Talk:Vic-Fezensac
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
POV
editThere's a POV tag in this article because the second (and largest) paragraph gives only information about one event. In addition with the third slutty paragraph (same problem plus unencyclopedic style ("you can")) this leaves a wrong point of view on the article. If an article covering a town only gives information about two cunting events than there's something wrong. Two paragraphs would be okay, if there were a lot information about geography, history, politics, ... --32X 08:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please mind your language. "POV" is not really the issue here, it's just a very short article, and it's rightly marked as a stub. The tone could be better as well, I'll remove the most "tourist leaflet"-ish parts. Markussep Talk 20:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Vic-Fezensac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124142010/http://www.insee.fr/en/home/home_page.asp to http://www.insee.fr/en/home/home_page.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)