Former good articleWiki was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 16, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 28, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 15, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 13, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
July 2, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 25, 2005, March 25, 2012, and March 25, 2015.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of May 9, 2007.
Current status: Delisted good article

(possibly) promotional paragraph

the third paragraph of this article, the part talking about wikipedia, sounds a little promotional to me. it mentions some extra content about wikipedia that is either not necessary, or conveyed in a way to make wikipedia sound special in some way. but i'm a student, and i don't know everything about grammar, tone, and stuff like that so idk, tell me what you guys think and if we should change it

"Wikiwikiwiki" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikiwikiwiki and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Wikiwikiwiki until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Capsulecap (talkcontribs) 08:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

That is what I thought too! It sounded like WP:COI, but a bit more subtle. I do not know how to change it so it could be more neutral. My best guess is we add examples of other wikis, but the problem is there are not really any other wikis. Otherwise, we could have moved it to the history paragraph, and with a little bit of editing it would probably fit. But, there is a paragraph with roughly the same idea. Candylinsky (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Transwiki" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Transwiki and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6 § Transwiki until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Wiki Wiki Wiki" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wiki Wiki Wiki and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § Wiki Wiki Wiki until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 04:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editing body of knowledge and reference list

I am editing the body of knowledge by rephrasing the sentences to suit the proper grammar and clarity of language. I am also updating the reference list to be more abreast with modern and current knowledge that is related. The decision-making topic should be a subtopic under responsibilities and should be updated to suit the current trends. Pbuahbas (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply