Talk:Sleep (painting)
Latest comment: 11 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sleep (painting) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Sleep (painting) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a rich Nawab rejected the offer of Amrita Sher-Gil’s Nude of Indira, Three Girls and the Villagers? Source: See quotes in article. Amrita Sher-Gil: A Self-Portrait in Letters and Writings. New Delhi: Tulika Books. pp. 271-285. ISBN 978-81-89487-59-1
- ALT1: ... that the Indian National Congressman Diwan Chaman Lall failed to get rid of a painting of the Nude Indira (pictured)? Source: 1938 - left "Indu's nude" with Diwan Chaman Lall "to see if he could palm it off on someone but he wasn't successful". Sundaram, pp. 522-523
- Reviewed: Lonnie R. Bristow
Created by Whispyhistory (talk). Self-nominated at 05:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Sleep (painting); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Pending completion of QPQ. Otherwise, review of the sources (aided by Earwig) shows no plagiarism or paraphrasing concerns. Sourcing appears to successfully verify both facts in both hooks. Good work, just waiting on the QPQ. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you...qpq should be Lonnie R. Bristow please. Whispyhistory (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's not quite done, but given you submitted a suggested alt on your QPQ several days ago, I'm going to call it complete. The painting is in the public domain for the reasons provided on the Commons (which I confirmed). I approve using the painting for the hook. Great work. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you...qpq should be Lonnie R. Bristow please. Whispyhistory (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)