Talk:Wiki
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wiki article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Wiki was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
The contents of the City wiki page were merged into Wiki on 8 December 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
(possibly) promotional paragraph
the third paragraph of this article, the part talking about wikipedia, sounds a little promotional to me. it mentions some extra content about wikipedia that is either not necessary, or conveyed in a way to make wikipedia sound special in some way. but i'm a student, and i don't know everything about grammar, tone, and stuff like that so idk, tell me what you guys think and if we should change it
"Wikiwikiwiki" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikiwikiwiki and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Wikiwikiwiki until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 08:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- That is what I thought too! It sounded like WP:COI, but a bit more subtle. I do not know how to change it so it could be more neutral. My best guess is we add examples of other wikis, but the problem is there are not really any other wikis. Otherwise, we could have moved it to the history paragraph, and with a little bit of editing it would probably fit. But, there is a paragraph with roughly the same idea. Candylinsky (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
"Transwiki" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Transwiki and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6 § Transwiki until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
"Wiki Wiki Wiki" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wiki Wiki Wiki and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § Wiki Wiki Wiki until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 04:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Editing body of knowledge and reference list
I am editing the body of knowledge by rephrasing the sentences to suit the proper grammar and clarity of language. I am also updating the reference list to be more abreast with modern and current knowledge that is related. The decision-making topic should be a subtopic under responsibilities and should be updated to suit the current trends. Pbuahbas (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)