Talk:Sea Launch

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Question

edit

The following question was added to the main page by someone. I have removed it and am putting here on the discussion page where it belongs:

"(should this should be moved into entry dedicated to discussion of space-launches?)"

The question was placed in and refers to the section entitled "Advantages of equatorial ocean-platform based launches"

Jafafa Hots 16:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also~how much does it cost to deliver one load in to orbit? What is the maximum altitude of this system for a typical load? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.234.149.2 (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

From the ashes

edit

Before its extensive re-engineering, the Ocean Odyssey launch platform was originally the Piper Alpha oil drilling platform which suffered from a devastating disaster in July 1988 in which 167 men were killed. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piper_Alpha

04:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC) —User:65.27.159.71

See Talk:Piper Alpha for discussion. —Fleminra 05:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Note - According to Oleg Sukovoy, a worker on the conversion team, the Ocean Odyssey was the vessel which eventually became the Odyssey. The Piper Alpha disaster happened two months earlier. See: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/o.sukovoy/Sea Launch.htm

Here is a picture of the original Ocean Odyssey fire: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/o.sukovoy/Ocean Odyssey.htm

Weather advantages

edit

I removed the statement about equatorial advantages: "Superior weather conditions, as the launch site is located in the "doldrums" with few storms and almost no lightning.". This is not true... the equator gets its share of storms and weather; see the article Intertropical Convergence Zone and any climate article on an equatorial locale like Geography and climate of Singapore. It is true that the equator is free from tropical cyclones, but even this is only a seasonal concern. -Rolypolyman 18:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Payload enclosures"

edit

Under the ownership section the article states that Boeing is responsible for the payload "enclosures". Shouldn't this be "payload fairings"? Or is Boeing also responsible for other enclosures such as payloading shipping containers or processing facilities? If we're only talking about the "nosecone" of the rocket, then "payload fairings" is a more accurate description - Taka2007 21:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Out of date

edit

This article is out of date. Anything new since 2010? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.102.102.5 (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/sealaunch/
    Triggered by \baerospace-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 09:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Share since 2010 - wrong source

edit

Source linked under #Ownership and business table of shares, column Share (Since 2010) doesn't include information about percentage of shares provided in said column. SkywalkerPL (talk) 19:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

It is, and while it could potentially be organised a little better, it works well with the original shares column. Quote:
"Sea Launch emerged from bankruptcy in 2010. As part of the plan of reorganization, a subsidiary of RSC Energia increased its ownership to 95 percent from 25 percent, the lawsuit said. Boeing and Kvaerner, now called Aker Maritime Finance AS, split the remaining 5 percent."
Huntster (t @ c) 06:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Cheers, thanks for clarification. I completely missed that. SkywalkerPL (talk) 08:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sea Launch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sea Launch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply