Talk:Yeshivat Har Etzion
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of rosh yeshivas was copied or moved into Yeshivat Har Etzion with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Cyrillic
editShiurim in cyrillic?!?!? Cyrillic is an alphabet not a language! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.60.131 (talk) 09:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Shira -
Thank you for filling in the Gush article that I started. The content is very good, but most of it is also kind of POV and sounds more like a brochure than an encyclopedia article. If I have time, I will try to edit the article to make it more encyclopedic.
Kol tuv, DLand 22:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
I changed "liberation" to "capture." It was the most neutral term I could come up with; anyone would agree that Gush Etzion was captured. Also, this (re)conquest of Gush Etzion took place during the Six Day War, not after.
-Ben Stern
Wikipedia Pages for ramim
editI don't think every ram needs to be red-linked. Only the roshei yeshiva and figures well known outside the yeshiva should be, as the others will most likely not have articles written for them anytime soon (at least not on the english wikipedia site). But seeing as this could impinge on someone's כבוד, it's best if I don't do it. -שמואל —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.90.98 (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic writing style
editSorry, but alot of the article reads like a promotional brochure, and not like a neutral encyclopedia article. For example, the second paragraph reads: "YHE has a faculty of renowned Torah scholars whose diverse styles, backgrounds and approaches complement one another in an effort to create an open and challenging environment for students. The Rabbeim serve as exceptional role models who view themselves as mentors striving to imbue students with passionate, authentic, rational, and religiously intense lifestyle." There are several other places where this occurs, including the entire "values" section. While this language is great for the yeshiva website, it does not belong in an encyclopedia article. שמואל —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.90.98 (talk) 16:49, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Yeshivat Har Etzion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320120009/http://www.haretzion.org/faculty/roshei-yeshiva to http://www.haretzion.org/faculty/roshei-yeshiva
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Modern Orthodox?
editTheir essays and shiurim appear to be very Modern Orthodox, a conscious difference from Haredi Orthodoxy. But the article presently doesn't quite indicate the stance of the school of such issues. Looking at their VBM it appears to be at least as modern Orthodox as RIETS at Yeshivah University, and the RCA (Rabbinical Council of America.) Considering the shift to the right at RIETS and the RCA over the last generation, might it be fair to say that Yeshivat Har Etzion is decidedly modern Orthodox, as opposed to the more "right" Centrist Orthodox? Is any significant part of Yeshivat Har Etzion as open as Open Orthodoxy? What kind of teachings do they have about Masorti Judaism? Do any of their faculty have any cooperation with non-Orthodox Judaism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.63.98 (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)