Wikipedia

Zodon

Joined 12 February 2008

This is a wikipedia user page. There is nothing here of general interest, it is just a scratch pad of my notes, accumulating references, space for my testing, drafts, etc. for working on other pages.

PS238

Notes

edit

Markup

edit

{{reflist|colwidth=30em}} Multiple column references based on browser settings (more compatible than specifying number of columns.

{{refbegin|colwidth=30em}} ... {{refend}} For references just listed (rather than footnoted). Can also use colbegin/end.

{{main | main article on this topic }}

{{anchor | target name for section link}}

{{redirect| redirected page | message |page on similar topic}}

{{as of|year|...}} Likely to become dated quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked/ URL for finding changes to pages linked to by a wiki page

{{WikiProject Computing}}

Useful documents

edit

Useful templates:

Help:Merging and moving pages

Perhaps merged-to should include link to current talk? Think this code might do it: for its talk page, see [[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{{1}}}|here]]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam

Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force

WP:BRD

Help:Parser function

Tools

edit

Popularity

edit

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Pageview bot - API for stats.

Citations

edit

Template expansion

edit

Special:ExpandTemplates - Expands templates so you can see what they will do without having to generate test cases.

Misc

edit

Encyclopedic style

Todo

edit
  • cohabitation - edits need cleanup [1]

{{too many categories}} - needs a hidden category for its pages.

{{Human group differences}} - Awful mishmash of topics (making NPOV statements about things like race, which is not a human group difference) deletion is probably best course, or move to more specific particular field.

Suggest pronto Suggest that User:MiszaBot I add some error checking for moved pages. For instance when somebody moved Vaccine controversy, but forgot to move the archives. The bot could note at least simple cases when the archive link would not work, and put a warning on the page.

Bot ideas:

  • Is there a bot or tool to find overcategorized articles. This version of Eugen Relgis was quite impressive in excessive categorization involved.
    • Probably not as much of an issue - but might be interesting to look for overprojected articles too, again same article had 10 or more wikiprojects listed.
  • Bot to remove redundant categorization - something in a category and an immediate subcategory of that category. (Should only be in immediate subcategory).


Looking at articles on History of sexuality - looks like may be enough articles to warrant a separate template just on history of sexuality (or by region). (Prostitution, sexuality, etc.) Might help make those articles easier to navigate, and reduce size of template sex.


The Energy Detective article was deleted - merge content from it (User:Zodon/The Energy Detective) into Home energy monitor. If merge anything in, let user:courcelles know, so they can make the records right (for copyright) [2].

Intelligence - collection of articles on demographics of intelligence, need clearer organization/linking. Also, look at template that links human group differences.

Pharmaceutical fraud - merge drug fraud. Heath care fraud - move to health insurance fraud (dupe quackery).

Zodon

ICD10 for Contraceptive managment is: Z30


Need a navigation template (or something) for all the material on computer recycling/electroncis recycling/etc. (Mass o articles, hard to know what exists). Some article moves might make sense.

Also - should mention hacking/repurposing in computer recycling/reuse.

In general the hacking/hackspace articles lack links to history and to professionals doing the same thing. Need links to university/professional research labs (like PARK, Media Lab, Menlo park, wright brothers, etc.) Also to similar in different areas (amateur science, amature engineering, workshops, learned societies, etc. Right now computers, robotics, etc. are fashionable - 100 years ago internal combustion engine, electricity and flight were popular hobbyiest areas - with the chemical revolution, chemistry - the industrial, steam/machines/engines/pumps. There is considerable history, probably running back to "renaisance" men, guilds, Leonardo, archimedes, etc.).

Amateur scientist/Amateur science could use an article, Similar/subgroup (subsume?) Citizen science

Merges proposed beginning September (04)


Consider - Standy Power - anything worth resurrecting? [3]


Respond Talk:Reproductive_health#Name_change_to_Sexual_and_Reproductive_Health [4]


Steiner & Cates reference in safe sex - add

which cites:

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (2001-07-20). Workshop Summary: Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention (PDF). Hyatt Dulles Airport, Herndon, Virginia. pp. 13–15. Retrieved 2009-03-20. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
Warner L, Stone KM, Macaluso M, Buehler JW, Austin HD (2006). "Condom use and risk of gonorrhea and chlamydia: a systematic review of design and measurement factors assessed in epidemiologic studies". Sex Transm Dis. 33 (1): 36–51. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000187908.42622.fd. PMID 16385221.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Wald, A.; Langenberg, A. G.; Krantz, E.; Douglas Jr, J. M.; Handsfield, H. H.; Dicarlo, R. P.; Adimora, A. A.; Izu, A. E.; Morrow, R. A.; Corey, L. (2005). "The Relationship between Condom Use and Herpes Simplex Virus Acquisition". Annals of Internal Medicine. 143 (10): 707–713. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-10-200511150-00007. PMID 16287791. Retrieved 2007-04-07.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
Winer RL, Hughes JP, Feng Q; et al. (2006). "Condom use and the risk of genital human papillomavirus infection in young women". N. Engl. J. Med. 354 (25): 2645–54. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa053284. PMID 16790697. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)


Expand

edit

Misc

edit
    • Sex workers articles are a bit hard to navigate - might be template warranted (Sex worker, rights, Prostitute, etc.)
  • Bot idea - check navbox template name fields to make sure that the name matches the template name (e.g. same, or Zodon). (Allow override for special cases where doing fancy things with subtemplates?)

http://www.arhp.org/Publications-and-Resources/Clinical-Fact-Sheets/Menstrual-Suppression

Reference that covered ethnographic studies - menstruate a lot more than before BC


Merge - mess of stubs about information security policy/etc.

etc.

  • Merge Vaccine critic, List of vaccine topics
  • {{Google trends}} - search template for google trends, done basic, could add parameters for place, time

A1

edit

Talk:List of filming locations in Metro Vancouver - third opinion (seems both summaries are in).

  • Life expectancy ‎ - refs/respond discussion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests

  • Examp disease template - discussion.

Orphanage http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KP_Botany&diff=271081355&oldid=271080476


http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Proembryo&curid=10060927&action=history


  • Cervix EL.

BC & abortion http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Birth_control&diff=269278582&oldid=269003430 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Birth_control&diff=269130573&oldid=268930864

Sections - problems, don't fit under overall section, either split into definition, prevalence (include other methods), method Or remove subsections (don't think should expand coverage much - weight).

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PRI&diff=269268495&oldid=268134421

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cervical_cap&diff=269023185&oldid=268597694

Book - needs cover efficiency http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/How_To_Assemble_A_Desktop_PC/Silencing#Other

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classes_of_computers&diff=269378406&oldid=264016019


http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solid-state_drive&diff=268522583&oldid=268414725

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reproductive_health&diff=268503174&oldid=261814166

IVF history - from article found/ref in beginning of Pg controversy


Cocop & depression http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Combined_oral_contraceptive_pill&diff=267288786&oldid=267152642

Overpop http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Overpopulation&diff=267267418&oldid=267097604

STD http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sexually_transmitted_disease&diff=266825059&oldid=266610080


Infertility needs some cleanup, including redundancy here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infertility&diff=264567491&oldid=261016349

Consider http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bali_ultimate&diff=260507272&oldid=260507135

Pap test - proportion of types of reports might be helpful (need source) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pap_test&diff=260373426&oldid=258747262#Results

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Approximation_error&curid=640422&diff=258622106&oldid=257673608

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Nations_Population_Fund&diff=257276933&oldid=252322169

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Childfree&diff=257316361&oldid=257241193

Check abstinence &c additions - ?source, ?better someplace else?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sex_education&diff=256677876&oldid=256380440 Sex education - back and forth

Check refs - not sure about quality (more precise wording) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anal_Pap_smear&diff=256656846&oldid=256378664

Check out ref - update contents appropriately http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Energy_Detective&curid=7421016&diff=256730225&oldid=256729687

Privacy

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Privacy&diff=255763703&oldid=254157476

Breeding in the wild - looks peculiar, see how develops (suspect duplicate with something).

Health disparities

edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Health_and_Social_Class&diff=254610349&oldid=254366382

Other

edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexually_transmitted_disease&curid=19019270&diff=251515817&oldid=251477629#Prevention

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Nations_Population_Fund&diff=245546523&oldid=243123345

Respond

drsvard

subject order in BC articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Reproductive_medicine_task_force#Section_order_and_naming_in_contraception_articles

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dynamic_voltage_scaling&diff=prev&oldid=226076393

Repro rights - dealt with parts, but the early removals still questionable http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reproductive_rights&diff=prev&oldid=227997164

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Green_computing&curid=1661475&diff=228628757&oldid=228614524

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beginning_of_pregnancy_controversy&curid=5506519&diff=230692075&oldid=230559672

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=One-child_policy&diff=prev&oldid=232831517

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccination_and_religion&curid=4028818&diff=233252176&oldid=233252025#References

Reproductive physiology - goes to Repro endocrinology and infertility (seems pretty strange, not sure where it should go).

Sep sexual practices from LGBT in sex ed. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sex_education&diff=prev&oldid=222152160

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Population_control&diff=prev&oldid=227231240

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Population_control&curid=72156&diff=231194707&oldid=230358703#United_States

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Population_control&curid=72156&diff=245614040&oldid=245337009 List of population policy orgs, not specifically pop control

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Population_control&diff=231194707&oldid=230358703

Proposed merger Men's health into Andrology.

Should merge The Energy Detective, Cent-a-meter and take the chunk out of Misc electric loads & energy conservation to make an item on end user display electric meters.

Electricity meter - combine Time of use with variable rate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gardasil&diff=235661513&oldid=235083609

Bunch of edits here - some of them messed up facts/language/etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_papillomavirus&diff=238706475&oldid=238689444

Merge of sustainable urban ... - could tidy up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USB_flash_drive&diff=234866743&oldid=234513834

Need work (or merging away): Enterprise flash drive Secure USB drive

?? questionable http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calendar-based_methods&curid=26485&diff=240635060&oldid=240031897


  • COCP - why oral pill?

Template:Public health - prevent - would Physical exercise be good addition (or maybe activity, if can find). Something on stress managment also?

Maybe hygiene template - with more particulars


Template talk:computer sizes

As far as workstation versus personal computer - workstations are generally personal (devoted to one person). But swapping the two might make sense. I wouldn't read too much into the details of ordering here. In an average sense it goes by size, but the field changes so much that one generation's supercomputer is another generations laptop. Since the purpose of the template is navigation, it isn't clear that it has to represent all the variants possible. Zodon (talk) 09:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


Adolescent sexuality in US

edit

This edit made the phrasing wrong: I fixed it temporarily, but find some sources so can put the general explanation back. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adolescent_sexuality_in_the_United_States&diff=236920274&oldid=236881885

Check that it didn't change contraceptive use, fix arrangement (again). http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adolescent_sexuality_in_the_United_States&curid=9064442&diff=237334291&oldid=237317456 (More closely link contraceptive use to STD/pregnancy prevention).

[5]

also look at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adolescent_sexuality_in_the_United_States&diff=254787773&oldid=254279841


Population research institute

edit

Research in population and demographics.

Population research institute - Page for PRI, move current page (needs new name - ... (virginia)? Add disambig page.

http://www.vaestoliitto.fi/in_english/population_research/ http://nubs.nju.cn/en/aboutus.php/j14

The Population Research Institute (PRI) encourages, organizes, and supports innovative research and training in the population sciences.

Pennsylvania State University Center for Population Research


Cat Research institutes in the United States Demography Population


Ab US

edit

etc. pro-life

Drafts

edit

Misc

edit
  • Idea - Templates should have a subst/nosubst attribute that can be set by the template editors and that software automatically checks when posting edit. (i.e. warns when a template should be substd, or when it should not).
  • Idea - Walled garden finder. Specifically, find articles that have links to them, but that are not reachable from the homepage/start page/whatever you call it.
  • Idea - Template orphan finder. Find templates that are not transcluded. Needs some care. Navboxes that are not transcluded in any article. WikiProject templates that don't occur on talk pages. Templates that occur on no (or few) transclusions.
  • Idea - navbox checker. Check that navbox templates occur on the pages that they link to. (Provide report of pages that link to but don't include, offer assistance to add in selected cases.)

Navigation template - Navbox/Sidebar

edit

This is a test of making one template that can be used as a navbox or as a sidebar. Example based on {{discrimination}} template and {{discrimination sidebar}}:

user:zodon/sandbox - content template, takes argument boxtype to define formatting (based on {{discrimination}}).

  • boxtype = navbox, "navbox with collapsible groups", user:zodon/sandbox3

Since {{sidebar}} uses different arguments than {{navbox}}, I created a family of templates based on sidebar, but modified so most arguments named the same as navbox.

Other changes made to these versions, vs. sidebar.

  • Added child/border options - sidebar didn't have them, but needed for subgroup/etc.
  • sidebar with collapsible groups seems to list group names twice (removed duplicate listing)

Should the templates to do this be sidbar, etc., or should they be variants of navbox (i.e. "navbox sidebar", "navbox sidebar subgroups", "navbox sidebar with collapsible groups")?

Example: Sidebar version.

Risks and contraindications

edit

Oral contraceptives may influence coagulation, increasing the risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, stroke and myocardial infarction (heart attack). The Stroke Journal said that OCs confer "risk of first ischemic stroke."[1] The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism also concluded in 2005 that "a rigorous meta-analysis of the literature suggests that current use of low-dose OCs significantly increases the risk of both cardiac and vascular arterial events."[2]

Combined oral contraceptives are generally accepted to be contraindicated in women with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, in women who have a familial tendency to form blood clots (such as familial factor V Leiden), women with severe obesity and/or hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol level), and in smokers over age 35.

Recent scientific research has shown that there is evidence that these pills are carcinogenic,[3] at the same time they decrease the risk of ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer,[4] and colorectal cancer.[5] They confer a risk of first schemic stroke,[1] and significantly increase the risk of cardio-vascular disease.[2] These pills also lead to increased deep vein thrombosis.

The risk of thromboembolism varies with different preparations; With second-generation pills (with an estrogen content less than 50μg), the risk of thromboembolism is small with an incidence of approximately 15 per 100,000 users per year, compared with 5 per 100,000 users per year among non-pregnant individuals not taking the pill, and 60 per 100,000 pregnancies.[6] In individuals using preparations containing third-generation progestogens (desogestrel or gestodene), the incidence of thromboembolism is approximately 25 per 100,000 users per year.[6] Also, the risk is greatest in subgroups with additional factors, such as smoking (which increases risk substantially) and long-continued use of the pill, especially in women over 35 years of age.[6]

Monograph 91 of The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) stated in 2005 that "there is sufficient evidence in humans for the carcinogecity of combined estrogen-progestogen contraceptives."[3][7] Research into the relationship between breast cancer risk and hormonal contraception is complex and seemingly contradictory.[8] The large 1996 collaborative reanalysis of individual data on over 150,000 women in 54 studies of breast cancer found that: "The results provide strong evidence for two main conclusions. First, while women are taking combined oral contraceptives and in the 10 years after stopping there is a small increase in the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed. Second, there is no significant excess risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after stopping use. The cancers diagnosed in women who had used combined oral contraceptives were less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in women who had never used these contraceptives."[9] This data has been interpreted to suggest that oral contraceptives have little or no biological effect on breast cancer development, but that women who seek gynecologic care to obtain contraceptives have more early breast cancers detected through screening.[10][11] While taking the pill, there are approximately 0.5 excess cancers per 10,000 women aged 16–19, and approximately 5 excess cancers per 10000 women aged 25–29.[6]

Crooks and Baur said that the health risks of oral contraceptives are lower than those from pregnancy and birth,[12] and "the health benefits of any method of contraception are far greater than any risks from the method".[13] Some organizations have argued that comparing a contraceptive method to no method (pregnancy) is not relevant—instead, the comparison of safety should be among available methods of contraception.[14]

Can add with collapsible groups to make sidebar collapsed (but needs some tweaking).

  • Basic concept seems to work - just needs ironing out details

Problems:

  • The sidebar templates use different arguments from the navbox set (and sidebar collapsible uses yet another set of arguments).
    • created set of templates with names mirroring navbox names (and parameters fixed to match navbox) for trial puposes.
  • How to handle different formatting in each type
    • Line breaks - think adding a linebreak parameter would do it (define as <br /> to make it break)
    • Handeling collapsing of subsections - in the example the the shared document codes which items are collapsible - may be a bit ugly. Might be better to have a general collapsible parameter (i.e. groupNcollapsible, or collapsible = list of sections to make collapsible. Another exercise would be to handle making collapsible, but starting out uncollapsed).

Footer version:

Risks and contraindications

edit

Oral contraceptives may influence coagulation, increasing the risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, stroke and myocardial infarction (heart attack). The Stroke Journal said that OCs confer "risk of first ischemic stroke."[1] The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism also concluded in 2005 that "a rigorous meta-analysis of the literature suggests that current use of low-dose OCs significantly increases the risk of both cardiac and vascular arterial events."[2]

Combined oral contraceptives are generally accepted to be contraindicated in women with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, in women who have a familial tendency to form blood clots (such as familial factor V Leiden), women with severe obesity and/or hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol level), and in smokers over age 35.

Recent scientific research has shown that there is evidence that these pills are carcinogenic,[3] at the same time they decrease the risk of ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer,[4] and colorectal cancer.[5] They confer a risk of first schemic stroke,[1] and significantly increase the risk of cardio-vascular disease.[2] These pills also lead to increased deep vein thrombosis.

The risk of thromboembolism varies with different preparations; With second-generation pills (with an estrogen content less than 50μg), the risk of thromboembolism is small with an incidence of approximately 15 per 100,000 users per year, compared with 5 per 100,000 users per year among non-pregnant individuals not taking the pill, and 60 per 100,000 pregnancies.[6] In individuals using preparations containing third-generation progestogens (desogestrel or gestodene), the incidence of thromboembolism is approximately 25 per 100,000 users per year.[6] Also, the risk is greatest in subgroups with additional factors, such as smoking (which increases risk substantially) and long-continued use of the pill, especially in women over 35 years of age.[6]

Monograph 91 of The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) stated in 2005 that "there is sufficient evidence in humans for the carcinogecity of combined estrogen-progestogen contraceptives."[3][7] Research into the relationship between breast cancer risk and hormonal contraception is complex and seemingly contradictory.[15] The large 1996 collaborative reanalysis of individual data on over 150,000 women in 54 studies of breast cancer found that: "The results provide strong evidence for two main conclusions. First, while women are taking combined oral contraceptives and in the 10 years after stopping there is a small increase in the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed. Second, there is no significant excess risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after stopping use. The cancers diagnosed in women who had used combined oral contraceptives were less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in women who had never used these contraceptives."[9] This data has been interpreted to suggest that oral contraceptives have little or no biological effect on breast cancer development, but that women who seek gynecologic care to obtain contraceptives have more early breast cancers detected through screening.[10][16] While taking the pill, there are approximately 0.5 excess cancers per 10,000 women aged 16–19, and approximately 5 excess cancers per 10000 women aged 25–29.[6]

Crooks and Baur said that the health risks of oral contraceptives are lower than those from pregnancy and birth,[17] and "the health benefits of any method of contraception are far greater than any risks from the method".[18] Some organizations have argued that comparing a contraceptive method to no method (pregnancy) is not relevant—instead, the comparison of safety should be among available methods of contraception.[19]

Other testing:

Testing
t
blah blah blah

Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah

This is a test
General forms
Other forms
Related topics

Testing the reformatable navbox - boxstyle - navbox or navbox sidebar. Formatting parameters - figure out what they should be to allow setting breaks, setting styles in sub-boxes (e.g. change sub-group/list styles, depending on the boxstyle using).

Pap

edit

Maybe for HPV article on prevalence. But only seen article abstract. Not sure how good those numbers are.

Worldwide an estimated 290 million women show evidence of HPV DNA from one or more high risk types; approximately a third of those have been infected with HPV types 16 and/or 18.[20]



Pap Template

edit

Template:Human papillomavirus


Focal epithelial hyperplasia

Cytotechnology

Dysplasia

Other Pap

edit

HPV Vaccine - merge in material from Gardasil article (when don't want to do a lot of thinkin).


Prevalence - STD article should cover other STIs in prevalence (HIV, HPV, etc.)

Worldwide prevalence: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16168781

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17597569?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed "On the basis of these estimates, around 291 million women worldwide are carriers of HPV DNA, of whom 32% are infected with HPV16 or HPV18, or both."

  • That only gives HPV positive status, a lot more have been infected.


HPV testing of questionable value for primary screening for cervical cancer.

  • Observers vary widely in assessment of the utility of HPV testing as a method of detecting cervical cancer.
    • Very large number of false positive tests in sexually active young women.
  • Of doubtful value in replacing the Pap smear.

Koss, Leopold (2006). Koss' Diagnostic Cytology and its Histopathologic Bases (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 297. ISBN 0781719283, 9780781719285. OCLC 57731380. observers [...] vary widely in assessment of the utility of the [HPV] test as a method of cancer detection. The most important argument against this application of HPV testing is the very large number of false positive tests in sexually active young women (Clavel et al, 1999; Bishop et al. 2000; Davey and Armenri, 2000; Koss, 2000; Cuzick, 2000). {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Canada is cost effectiveness. (Should go under future impact, as should the part of safety and effectiveness about commentary by researcher.)

Look at HPV vaccine sections also (consider how to combine this stuff).

Screening

edit

Virus

edit

Should be an infobox for ICTV virus codes - link to ICTVdB or data. (or as fields in taxobox)

Help:Infobox

[6]

Viruses - category needs subcats for classes/etc. Category:Viruses also maybe categorization links


ICTVdB etc

edit

/sandbox


No arguments - display link to the database.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ICTVdb/ICTVdB/ Another URL

Examples of how ICTVdB entries used - so can see what would make useful template.

{{ICTVdB}} {{ICTVdB|code=00.046| family=Orthomyxoviridae}} {{ICTVdB|code=00.046.0.03.002| name=Dhori virus.}} {{ICTVdB|code=00.046.0.03.002| name=Dhori virus. | format=cite}} {{ICTVdB|code=00.046.0.03.002| name=Dhori virus. |inline}}

  • Code = 00.046
  • Name =
  • Form = cite | inline | plain | short | bare | url
  • Version = 4
  • --> (2006)


  • Family = Orthomyxoviridae May not need this if can get away with using same format as for regular on family.

00.046.0.03.002. Dhori virus.

ICTVdBcite|00.034.0.01.001|Raspberry bushy dwarf virus

Official citation: (links added)

ICTVdB Management (2006). _00.046.0.03.002. Dhori virus._ In: ICTVdB - The Universal Virus Database, version 4. Büchen-Osmond, C. (Ed), Columbia University, New York, USA

For families, cite as: (May not need to treat them differently - seem to see some places listed as below, but others listed same as above)

Index of Viruses - Orthomyxoviridae (2006). In: ICTVdB - The Universal Virus Database, version 4. Büchen-Osmond, C (Ed), Columbia University, New York, USA. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ICTVdb/Ictv/fs_index.htm

External link

ICTVdBlink|

Way to generate something on the lines of: ICTVdB - The Universal Virus Database: Raspberry bushy dwarf virus http://phene.cpmc.columbia.edu/ICTVdB/00.034.0.01.001.htm

ICTVdB - The Universal Virus Database: Tobacco streak virus

ICTVdB - The Universal Virus Database: virus name URL

To do - if leave second parameter empty, just display the code with link.


ICTVdBcode|00.034.0.01.001


Should it have a field in cite web?

NCBI Taxonomy EL

edit

Create NCBI Taxonomy EL template. NCBI Taxonomy ID: 12059. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=12059

{{Taxonomy ID|12080}}

NCBI TAXID

(Covers more than just viruses.)

Vaccines

edit

Vaccine controversy - Financial - include financial interest of critics. (Malpractice industry.) Vaccines not highly profitable (influenza vaccine hard to manufacture - few makers, articles on subject from few years ago.) (Compare to viagra, supplements.)

Askarisk for asthma - insufficient antigens theory. More vaccines now, but less antigenic material than in earlier vaccines.

Separate religion and alternative medicine from arguments against - they are not arguments against per se.

Give more ballanced view (not all religions oppose), not all alternative medicine opposes. (Highly compatible with some alternative med theories.)

Vaccine interference - short article, (1 paragraph) seems like could be rolled into major article like vaccination.

Vaccine critic - Basically a list of people, should probably merge into list of vaccine topics.



Privacy

edit
  • Privacy
  • DOI
  • DOIbot
  • Information privacy - section should be move to
    • information privacy law
  • Surveillance and Mass Surveillance - missing coverage of transaction records

(Utility, phone, groceries, etc.)

Created template:privacy

Sustainability measurement

edit

Sustainability Measurement

Environmental impact assessment

environmental audits



Green computing

edit

Needs navigation template:

Green computing


Policy



Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool

Groups


Camara (charity) Organizations:

  • Books
    • Challenging the Chip, a book about labor rights and environmental justice in the global electronics industry

Digger gold

Energy monitor

edit

Home energy monitor

EUM -2000 Whole House Energy Monitor – www.energymonitor.com Blue Line Innovations – www.bluelineinnovations.com Consumer Powerline – www.consumerpowerline.com/homejoule Aztech Power Systems - www.aztechmeter.com


Clip on energy monitor, Install by electrician, Plug in energy monitor

Homebrew Read electricity meter (optical, etc.)

edit

Whole bunch of articles on energy monitoring, etc. Big tangle that should be organized (maybe some articles combined).

Building automation Home automation ‎


Electricity meter

Home energy monitor Wattmeter Smart meter Kill A Watt Cent-a-meter

Google PowerMeter


Energy management - disambig page, see linked to IT energy management Power management PC power management

Energy audit

Efficient energy use


IT - bunch of pages that relate (DCIE, PUE, etc.)


Low energy building 

   * Low-energy house

Public health

edit

During 20th century, average lifespan in US increased by more than 30 years; 25 years of which attributed to advances in public health. (10 great achievements)

Ten Great Public Health Achievements -- United States, 1900-1999

"which has resulted in the eradication of smallpox; elimination of poliomyelitis in the Americas; and control of measles, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and other infectious diseases in the United States and other parts of the world."

(infection control doesn't really cover it, hand washing, water treatment, vector control, ...)

resulted from reducing risk-factors, such as smoking cessation and blood pressure control, as well as improved access to early detection and better treatment.

  • Safer and healthier foods (Healthy diet maybe?) - decreased microbial contamination and increased nutritional content.

"Identifying essential micronutrients and establishing food-fortification programs have almost eliminated major nutritional deficiency diseases such as rickets, goiter, and pellagra in the United States"

"Healthier mothers and babies have resulted from better hygiene and nutrition, availability of antibiotics, greater access to health care, and technologic advances in maternal and neonatal medicine. Since 1900, infant mortality has decreased 90%, and maternal mortality has decreased 99%."

"Access to family planning and contraceptive services has altered social and economic roles of women. Family planning has provided health benefits such as smaller family size and longer interval between the birth of children; increased opportunities for preconceptional counseling and screening; fewer infant, child, and maternal deaths; and the use of barrier contraceptives to prevent pregnancy and transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and other STDs."

and anti-smoking campaigns - prevent initiation, promote cessation, reduce environmental exposure.

"Ten Great Public Health Achievements -- United States, 1900-1999". 48 (12). April 2, 1999: 241-243. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

CDC (1999). "Ten great public health achievements—United States, 1900–1999". MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 48 (12): 241–3. PMID 10220250. Reprinted in: "Ten Great Public Health Achievements—United States, 1900-1999". JAMA. 281 (16): 1481. 1999. doi:10.1001/jama.281.16.1481. PMID 10227303.

-- "The choices for topics for this list were based on the opportunity for prevention and the impact on death, illness, and disability in the United States and are not ranked by order of importance."

"vaccination, which has resulted in the eradication of smallpox; elimination of poliomyelitis in the Americas; and control of measles, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and other infectious diseases in the United States and other parts of the world."

Lonelypages by quality etc template

edit

some priority some importance

By quality:

  • {{lonelypages|FA-Class {{{category}}}|category=FA-Class {{{category}}}}}
  • {{lonelypages|A-Class {{{category}}}|category=A-Class {{{category}}}}}
  • {{lonelypages|GA-Class {{{category}}}|category=GA-Class {{{category}}}}}
  • {{lonelypages|B-Class {{{category}}}|category=B-Class {{{category}}}}}
  • {{lonelypages|C-Class {{{category}}}|category=C-Class {{{category}}}}}
  • {{lonelypages|Start-Class {{{category}}}|category=Start-Class {{{category}}}}}
  • {{lonelypages|Stub-Class {{{category}}}|category=Stub-Class {{{category}}}}}

FL-Class List-Class

Template:Cat importance Template:Lonelypages by importance


|width = width of the graph (optional) |barwidth= width of the bararea (optional, defaults to 100px) |float = (left|right|none) (optional, defaults to none) |left2 = second left column header (optional) |right1 = first right column header (optional) |right2 = second right column header (optional) |left1 = first left column header (optional) |caption = caption under the chart (optional)}

Orphan progress
Jan 2009
 
 50
foo
 
 500

WPMED

  • Articles: 16439
  • No links, no lists: 661

{{Lonelypages|project=WPMED}}

Ambox styles

edit

Wikipedia talk:Template messages/Cleanup

Style usage is unclear in ambox

Why are these style templates rather than content? Template:Whereisit Template:Time-context Template talk:Context Template:Generalize Template:Gen-section

Why is orphan a style template? (e.g. rather than notice)

Wikipedia:Article_message_boxes


Orphan search - stubs?

Wikipedia:WikiProject Integration

  1. ^ a b c d Jeanet M. Kemmeren, Bea C. Tanis, Maurice A.A.J. van den Bosch, Edward L.E.M. Bollen, Frans M. Helmerhorst, Yolanda van der Graaf, Frits R. Rosendaal, and Ale Algra (2002). "Risk of Arterial Thrombosis in Relation to Oral Contraceptives (RATIO) Study: Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke". Stroke. 33 (5). American Heart Association, Inc.: 1202–1208. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000015345.61324.3F. PMID 11988591.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ a b c d Jean-Patrice Baillargeon, Donna K. McClish, Paulina A. Essah, and John E. Nestler (2005). "Association between the Current Use of Low-Dose Oral Contraceptives and Cardiovascular Arterial Disease: A Meta-Analysis". Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 90 (7). The Endocrine Society: 3863–3870. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1958. PMID 15814774.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ a b c d "Combined Estrogen-Progestogen Contraceptives" (PDF). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 91. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2007.
  4. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference speroff was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ a b Bast RC, Brewer M, Zou C; et al. (2007). "Prevention and early detection of ovarian cancer: mission impossible?". Recent Results Cancer Res. Recent Results in Cancer Research. 174: 91–100. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-37696-5_9. ISBN 978-3-540-37695-8. PMID 17302189. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h Chapter 30 - The reproductive system in: Rod Flower; Humphrey P. Rang; Maureen M. Dale; Ritter, James M. (2007). Rang & Dale's pharmacology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 978-0-443-06911-6.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ a b Karen Malec (2005-08-31). "World Health Organization: Oral Contraceptives and Menopausal Therapy Are 'Carcinogenic to Humans / Scientists' Findings Provide Additional Biological Support for an Abortion-Breast Cancer Link, Abortion Breast Cancer" (Press release). Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer.
  8. ^ FPA (April 2005). "The combined pill - Are there any risks?". Family Planning Association (UK). Archived from the original on 2007-02-08. Retrieved 2007-01-08.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  9. ^ a b Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1996). "Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies". Lancet. 347 (9017): 1713–27. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90806-5. PMID 8656904.
  10. ^ a b Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1996). "Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results". Contraception. 54 (3 Suppl): 1S–106S. doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(15)30002-0. PMID 8899264.
  11. ^ Plu-Bureau G, Lê M (1997). "Oral contraception and the risk of breast cancer". Contracept Fertil Sex. 25 (4): 301–5. PMID 9229520. - pooled re-analysis of original data from 54 studies representing about 90% of the published epidemiological studies, prior to introduction of third generation pills.
  12. ^ Crooks, Robert L. and Karla Baur (2005). Our Sexuality. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. ISBN 0-534-65176-3.
  13. ^ WHO (2005). Decision-Making Tool for Family Planning Clients and Providers Appendix 10: Myths about contraception
  14. ^ Holck, Susan. "Contraceptive Safety". Special Challenges in Third World Women's Health. 1989 Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association. Retrieved 2006-10-07.
  15. ^ FPA (April 2005). "The combined pill - Are there any risks?". Family Planning Association (UK). Archived from the original on 2007-02-08. Retrieved 2007-01-08.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  16. ^ Plu-Bureau G, Lê M (1997). "Oral contraception and the risk of breast cancer". Contracept Fertil Sex. 25 (4): 301–5. PMID 9229520. - pooled re-analysis of original data from 54 studies representing about 90% of the published epidemiological studies, prior to introduction of third generation pills.
  17. ^ Crooks, Robert L. and Karla Baur (2005). Our Sexuality. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. ISBN 0-534-65176-3.
  18. ^ WHO (2005). Decision-Making Tool for Family Planning Clients and Providers Appendix 10: Myths about contraception
  19. ^ Holck, Susan. "Contraceptive Safety". Special Challenges in Third World Women's Health. 1989 Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association. Retrieved 2006-10-07.
  20. ^ de Sanjosé S; et al. (2007). "Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis". Lancet Infect Dis. 7 (7): 453–9. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70158-5. PMID 17597569. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Zodon&oldid=1168398577"