Talk:Whale fall

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 96.79.96.125 in topic Carbon sequestration comparison to trees

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 17 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sgtrab01. Peer reviewers: Alithia93.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Metric System

edit

This article uses feet to describe the depth of the fall. Should it be converted to meters? 2000ft = 609m, 6600ft = 2011km. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.145.124.27 (talk) 14:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio?

edit

http://psychcentral.com/psypsych/Whale_fall

This article seems to have been copied directly from the above address, but I am not sure what action should be taken. So I'll have to leave it in someone else's capable hands.

This article was not copied from the psychcentral.com site - I wrote the original version myself. Psychcentral.com appears to be one of many sites mirroring Wikipedia content. - Jpo 01:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
My mistake
This seems to happen a lot and confuses/angers many people. I'm not sure if the following text was recently posted, but psychcentral does have the following verbage on their site: "This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Whale fall". Via Personal Open Wikipedia (beta) open source software by J Grohol and Psych Central. (If you would like to edit this document, click on the Wikipedia article link above.)" Phauge 23:01, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Picture

edit

Someone please tag as "needs picture". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.202.0.41 (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done. Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 03:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sinking?

edit

Why would a blubbery animal such as a whale fall at all when it dies? You'd expect the carcass to float. Difluoroethene (talk) 15:30, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

All species of large whale sink when they die, some more than others. Even bowhead and right whales occasionally sank after they were killed by whalers (one of the ways many were lost). Blue, fin, and sei typically sank, as did humpback and gray. Sperm were said to sink the least often (at least during the open-boat era). During the modern era they had to pump the whales full of air to keep them afloat. SaberToothedWhale (talk) 02:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

reference 2 "http://www.columbia.edu/~rwb2103/whale/whalefallintro.html Whale fall intro." is broken. Slibville (talk) 20:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Fixed, thanks. Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 10:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Whale fall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Whale fall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lateral advection

edit

What is "lateral advection" that is described in the Contribution to the biological pump section? I think it would be helpful to either provide a link here or to provide a short definition. I also think that there needs to be an extra comma in that sentence so that it reads: "Lateral advection of carbon, especially in coastal areas, contributes to this deficit in the model, but food falls are also another source of organic carbon for the deep ocean". Mnjenkins22 (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I know nothing about all this, but following the "be bold" wikipedia guideline, I added a link to the advection page (which I discovered when doing it :-) ). As for the "lateral", I can only guess it means stuff moves around the same depth, not from bottom to surface or the reverse. But I fully agree, the whole paragraph is very technical. Jrob kiwi (talk) 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

How fast do they fall?

edit

How long does it take for a carcass to reach the sea floor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:1DE0:8FB0:C4BD:22C8:872C:946A (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I just played around to see if that one is easily answered... :-) Here's a possible answer, not sure how much it holds.

We're looking for an approximation, or order of magnitude. I found a formula here: https://www.quora.com/How-fast-does-an-object-drop-in-water I applied it to the following:

  • mass = 30,000 kg (result of a simple web search for weight of whales, here a sperm whale)
  • g = 10 (simpler than 9,8)
  • area facing the fall = surface of the belly of a whale = 30m long, 5m wide, so 150 m2
  • C = 1, because I have no idea what it is but it seems like a good order of magnitude, see drag coefficient

The result is a speed of 2m/s. If we consider a depth of 2000m, that's 1000s fall, so around 20mn (an hour is 3,600s).

So final answer is: 20mn, with a very high imprecision :-) It seems quite short, but after all 2km is a big depth, but not much of a distance... it's a bit like walking, really.

I have zero expertise here, so it's probably false because of water density changes along the way. (oh and apologies if this really doesn't belong in the discussion page of wikipedia) Jrob kiwi (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shipwrecks ...

edit

Given the large number of ships which have sunk to the deep ocean over the years, some of which would have hundreds or even thousands of humans on board (as well as other animals such as cattle and horses), ghoulish as it may seem, has anyone tried looking at these ? The Yeti (talk) 15:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

a quick web search yielded this, which seems to confirm your assumption: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41396-021-00978-y (a scientific article from April 2021, so maybe it was written in response to your posting :-D ) Jrob kiwi (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: EEB 4611-Biogeochemical Processes-Spring 2024

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 11 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LynSchwendy (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by LynSchwendy (talk) 03:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Carbon sequestration comparison to trees

edit

"It is estimated that, in terms of carbon sequestration, each whale is equivalent to thousands of trees." - This statement should be removed. It doesn't pass the smell test - a single large tree significantly outweighs a whale both in carbon content and overall. The linked source compares the total CO2 sequestration per whale to the carbon sequestration per tree per year - not an apples to apples comparison. 96.79.96.125 (talk) 15:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply