Wikipedia

User:Lethe/supports

< User:Lethe
  1. Support. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Support. Great guy to have around. Dmharvey 06:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Support. Always polite. Will make a great admin. Fropuff 08:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Support --Terence Ong 09:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Support Astrotrain 10:01, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Support Proto t c 10:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Support seems good.  Grue  10:23, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. Support, why not? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 10:30, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  9. Support. From experience. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  10. Support --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 13:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  11. support - definitely - William M. Connolley 13:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  12. Support. —Kirill Lokshin 14:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  13. Support, I like him. - Phædriel ♥ tell me - 14:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  14. Support, everything looks good to me. - Bobet 14:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  15. Support our maths experts, on whom I rely to make numbers make sense. Xoloz 16:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  16. Support, of course. Fredrik Johansson - talk - contribs 17:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  17. Support. What I've seen from him in my short time here leaves me with nothing but good impression. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  18. Support - solid, diplomatic. --- --- Charles Stewart(talk) 19:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  19. Support. Seen this user around, a good impression. enochlau (talk) 22:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  20. Support. No reason to expect any misuse of the extra buttons. Zocky | picture popups 23:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  21. Support Good contributor, no evidence of problem behavior. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 00:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  22. Support. Took a good look and found nothing in his edit history to indicate he wouldn't be a responsible admin.--Dakota ~ ε 01:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  23. Support--Ugur Basak 03:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  24. Support, clearly an excellent editor. Chick Bowen 05:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  25. —Charles P.  (Mirv) 17:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  26. Support — Paul August ☎ 22:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  27. Support, but I forgot why. Radiant_>|< 22:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
    This is an odd support vote. What does it mean? Maybe it means you recognize the name, but don't recall from where. I can say the same thing about the name Radiant, I think. -lethe talk 23:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
    Lol. Have you forgotten the meaning of your own username? Radiant_>|< 23:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
    Oh, duh! I guess I did. -lethe talk 23:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
    For people who don't know what these two are talking about, see here. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:51, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  28. Support per all of above, pettiness of opposition, and excellent choice of username :) . Ncsaint 00:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  29. King of All the Franks 02:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  30. Support. Pschemp | Talk 13:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  31. Support. linas 14:25, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  32. Support, of course. - Mailer Diablo 17:42, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  33. Support has sufficient experience └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 19:35, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  34. Support absolutely --rogerd 03:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  35. Support --Bling-chav 13:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  36. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 14:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  37. Support. Mushroom 10:57, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  38. Support: --Bhadani 15:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  39. Support, unlikely to abuse admin tools. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  40. Support, a good editor. Ashibaka tock 01:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  41. Support, good editor. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-29 01:57Z
  42. Support. Seems like he will use the tools wisely. -- DS1953 talk 02:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  43. Support - This Wikipedian knows what "being bold" means, and consistently steers clear of "being reckless". Wonderful person to work with. --HappyCamper 17:06, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  44. Support. I'm around less, but my vote still counts.--CSTAR 18:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  45. Support –Joke 02:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  46. Support Expensivehat 02:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  47. Support Exemplary RFA candidate. --Madchester 03:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  48. Support based not on edit count but rather on contributions, answers to questions below, and the faith that other users I trust place in him as shown above above.   ⇔   | | ⊕ ⊥ (t-c-e) 07:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  49. Support - Very impressive editor and very thoughtful answers to questions, like what I've seen of his work, and I do not think all admins need to be AfD voters on every case. Lar: t/c 23:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  50. Moral support, mostly to get to be the 50th vote, but also because of the user's history of intelligent, reasoned edits. :) Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 23:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  51. Support most definitely. — Laura Scudder ☎ 02:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  52. Just-under-the-buzzer-Support as a very knowledgeable editor, and one who won't abuse the tools. I've seen his helpful edits all over the place at the math reference desk. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 07:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  53. Support No problems here. One with Her 07:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  54. Support Joanofanarchy 08:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lethe/supports&oldid=1082485692"