Do not edit this user pages, except for removal grossly offensive content or promotional. Revision is only allowed to be deleted if it is purely disruptive material or grossly offensive. Just because it violate policy does not mean it should be deleted (for example: Promotion is not permitted, but it is not enough to be deleted from history since it is not harmful, or it is just "ordinary" harmful) Typo fixing, grammar fixing and remove test edits is not allowed too; since user page is not where to publishing standard (whether these errors is accidental or purposefully, unless it's made by me or by anyone have permission) |
I don't favor anything. I can sometime edit an article about a topic more than anything else. That does not mean I favor these. Nor I try to claim ownership of an article (even if an article only have me as a substantive editor).
Most content that is violate Wikipedia policy do not need to be RevDel, as long as page remain. Why? The community need to be able to review action whether or not proper.
Unlike other Wikipedians, I avoid use shortcuts and instead explain what the policy I am linked to.