67.171.195.24

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2012 in science, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vertium ^{When all is said} _{and done} 16:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onshore Flow (Meteorology).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 16:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. CZmarlin (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Emotion ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Sikorsky S-76. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

67.171.195.24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not know whether if I should stop or continue editing the page called "pressure washer" after the last block. I thought that I could continue editing that after that block. I know now that my actions about edit warring can get me blocked. I'll make sure I will never edit that page again. 67.171.195.24 (talk) 03:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm not sure that you really understand the reason why you were blocked. You are free to edit articles when not blocked or otherwise restricted, however when editors are repeatedly undoing your edits you do need to stop making those edits and discuss the matter with those editors. Once you've come to a consensus on how to proceed, then you can continue editing that article. I'd also recommend that you review our guidelines on how internal links to other articles should be used: Wikipedia:LINK#Overlinking_and_underlinking. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 14:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2012

Hello, I'm Waggers. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to 1982 in science, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WaggersTALK 20:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cooling tower, you may be blocked from editing. Old Moonraker (talk) 22:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at SIO with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 01:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 67.171.195.24. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 16:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

78.26 (talk) 16:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Everybody Wants You

Hi. Please don't add song lyrics to articles; this is a copyright violation. Thanks, 28bytes (talk) 04:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Murphy's law. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. SpinningSpark 20:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

67.171.195.24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not know I was editing warring on "Murphy's Law". I had to revert some edits on that page because the last revisions gave good information. Also, those persons didn't explain their reason for deleting that part of the section. 67.171.195.24 (talk) 01:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"I did not know I was editing warring on 'Murphy's Law'." Twice within the preceding month you've been blocked for edit warring; you no longer have this excuse. You know what it is. "Also, those persons didn't explain their reason for deleting that part of the section." See WP:NOTTHEM. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your addition to Nightmare has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase http://www.dreams.ca/nightmares.htm, a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases which are not attributed to their source may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not upload it. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 18:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onshore Flow (Meteorology).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! T.I.M^(Contact) 23:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onshore Flow (Meteorology) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onshore Flow (Meteorology), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onshore Flow (Meteorology) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onshore Flow (Meteorology), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onshore Flow (Meteorology)

Hello 67.171.195.24. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Onshore Flow (Meteorology)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onshore Flow (Meteorology)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

---