User talk:Alfa-ketosav/Archive1

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Dirubídium.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dirubídium.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop renaming articles without first getting consensus. You can do so using the process outlined at WP:RM. Some of the new titles you are creating are inconsistent with Wikipedia naming conventions.

Also, you should not change the titles of journal articles in references to fit your preferred name as you did with this edit. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:35, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

But we use benzenehexol trisoxalate, not hexahydroxybenzene trisoxalate. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 14:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

The reference in the article is titled "A new carbon oxide synthesis of hexahydroxybenzene tris oxalate" (well it did until you inappropriately altered the reference), so it could be argued that way as well. This is the reason that such changes to Wikipedia page titles should be discussed first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:43, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

The preferred name is benzene-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexol, not 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydroxybenzene. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 14:53, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Well obviously it's not preferred by at least one research group who has published on the topic. Wikipedia chemistry articles are not necessarily titled using any specific system of chemical nomenclature, such as IUPAC names. Guidelines are described at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (chemistry). This is why getting consensus is important before making a move. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

I agree with Edgar181, and hence I have reverted your moves and your alterations of reference titles. If you would like these articles to be renamed, please discuss it on the talk pages or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals and do it only if and after you get consensus for it. Double sharp (talk) 10:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Butalene

The butalene is indeed aromatic as shown by quantum chemical calculations. But both SMILES forms (c1ccc21cc2 and C=1C=C2C=CC=12) are equally correct and valid (the same as 2 SMILES's for benzene - c1ccccc1 and C=1C=CC=CC=1). I changed the form to non-aromatic because the Wikipedia Chemical Structure Explorer http://www.cheminfo.org/wikipedia/ is not able to process the aromatic form (what is apparently a bug in the SMILES parser of this tool). After your reversal I added now the non-aromatic form as an alternative SMILES, so also this molecules can be added to the database. SMILESmaster (talk) 13:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Dirubídium.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dirubídium.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 04:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)