Talk:Sri Venkateswara Junior College
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sri Venkateswara Junior College article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Vin09 (talk · contribs) on 21 November 2014 with the comment: No references and no subject for articles notability It was contested by Necrothesp (talk · contribs) on 26 November 2014 with the comment: deprod; colleges are notable |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notable alumni
editNotable according to WP:BIO? I notice a contributor here keeps adding their name in. Do you think it is a good idea to try and show the world via Wikipedia how notable you think you are when you can't even supply references for this article? I'm thinking the only reason you want the article on the College here is so you can add your name to it. Since Chintapalli David Raju was speedy deleted (twice) doesn't that tell you there is a notability problem? So what about being a Pi memorist, that is just trivial when considering notability for biographical articles here on Wikipedia.--Sting au Buzz Me... 04:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
It seems that Chintapalli David Raju has been cornered.Delinking can satisfy or need to produce ducuments to prove his aluminous from this college? Is it courtesy to use the phrase SO WHAT to comment world class pi memorist? --Ganitha (talk) 08:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Did I say "world class"? I didn't did I. To show that a person is notable you need to be able to satisfy the criteria listed at WP:BIO. For verifiability see WP:V. I removed the listed persons under the notable alumni section because there are absolutely no refs (see WP:RS) to show and verify how these people are notable.--Sting au Buzz Me... 12:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Not "world class".Your phrase"So what about being a Pi memorist" is corect to use here?---Ganitha (talk) 13:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
This talk page was deleted with the following comment
editTo admins like Sting au this page is useless.Since this page was started by me,I respect their feeling by closing this page permanently.Thank you-Chintapalli David Raju(---Mathsdavid (talk) 12:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)) page restored by User:Orangemike
- I'm not an admin Chintapalli. Also you should really not be using all those different accounts to do your edits here. It is called using sock puppets. Please see WP:SOCK.--Sting au Buzz Me... 13:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Reliable sources
editThe Pi website is not a reliable source. It has no references from reliable published sources. This could be anybody's website? You need published news sources to satisfy WP:RS. Please read WP:V.--Sting au Buzz Me... 10:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)