70.164.104.167

July 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 02:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Jolly1253. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Culture of Sussex have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jolly1253 (talk) 02:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

70.164.104.167 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Unblock me or else me mad so mad I was not supposed to be blocked

Me the boss of earth me extremely mad  70.164.104.167 (talk) 23:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:36, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Marks to Prove It. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marks to Prove It, you may be blocked from editing. Per Wikipedia Policy No legal threats: "Do not post legal threats on Wikipedia. A legal threat, in this context, is a threat to engage in an external (real life) legal or other governmental process that would target Wikipedia or other editors. It does not refer to any dispute-resolution process within Wikipedia." "Instead of posting a legal threat, you should try to resolve disputes using Wikipedia's dispute-resolution procedures. If your issue involves Wikipedia itself, you should contact the Wikimedia Foundation." Wikipedialuva (talk) 02:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC) {{Block indent|If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?

August 2022

Hello and welcome to wikipedia, this is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Marks to Prove It have been undone by a user called Mreatwashacked.

• Mreatwashacked makes very few mistakes but it does happen, If you believe the change you made was constructive, leave a message on my talk page, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse Or Help desk.

Thank You. Mr Eat (talk) 02:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Marks to Prove It, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bodø Energi. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:25, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —GFOLEY FOUR!— 02:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 02:29, 1 August 2022 (

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

70.164.104.167 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I hate Wikipedia do unblock me I guess u admins hate Me 70.164.104.167 (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining this useless request and extending the block due to legal threats that you made. 331dot (talk) 13:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

70.164.104.167 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry for all the legal threats and vandalism I have made I was mad at the world I now think that this block is no longer useful as I now want to make my first useful edit. I am sorry for all the chaos I caused and annoying the admins. I am very sorry for everything I caused I will try not taking out my anger on Wikipedia and I now plan on helping Wikipedia and making an account I believe that this block is no longer nessary as I want help out and actually learn how to edit. I am very sorry and know that this my consequence for my actions.70.164.104.167 (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Reading our guide to improving articles.
• Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

• 1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
     • and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
• Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 17:26, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

70.164.104.167 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am ready for my proposed edits to be reviewed and to be unblocked please tell me if there is more improvement needed I see that there was no mention of passkeys in IPadOS 16 article even though they should be added I have added a source from the apple developer website. I am ready to begin learning how to improve Wikipedia instead of disrupting it which is very easy but I am willing to learn how to be good 70.164.104.167 (talk) 00:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your edits are these. That's nowhere near a "significant and well researched improvement" but instead, a "small unreferenced addition". As you are unable or unwilling to follow the instructions, I am declining your unblock request. I think it best if you sit out your one month block, it will give you time to learn how Wikipedia works. Yamla (talk) 09:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's also possible this edit wasn't actually copying content from iPadOS 16, in which case that demonstrates you are unable to follow directions. --Yamla (talk) 09:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Features

See also: iOS 16 § Features

Weather

A version of the Weather app was added.

Lock screen

The Lock Screen has a new font and displays the date above the time to match iOS 16, but lacks the new customization features.

Stage Manager

On iPads with an M1 chip, Stage Manager allows up to 4 apps to be displayed in adjustable windows, and allows the user to switch between different stages with different sets of apps.

External displays

iPads with an M1 chip now have full external display support using Stage Manager, instead of screen mirroring.

Display Zoom

iPads with M1 now have the ability to change text size to fit more on screen.

Passkeys

iPads will now be able to authenticate to websites with a passkey allowing the user to sign without a password by using FaceID or TouchID.

<ref>https://developer.apple.com/passkeys/<ref> 70.164.104.167 (talk) 00:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

---