This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks. |
---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
September 2008editWelcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Awesome worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Miquonranger03 (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2008 (UTC) October 2008editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thermal insulation, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Golf has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC) The recent edit you made to Southeastern United States constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ncmvocalist (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC) November 2008editWelcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Southern United States has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. MatthewYeager 19:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sack of Rome (410) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Eric-Wester (talk) 15:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC) The recent edit you made to Sack of Rome (410) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Oliver202 (talk) 15:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sack of Rome (410). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Oliver202 (talk) 15:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC) This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Council of Chalcedon. Oliver202 (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) March 2009editWelcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Charles Lindbergh has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 15:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC) April 2009editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Knights of Columbus. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 14:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Brianga (talk) 14:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
September 2010editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Unitarianism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC) October 2010editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Presbyterianism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Alpha Quadrant (alt) talk 17:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Unitarianism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- Alpha Quadrant (alt) talk 18:00, 1 October 2010 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Presbyterianism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Presbyterianism. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Abu Torsam 17:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Presbyterianism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Minimac (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
March 2011editWelcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hydrus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bped1985 (talk) 14:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
April 2012editPlease refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
May 2014editHello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Chinese zodiac, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC) May 2016editHello, I'm Peter SamFan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Hancock has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peter Sam Fan 14:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC) September 2017edit
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. – Gilliam (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
|
January 2018
editHello, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paper sons have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 19:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese Exclusion Act. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chinese Exclusion Act was changed by 24.154.55.189 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913074 on 2018-01-23T19:31:05 00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chinese Exclusion Act, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 19:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese Exclusion Act. Simplexity22 (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
March 2018
editHello, I'm Pablomartinez. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Upton Sinclair— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PabloMartinez (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Upton Sinclair. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:11, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William M. Tweed, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. – Gilliam (talk) 04:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Comments: Blocked for 2 years.This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |