Talk:Timeline of stegosaur research

A fact from Timeline of stegosaur research appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 June 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that over the course of the history of stegosaur research, their iconic back plates have been thought to function as armor plating, to regulate body temperature, or to attract mates?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of stegosaur research.

Wikipedia

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ankylosaurs

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Up until the 1920s or '30s, ankylosaurs were considered a subgroup of stegosaurs, until somebody decided to elevate them to their own "order." Should they be included or mentioned? Dinoguy2 (talk) 17:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

The anky-stego split is mentioned under the 1927 heading. Abyssal (talk) 17:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Missing genera

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What about Changdusaurus, Amargastegos, Eoplophysis, Yingshanosaurus, Gigantspinosaurus or Ferganastegos?184.186.6.124 (talk) 02:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic