Avoided

Please click here to leave a new message (and sign with --~~~~ at the end of your post!)

A barnstar

Donizo (talk) 08:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC) I would like to know how to get this barnstar and who gives it and to whom? Donizo (talk) 08:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Every user can award somebody of whom he thinks is doing good work with a WP:Barnstar. It's easy to do: go to preferences > Misc > User Pages, and you'll see an extra button called wp:wikilove:wikilove, which enables you to add an barnstar. p.s. would you just sign one time (at the end of your post) please? --Avoided (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please help my article to remove orphan tag - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ningombam_Bupenda_Meitei by Yobot .

Donizo (talk) 21:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Monte Bianco

Whilst you are correct about advising against copy and paste moves, the renaming itself would be disputed, so a housekeeping move would not be the course of action to repair the situation, so I reverted to the original redirect. A a copy and paste page in the history is of a minor concern. Best --Tikiwont (talk) 14:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

It was the IP 195.248.64.110 who intended such a ridiculous move. I wasn't sure if pure reverting would be enough, because the IP pasted the whole Mont Blanc page. I wanted to suggest hiding the revision from history, because I'm used to stricter regulations since I'm from the German Wikipedia. --Avoided (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

I sensed that much beyond the tag but since the move was reverted there is neither a need to remove the obstacle nor remains something to be attributed nor would i see a copy and paste from another wikipedia article as qualifying for revision deletion which we use here for copyright violations only. Thanks for spotting an the quick revert anyways.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your efforts against vandalism - you beat me thrice today! hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 15:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

Donizo (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Thank you Avoided . Help me out in removing this tag on the top of my article.Donizo (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC) Donizo (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC) still in google search, the two pages are still found,when will the admin remove from google search and keep the article onlyDonizo (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC) Donizo (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Hey, I found its deleted by Secret? I guess Secret is the admin.I gotten this finally - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Donizo/BupendaDonizo (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Donizo (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Please help in getting rid of

from my article as I have already cited two links 1 and 2 there just now.Donizo (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

1. Wikipedia admins have nothing to do with Goggle. It should disappear automatically after a short while, since the page doesn't exist no longer. 2. You can remove the tag by yourself if you think you have sourced it properly, anyway, I recommend to discuss it with the user who added the tag, who is User:CoJaBo. You can find all editors in the page history. --Avoided (talk) 15:31, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Donizo (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Thanks.If u cud remove the tag,it wud be good.I would like u to help me in improving my other articles which are forthcoming too.Donizo (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Donizo (talk) 08:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC) I have removed the tag of ref. by myself after waiting for a long time from Cojabo ,i sent a message to cojabo also but no reply.So, I followed your advice to remove it myself.Donizo (talk) 08:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Donizo (talk) 08:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC) I have sourced it properly.Donizo (talk) 08:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Mhmm. Okay. One thing: you bothered about two google hits of Bupenda. Maybe it's still there, because we have forgotten to delete the talk page (User talk:Donizo/Bupenda). I requested it to be deleted.--Avoided (talk) 08:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Donizo (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Thank you.Avoided . I want to know and help working in more articles and in editing too. Help me out. Why don't I get your message in my talk user page? I have to come and see here to know your reply. Why can't your reply here be messaged to me which used to be done earlier ?Donizo (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Donizo (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)I look forward to working with you. The tea stuff would be nice.Donizo (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Avoided , how are you ? I have caught up with one problem of orphan. In my article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ningombam_Bupenda_Meitei , where there was no problem for a long time, Yobot put orphan tag.

I want your help to remove it. I have already done in de-orphaning long back. Again, it has come. There are many links and references too. Plz help !!! Donizo (talk) 20:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your work on the anti-vandal beat today. Name Omitted (talk) 15:48, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Heh. You have now trumped me 5 times. I'd say you've got this covered for the time being. Name Omitted (talk) 15:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

William Faith article reverts

Hello Avoided

Please do not revert my edits to the William Faith article. The edits are all factual.

I'm an old friend of William Coulter (since 1990), therefore I have first hand knowledge of his past, including his family and date of birth.

So please stop the reverts.

Thanks

That all may be right. But such significant changes have to be based on published reliable sources. Everybody can tell he knows someone personally. --Avoided (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Evelin Ilves

Hi! I added a reference for my edits to Evelin Ilves. I hope there's no need to revert any more :) 90.191.170.96 (talk) 09:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

It's fine. Thanks --Avoided (talk) 09:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Dragonfly Productions

Re dragonfly productions

YOU seem to think highlighting fraudulent, possibly criminal activity is "not constructive"?

My edit of their page was entirely referenced with official government records - yet you took that down in support of what are clearly false and fraudulent claims made by Dragonfly Productions.

Interesting that Wikipedia supports convicted criminals (see Southall's own article about himself - he has a record) trying to deceive the public over those citing lawful public records!!! 78.150.16.128 (talk) 13:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

How do I complain to Wikipedia about it's 'moderators' removing FACTUAL information in favour of the fraudulent claims of Felons? 78.150.16.128 (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

there you have completely dewikified thew whole article (removing all categories, making it look like copy & past). --Avoided (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Ha! And that bothers you more than ACCURACY?

SHOCKING that you should replace VALID data with falsehoods on such a pretext!2.97.29.95 (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Nothing is lost - just check the Page History select your edit and try to make it look like an actual wikipedia article. I'm not really arguing much against you content. --Avoided (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I think you deserve one more for your efforts with Huggle. I often see you there, and you often beat me to reverting. Keep up the good work! :) Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad 16:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Thank you, sir! --Avoided (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

That Edit

It was a constructive piece. and it was taken down. I do not believe in this site anymore! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan9898 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

cool story, bro. --Avoided (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Here is a Halo-halo for you!

	Halo-Halo
	For reverting vandalism on the Japanese occupation of the Philippines I present to you this Filipino dessert dish. May it fuel you in your future anti-vandalism efforts. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Thomas Hardy

Hello, Just to let you know that I have changed the Hardy birth location to Higher Bockhampton. There is no such place as "Upper Bockhampton", or even "Upper Higher Bockhampton". I am a resident of Dorset and the area is marked on OS maps as per my change. Many thanks for reverting the vandalism. Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. And what do I have to do with it? --Avoided (talk) 05:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Spooky Nights

Just letting you know that I reverted your revert to even further back since you accidentally reverted the vandalized page to another vandalized version. Thats what happens with all this vandalism nowadays. Anyway, keep up the good work! Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 13:47, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Note: responded here. --Avoided (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Miracle on the Han

I am unsure as to why you rejected two hours of my editing on "Miracle on the Han" within seconds of me finalizing the changes. The article was clearly marked as resembling an opinion essay, and I moved sections for greater coherence, removed the purple prose, and corrected grammatical errors. If this is a matter of writing anonymously I can remedy this, but otherwise I would like a reason for this. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.201.192.112 (talk) 14:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Happened mistakenly. Never mind. Has been corrected. All your edits are in place. You are also allowed to restore your edits by yourself if someone reverted them. --Avoided (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks so much and best wishes from Korea.

sorry

sorry about the pie thing but I think that you should change the word unseeable to something else because it sounds a little weird — Preceding unsigned comment added by I eat fried chicken (talk • contribs) 15:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Nachricht

Hallo Avoided, vielen Dank für deine Glückwünsche. Viele Grüße --Jivee Blau (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Darnicht für. Du hast es verdient. Bitte stell doch mein Glückwunsch wieder ein. Es ist deine Disk und es ist ein Unding, dass man sich nun alles herausnehmen kann, weil ich mich gegen Unrecht gestellt hatte. Nach der selben Logik sollten auch Artikel oder Vandalismus reverts von mir gelöscht werden, sollte ich sie denn unter einem Proxy oder Sockenpuppenaccount tätigen. Als ob alles automatisch Böse ist, wenn's denn von einem Proxy oder Sockenpuppenaccount kommt. Verkehrte Logik einfach. Gruß, --Avoided (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Avoided. You have new messages at Smtchahal's talk page.
Message added 16:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

smtchahal^(talk) 16:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Avoided. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Avoided. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

i have a problem

hello you said my last edit was no good. How? I was simply doing the letter names and you said it doesn't help! Please tell me how

Send me a link to the article you are talking about. --Avoided (talk) 21:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Re: User:121.54.185.17

I found that this editor also removed sourced content, claiming it is not proven, only opinion.[1] Looking at the link, it seems more like it's their opinion that it's opinion, and not proven. What do you think? Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball! • Contribs} 03:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

I agree with you. The article in the Guardian clearly states that the Climate Council finds a clear link between bush fires and climate change. The findings of a science based organization can't be exactly regarded as a mere opinion, can they? However, perhaps it's something that should be discussed on the discussion page. I am not sure whether it can be said to be a fact or rather 'there are many hints that suggest that this is the case.' In this article on climatecentral.or it says Early signs suggest that these fires are in line with what to expect in a warming world, though there’s still work yet to be done to determine the exact connection., so maybe there is yet no consensus there and the IP is not completely wrong with criticizing the statement in the article. --Avoided (talk) 07:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, I'm RJG123. I wanted to let you know I think you made a mistake with your recent reversion of one of my edits: Richard II was a duplicitous and cowardly, not determined and courageous. Your reactionary, unreflective decision to instantly defend the status quo simply for something to do isn't constructive. Thanks. RJG123 --RJG123 (talk) 21:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

http://miami.cbslocal.com/video/3766825-joe-carollo-elected-as-city-commissioner/

i am writing factual information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miro530 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Why do you remove so much content from the article then? --Avoided (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

To do a Corinthian

The quote comes from Tom Holland's Persian Fire page 333 I typed in korinthiazein and got the page mentioned. As you know I'm not used to this I left a message ON SANDBOX, whatever that is. I'm assuming that "fuck" is the problem? If so I think its a bit silly, we are discussing history.

PS can you help with my question about conversations about Tibet?

I and user:Shellwood obviously failed to dinstinguish your edit from wp:vandalism. After a second glimpse, I don't see a problem with your edit; you can reenter your contribution. In 97 per cent of cases, edits including fuck are just simple vandalism. So we had a slightly unlucky case here. Concerning your question about conversations about Tibet: I think I'm not knowledgable enough. --Avoided (talk) 19:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

its a mistake

i am really sorry its really mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nandima godevithana (talk • contribs) 17:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	thank you for your work you keep beating me haha Jacktime34 (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Request for a global ban

We advise you of the request for a global ban against you. -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

DEINE KONTEN

—Preceding undated comment added 22:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Come at me, brah! --Avoided (talk) 23:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Avoided. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Avoided. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)