Talk:Catholic Church in Scotland

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Catholic Church in Scotland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dioceseofaberdeen.org/index.php/diocese/statistics
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708090711/http://www.bpsconfscot.com/CatholicScotland/tabid/57/Default.aspx to http://www.bpsconfscot.com/CatholicScotland/tabid/57/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

h.m.

The English has traditionally capitalized titles, mr. lunker. Do we, for example, write u.n.e.s.c.o or unesco ? Pamour (talk) 17:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

If this is addressed to me, I do not know what it means. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Catholic Church naming conventions RfC

There is currently an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Catholic Church)#RfC: should this page be made a naming convention that may be of interest. Chicbyaccident (talk) 09:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Pogrom

The request for a quotation from the source ("does source really term this a "pogrom", which tends to imply wholesale massacre & destruction & applied to jews? otherwise loaded/hyperbolic") to which you refer was to confirm its use of the the term to describe events. As it clearly does not, the appropriate action would be to simply remove the contested term, or replace it with a more measured one (a riot, for example, is not a pogrom). If the quote had confirmed the use of the term, posting the quote on the talk page would be the appropriate way to demonstrate this and, with consensus, the tag could be removed from the point in the article. Dumping another lengthy quote into an article (as appears to be your problematic m.o.) is the worst of both worlds, particularly pointless as it confirmed the lack of support for your wording. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Multiple issues

This article has multiple issues, largely as a consequence of a recent campaign of editing, also affecting multiple other articles and discussed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Scotland#Bloating_in_Gaels_articles,_again. Mutt Lunker (talk) 19:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)