BerkBerk68

Besim Tibuk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Besim Tibuk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Please don't do this.

In particular, this [1]. The editor is not banned and you are not familiar enough with policy and procedure to be tagging another editor's page. Basically, your actions are disruptive, so please let others worry about tagging pages. Had I wanted the page modified, I would have done so when I blocked him. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

@Dennis Brown I am not sure (it might be at Turkish Wikipedia aswell) but, User:Visnelma was also doing the same. So I thought it's an okay thing, thanks for informing me. BerkBerk68^talk 23:59, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

I have no control over what someone does on other language 'pedias, but the main point is, he isn't banned. He is only blocked. The English wikipedia has very different rules about what is and isn't allowed, best to just walk on by or ask an admin if you aren't 100% sure about something like that. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

@Dennis Brown Okay, I got the situation. I will try to be more cautious and attentive. Thanks. BerkBerk68^talk 00:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Copy & Pasting

Just so you know, what you added to Turkic history[2] has been directly copied from the journal you cited on page 199. You can not copy information word-for-word, that is a violation of Wikipedia rules. You have to paraphrase it. Kansas Bear (talk) 01:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

done. BerkBerk68^talk 01:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

I won't stop contributing Wikipedia's development. My edits are not violated, you have reverted a consensus edit at the Pan-Turkism page without explaining your reasons at talk page. I highly recommend you to read WP:CON. BerkBerk68^talk 20:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Pretty ironic that you are telling me to read WP:CON when you are not even following it. Feel free to read it after you’ve finally read WP:POV. HistoryofIran (talk)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:43, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

checking that. BerkBerk68^talk 20:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

ANI Notice II

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. zenzyyx_ (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you a lot for the notice. BerkBerk68^talk 20:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hey, how are you? I have recently discovered that the history of the Mughal dynasty and the polity they ruled was within the scope of your interests. I invite you to have your say on the Persian influence section at the talk page where you have lately discussed the removal of your additions that dealt with the Chagatai origin of Mughals. Moreover, I do agree with your WP:JDL belief, and firmly think that this sort of attitude by particular users needs to come to an end as they harm Wikipedia's working environment. Thank you! Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 13:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello dear @Visioncurve, thank you for your interest on my opinion. Persian influence at the Mughal Empire is irrefutable and worth being represented at the article, as well as the Chagatai Turkic origins/influence. I believe that objective editors who want to contribute on the encyclopedia would support representation of both sides, therefore reflect civilizations as how they are.

Regards, BerkBerk⁶⁸ 14:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. zenzyyx (talk) 16:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

@Zenzyyx it never ends... Thanks, I guess xD BerkBerk⁶⁸ 16:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Kishtwari

Hello sir I'm here to talk about kishtwari , why you removed my claims? Everyone knows kishtwari is tonal and it's a language on its own 122.161.240.70 (talk) 05:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, some of your additions on the Kishtwari does not fit WP:NPOV, also your edit on the status is a significant change that should be well referred and/or discussed on the article's talk page. BerkBerk⁶⁸ 10:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Azerbaijani language

Historically the language was referred by its native speakers as Türki[6] meaning either "Turkish" or "Turkic". Prior to the establishment of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic, which adopted the name of "Azerbaijan" for political reasons in 1918, the name of "Azerbaijan" was exclusively used to identify the adjacent region of contemporary northwestern Iran.[7][8][9] After the establishment of the Azerbaijan SSR,[10] on the order of Soviet leader Stalin, the "name of the formal language" of the Azerbaijan SSR was changed from "Turkish" to "Azerbaijani".[10] Kergid (talk) 12:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Kergid, Azerbaijanis are already known by their Turkness, nobody is disagreeing with it. Currently the language itself is known by the name "Azerbaijani", so that's how we represent it at Wikipedia. It also can be referred as Azeri Turkish, but obviously not "Turkish" alone. Calling Azerbaijani language "Turkish" would mislead readers, they might think that it is the Turkic language spoken in Anatolia. BerkBerk⁶⁸ 12:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

We are discussing this issue with Louis Aragon on the page of the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan, it would be great if you join us. Kergid (talk) 12:41, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Contributing to the Qutb Shahi dynasty

You are invited to contribute to the page on a largely forgotten dynasty of the Qutb Shahis, the ruling family of the Golconda sultanate, an early-modern polity in southern India. Thanks. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 07:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I will try to contribute as much as I can. Thanks BerkBerk⁶⁸ 13:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

pending changes reviewer

Hello. As a result of the discussion at Special:Permalink/1109839641, your account has been added to the pending changes reviewers group, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Besim Tibuk has been accepted

Besim Tibuk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Styyx^Talk? 19:30, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

lezzz gooooo 🥳🥳🥳 BerkBerk⁶⁸ 14:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Are you interested in improving articles about Turkey which are not history?

Hello @BerkBerk68,

By chance I happened to notice that you and a few other editors are involved in some controversy re articles about Turkish history. I don't want to get involved with that but as you guys seem to be interested in improving the image of Turkey (or Türkiye of course) amongst English speakers I wonder if any of you are interested in helping me improve some articles about Turkey which are not controversial?

Maybe you noticed I have been going through some articles related to energy and climate change in Turkey trying to bring them up to "good" standard and I hope to continue. For example once I have done the ones I am working on now I hope later to improve Agriculture in Turkey - but as that likely won't be for a while I wonder if any of you might have time to expand that article a bit?

Saygılar

Chidgk1 (talk) 14:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Based on the ANI thread, and private evidence indicating you have canvassed for participation off-Wiki, including meatpuppetry, you are indefinitely blocked from editing. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)