Bigsteve2200

For me to use Wikipedia or edit would be to correct errors or add significant information that is relevant. This is only going to be done whenever it is necessary. The individual added was a prominent local figure that is relevant to the story and history of salisbury nc. This wasn’t done to advertise or add self. There is no reason to maintain a block as I don’t intend on misusing this platform or violating any policies . That was never an intention and not what I was trying to do

"Errors" like this and this? —Cryptic 15:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Would be correcting false information that is not factual to ensure that what is being posted and presented is truthful . That’s the type of errors that could be edited in the future.

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Willy's Wonderland have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Willy's Wonderland was changed by Bigsteve2200 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866378 on 2021-04-09T15:22:08 00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —Cryptic 15:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

This isn’t being used for that purpose. I will be appealing this Bigsteve2200 (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigsteve2200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

this page is not being used for promotion or advertising. Bigsteve2200 (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You inappropriately added someone named "Stephen Elliott Arthur" to an article about a North Carolina community(improperly, but let's set that aside for now). I assume that is yourself- though Steve is certainly not an uncommon name. See WP:AUTO. You won't be unblocked to further edit about this individual(whether you are them or not), so we will need to know what you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 15:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was blocked because of advertising or promotion. That is not why I operate this page and not what I was intending on doing. Please lift the block on my account. Thank you! Bigsteve2200 (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

You placed your request in the smaller section header window- all edits should be placed in the larger edit window. You can avoid creating section headers entirely by clicking "edit" and not "add topic". 331dot (talk) 15:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Any edits would be necessary edits made to correct information or add to a story. The individual that was added was not added as a conflict of interest or a self promotion. They are a significant local figure who is well known in the city. The editing was done in order to add to the history and information of this city. I understand the confusion . But I can assure you that any future edits will not violate any terms. That was not the intention of this edit either.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigsteve2200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

this page is not for advertising or promotion and that’s not what was intendedBigsteve2200 (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Well, it wasn't constructive. Yamla (talk) 18:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I apologize I am trying to figure out how to respond to your last request so I’m not trying to bombard your feed with multiple ones. The individual that was added to the salisbury page is a prominent local figure who is part of their history. The reason for the edit was to add missing context in order to inform readers of the correct history and information. I was not intending to violate any terms of service or promote or advertise. No future edits will violate the terms. Any edits will be done in correct context to anything to add to story or history of whatever the topic is to ensure that the reader is getting the correct information and not misinformation or missing context. Bigsteve2200 (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)