of biases.

Look forward to see other people editions to Cabrilho's Wiki...things look exciting now.

All the very best. 104.220.108.138 (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The source you are basing that on is a preprint does not meet WP:RS. Even if it did satisfy reliable source criteria, there would also be an issue of WP:WEIGHT. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Happy to see you around once again!

❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 15:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Katie Flynn content

edit

I have updated the Katie Flynn page to the content on Penguin Random House. I also removed the old Web site which is no longer running and updated the new link. Can you please restore the update. Holly Flynn (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I've reverted your edit. Thanks for editing! ButterCashier (talk) 11:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

A cup of light coffee for you!

edit
  I like seeing you show up in notifications and in Recent Changes when I'm 0.2129453s late to reverting an edit. Enjoy this manually brewed coffee--that turned out lighter than usual--while you revert some more! ^-^ — DVRTed (Talk) 16:27, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I prefer tea actually but this is fine too. Happy editing! ButterCashier (talk) 10:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Pikmin 4 box art.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Pikmin 4 box art.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Removing redirect

edit

Why have you removed the redirect? The page is virtually useless as there is nothing on there. Mwiqdoh (talk) 09:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. It was a mistake, I think. Sorry and thanks for editing. ButterCashier (talk) 09:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Professor Layton and the New World of Steam logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Professor Layton and the New World of Steam logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Professor Layton and the New World of Steam logo.png

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Professor Layton and the New World of Steam logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your diligence in squashing vandals, and contributions to the efforts of RCP! Catalyzzt (talk) 12:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I appreciate it! Thanks for editing! ButterCashier (talk) 12:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the Super Mario Bros. Movie final trailer...

edit

Yoooo what's up? Well, I'm not here to warn you like many mean Wikipedia mods do. I just wanna tell you that you shouldn't add info about the Super Mario Bros. Movie's final trailer. Just wait for the trailer to be released and then you can add the info, ok? Remember: this isn't a warn, just an useful piece of advice that I learned from a really experienced Wikipedian. Nice day mah bro (or sis)!!! SupraMerioBros. (talk) 12:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Very well, perhaps it shouldn't be on there until after its broadcast. Thanks for editing! ButterCashier (talk) 12:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Professor Layton and The New World of Steam logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Professor Layton and The New World of Steam logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fearne Cotton/Ian Watkins edit

edit

Why did you remove my edit to the Fearne Cotton Wiki page? It was entirely accurate Wearethemissile (talk) 09:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for editing! The account you're using to write to me only has a single edit registered, being the one I'm replying to. The Fearne Cotton page has an edit I reverted earlier, which was because it didn't have a citation. ButterCashier (talk) 09:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
thank you, I will add one! Wearethemissile (talk) 09:40, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Help with recent changes

edit

Brookswood Secondary School

Would you have a look at recent edits here. It's got beyond me :). I would go back to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brookswood_Secondary_School&oldid=1144356138

Would you agree? Lukewarmbeer (talk) 09:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I restored that page. Some of the edits afterwards seemed good but some were not neutral or vandalism. I stopped using this website for a few minutes right before you wrote to me hence my delay. Thanks for editing! ButterCashier (talk) 10:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Doctor Who

edit
[[
File:Unofficial Whoniverse logo.jpg
Unofficial Whoniverse logo
|100px]]
For Services To The Whoniverse
Thank you for thanking my creation of the Doctor Who regeneration stories category. Foxx247 (talk) 20:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I love Doctor Who! ButterCashier (talk) 08:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

John Wick Chapter 4

edit

I ask you not to already add the plot to the movie's page here in Wikipedia. I understand you got excited with this movie but it hasn't released yet in many countries, like Portugal, where I live. Could you please remove the plot and only add it again after March 24? 2001:8A0:FF8A:B300:C43A:3CE6:D655:C5A6 (talk) 09:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for editing! I saw someone had removed the plot section on the John Wick: Chapter 4 page, without giving a reason, hence I reverted that edit. Since the film has been released, I don't see a good reason to not keep the plot section - that it hasn't been released in some countries doesn't seem like a good reason to not put it on. The film will never be released in certain countries; some people might not watch it for years, despite wanting to; people who have already seen it may desire a summary - hence, I think it should remain. Wikipedia isn't censored for spoilers, if you don't want to know the plot I suggest not reading the plot section. ButterCashier (talk) 09:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Dont you know any link where I can watch the full movie freely without any payments? That I can watch from my home in Portugal? 193.137.34.251 (talk) 09:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
My talk page is for discussing edits I've done on pages, primarily. This isn't the right place to ask for such things. Sorry. ButterCashier (talk) 10:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nazi symbolism

edit

Would you be kind enough to cast an eye over Context and adoption of the Swastika and give me a view on adding it to the article?

Many thanks Lukewarmbeer (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Sorry for not looking until now, but I have analysed your writing, rewritten some parts and included some suggestions in italics. Thanks for writing that anyway. ButterCashier (talk) 08:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for looking it over. Looked at your first message first and posted it as was. Will have a read of your suggestions and re edit. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reverted?

edit

Did I do something wrong on the WP:NOCONFED Talk Page? WaltClipper -(talk) 15:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for editing! You didn't, it was my mistake. I had the recent changes page open, where I detected your edit, but accidentally rolled it back instead of observing it. Apologies, I have restored your edit. ButterCashier (talk) 15:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, no worries, just making sure. Have a nice day~ --WaltClipper -(talk) 15:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

22 March 2023

edit

Hello, you may know me from one of the users who edited yahushua. I apologize for that behavior and i wont do it again i hope we can come on better terms and goodbye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:200:5519:89CD:EDD2:B89B:5236 (talk) 22:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply