This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.unitedautosports.com. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2010081310007864. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.
Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Where is all my content and images? TParis00ap said they cleaned up the article 'a little', but ALL of my content and images are now GONE. This is not acceptable. I noted MANY notable sources. Am I not seeing the revisions correctly? Remember, we're not all pros like the Wiki administrators. Bgoodman0310 (talk) 19:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
You do not WP:OWN the article, therefore there's no requirement for your work to remain. Your work was highly promotional and biased and served no encyclopedic use and therefore was removed in order to save the article from being deleted. Had we kept your work, the article almost certainly would have been deleted. The359 (Talk) 19:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have to disagree. I made major strides to make the article unbiased and nonpromotional. It was simply an encyclopedic view of what United Autosports is as a racing team and the ownership of such team. It is very similar to that of Penske's wikipedia page. Bgoodman0310 (talk) 20:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Disagree you may, but the article was still heavily biased, promotional, and not encyclopedic. Changing a few buzzwords was not the fix to the problem. The359 (Talk) 20:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.