AIienlong
Edit warring
editIt's really disappointing that you have chosen to ignore everything that was previously discussed here, and have decided to plough ahead and effectively repeat all your edits, before discussing them and reaching consensus. You need to do this first, before editing. See this guideline for a full explanation.
Editing in this manner is disruptive and known as edit warring. I urge you to approuch things in a sensible manner. Continued editing like this will only get you blocked from editing. Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- With all due respect I did not ignored your or other users requests, as you can see I have already done talk on the article "A" on the bottom of the list which is entitled as "Commagate" for all those who want to argue that change on 26 articles, as to the reason why I deleted talk on my page, is to urge users such as you to reach that issue directly on talk page of the article "A". Which I have previously discussed on my talk page that If anyone want to argue all 26 articles let them argue on talk page on article "A", again not tot repeat myself, and instead of thinking and disappointing in me It would've been much more productive from you and other users like you to ask me why I've done it or discus it on that talk page. AIienlong (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- AIienlong, I think you have good intentions but you're not taking in what other editors are telling you about how things work here. Opening the discussion was the right thing to do. Now you should wait for other editors to engage in that discussion and to reach a consensus on the question before making those edits. When you make an edit and another editor reverts you, discuss it and reach a consensus before restoring your edit. The method you're following is edit-warring and can get you blocked. Schazjmd (talk) 23:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have replied to the one that reverted me but unfortunately editor didn't reached me in span of 5 hours so I decided to revert his revert to gain users attention, as that happened user up to now didn't reached me on that issue so I'm still waiting for his answer to discuss it. As to the edit warring it states that An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. Which I didn't violated. AIienlong (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- You apparently didn't read on to where it says
The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so
Five hours? Everyone is a volunteer and has their own schedules. You should leave your discussion open at least a week; longer if people are still discussing. Schazjmd (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)- As you see no war started "fairly quickly" I still waiting for an answer and discussion on the talk page. AIienlong (talk) 00:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Since I am unable to communicate clearly enough for you to understand, I won't be commenting here again. Good luck with your endeavors. Schazjmd (talk) 00:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fair enough AIienlong (talk) 00:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Since I am unable to communicate clearly enough for you to understand, I won't be commenting here again. Good luck with your endeavors. Schazjmd (talk) 00:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- As you see no war started "fairly quickly" I still waiting for an answer and discussion on the talk page. AIienlong (talk) 00:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- You apparently didn't read on to where it says
- I have replied to the one that reverted me but unfortunately editor didn't reached me in span of 5 hours so I decided to revert his revert to gain users attention, as that happened user up to now didn't reached me on that issue so I'm still waiting for his answer to discuss it. As to the edit warring it states that An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. Which I didn't violated. AIienlong (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- AIienlong, I think you have good intentions but you're not taking in what other editors are telling you about how things work here. Opening the discussion was the right thing to do. Now you should wait for other editors to engage in that discussion and to reach a consensus on the question before making those edits. When you make an edit and another editor reverts you, discuss it and reach a consensus before restoring your edit. The method you're following is edit-warring and can get you blocked. Schazjmd (talk) 23:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
January 2025
edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Google, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 15:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC)