Talk:Technoethics
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on June 23, 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Merge proposal |
due to the similarity of the two terms, that causes big mistakes, for example in Italy where the main author of the italian dictionary did a mashup between the two term, I think is better to explain the two term togheter
Technoethics versus technoetic
editSeparate topics need separate articles; the fact that "ethics" is etica (without an h) in Italian has no bearing on the matter. If you think that "technoetic" deserves an article—though its usage seems to be limited to a small circle of artists and theorists—write an article with that title. Wikipedia doesn't do articles about multiple topics; if necessary, disambiguating expressions are included in the titles if the names are homographs, but that isn't even the case here. Deor (talk) 14:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Technoethic versus technoetics
editdear deor I understand that separate topics need separate articles; but I do not agree with your statement that the fact that "ethics" is etica (without an h) in Italian has no bearing on the matter (!!). "technoetic" is a very important new term is a very important in a wide circle of artists and theorists. I can undertsand if you state that Wikipedia doesn't do articles about multiple topics; and if necessary, disambiguating expressions are included in the titles if the names are homographs, and this is even the case here. So I do not understand your attitude, it's very important to describe two terms in this similar way. Technoetic is a term that is very important ina wide area of art, technology and science. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thinkandsee (talk • contribs) 14:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- They are not the same word, and the article should not be discussing 'technoetic' which I agree is important. Doug Weller (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2008 (UTC)