Talk:The Rain King

The Rain King has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

The Rain King is part of the The X-Files (season 6) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 4, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
July 25, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

This episode had Russian Orthodox music in it!

GA Review

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Rain King/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 20:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Gave things a polish, looking alright now.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Seems grand. Removed a bit of overcite, where a few instances of the same citation in a row could have been collapsed into each other.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Scope seems grand, reception's good for a late-season ep. I could expand it more but it's good enough to pass for now.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Not a problem.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Grand.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Image needs something to tie it specifically to the article. Maybe it could be abandoned and replaced with one showing the character's missing leg, as the effects for that are discussed in the article.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Just going to stick this on hold to see if the image can be swapped; if you don't have access to the episode then let me know and I'll go get mine. Should be grand otherwise. GRAPPLE X 20:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK, I uploaded a new one that show's him attaching his fake leg, along with a blurb about it.--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yep, that's perfect. Going to pass this one now. GRAPPLE X 00:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic