Talk:Zhang Jizhong

Untitled

Zhang Jizhong's works, especially tv series adapted from Jin Yong's novels, have always been subject to mixed, if not overwhelming negative, views. The comments and feedbacks regarding Zhang's works are not neutral according to Wiki's standard. No citation or source was given in relation to merits comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.242.193 (talk) 03:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Discovering Talent

Does Hu Jun belong in the same category? I feel like he isn't as famous or popular as the rest of the talents Zhang discovered. Gloriac2 (talk) 02:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Criticism

Since there has been a lot of criticism on Zhang's works, should we include a section that mentions that? Feel free to discuss here. Gloriac2 (talk) 03:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Also, it says that Zhang is "known for his contributions to preserve the environment," but on the same reference (11, right here) article, I quote "Filmmaker Zhang Jizhong has attracted attention for the Awards as well. He was in the bad books in 2006 when his crew damaged Jiuzhaigou National Park during filming. "Zhang [Jizhong] has made great improvements after he was accused of spoiling environment," noted Wang." Shouldn't we include this part instead of just say that he is known for his contributions to preserve the environment? Gloriac2 (talk) 03:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

NPOV

The article contains a lot of peacock terms and seems to praising Zhang throughout. Some of his works did not win any awards at all, so they shouldn't be overly-mentioned (eg: broadcast on whatever TV channels in whichever countries, subject to excellent reviews, having stunning scenery, good action choreography etc). Perhaps it'll be fine to just include them only in the filmography section. _LDS (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Zhang Jizhong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110718133944/http://ent.cn.yahoo.com/060824/352/28cit.html to http://ent.cn.yahoo.com/060824/352/28cit.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100128182616/http://www.lava-lava.com:80/topic/show/1063 to http://www.lava-lava.com/topic/show/1063
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100610054324/http://tv.ifensi.com:80/article-169274.html to http://tv.ifensi.com/article-169274.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)