Talk:Tropical Storm Dorothy

Tropical Storm Dorothy has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 19, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 10 February 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. There is a consensus that the 1970 storm is the primary topic for "Tropical Storm Dorothy". Jenks24 (talk) 09:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tropical Storm Dorothy (1970) → Tropical Storm Dorothy – Only Atlantic storm named Dorothy. 219.79.180.200 (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Comment was there at one point a consensus in WP Weather to have weather time event articles titled in a way that makes the most critical identifier of the time event, the year, visible to readers? As it stands the title "Tropical Storm Dorothy (1970)" is doing no harm to anyone, only providing benefit. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Strong support There is consensus for removing unnecessary disambiguators. Ppp ery 22:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Support - Sure. The most notable Dorothy by a safe margin. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Comment: This move was requested by a sock of User:N-C16. — Gorthian (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oppose; is this really more likely to be the subject of the term "Tropical Storm Dorothy" than all (in this case, two) of the other topics to which the name refers? Yes, we get rid of unnecessary disambiguation, but the disambiguation seems necessary in this case, as far as I see it. Nyttend (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
- The answer to that question is an unequivocal "yes", as far as I can tell. This storm killed dozens of people and left many hundreds in destitution, while the others had no discernible impact whatsoever. If you're of the opinion that the tropical cyclone WikiProject should always use the year modifiers except in cases of retired storms, like we've done for most of Wikipedia's history, that's a different story and I don't necessarily disagree. This Dorothy is clearly the primary topic, though. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic