Talk:Sandia Cave

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico (assessed as Mid-importance).

NHL summary webpage-supported content

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I notice that quoted material was just removed, with edit summary justifying the removal due to the material not being properly cited. I don't mind the article being changed, but want to register that the quoted material was previously cited properly IMHO, when I created the article back in 2008, and that some content might usefully be restored. It seems the source webpage has disappeared or its URL has changed, and/or it seems that subsequent editing messed up the citation.

The original content was sourced from "nhlsum" source,^[1] and the article included the following:

A statement of its significance in 1961 read:

Excavations here have yielded information on three distinct prehistoric groups. Situated in Cibola National Forest, the site represents one of the earliest known occupations of the Americas.^[1]

A recent condition report is:

Sandia Cave appears to be in satisfactory condition. This natural cave is located in a limestone cliff face above Los Huertas Creek in the Sandia Mountains. The cave was prehistorically occupied and has been intensively excavated. The site is publicly-accessible via a quarter-mile trail and a metal circular staircase leading to the cave entrance. The length of the cave is unknown and the inspection was preformed on the first ten meters of the interior; after this point the cave narrows and artificial lighting is necessary. This site is not at risk from environmental or natural causes. Since the site has been thoroughly excavated, there are no portable artifacts, walls, or fragile components that need to be protected. The greatest threat to this site is the potential for vandalism. The site has experienced heavy vandalism over the past several years. The entrance to the cave is covered in graffiti done primarily with spray paint but markers, chalk, crayons, and etching have also been used. The graffiti also appears on the bars and railings that support the staircase and cage-like entry way. More graffiti is present within the cave but is slightly less dense than at the cave entrance. The ceiling of the cave is covered with a heavy layer of soot from prehistoric occupation and graffiti has been applied to many parts of the soot.
There does not appear to be a significant amount of new graffiti within the cave since the last report, although some of the more recent graffiti (possibly within the last year) covers a large area. There are no other changes to the site itself since the last report.^[1]

It was declared a National Historic Landmark in 1961.^[1]

References

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d "Sandia Cave". National Historic Landmark summary listing. National Park Service. Retrieved 2008-06-14.

I agree with anyone that the article does not now need such a long quote, but it did serve to provide decent, substantial information for almost a decade. And it was fully proper, being 100 percent public domain material in fact. Some edited-down content, such as a summary of the 2008 risk assessment of the site's condition, might usefully be restored to the article, IMHO. --do ncr am 23:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[nhlsum-1] "Sandia Cave". National Historic Landmark summary listing. National Park Service. Retrieved 2008-06-14.

[1]