The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An image used in this article, File:Lager Olvi.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Please do not misquote. That is nt "policy", those are the template's instructions, which are not policy. The only things that are pilicy are those things which have been approved to be policy by the Wikiedia community. The template instructions have not been so they are not "policy", they are a guideline for the use of the template. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Beyond My Ken: As you revert my edit let me explain. You added paid contributor template to article without problem in the article content. In this particular case edit was adding the infobox which you checked as you added the diff to the talkpage. Please remove restore my edit and remove the problem template or explain rationale why it should stay. --Zache (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
The article has been edited by a paid editors, therefore the 'pad contributions" template is justified. Some editors seem to feel that putting the template on the article requires starting a discussion. I do not agree, but I started one anyway, this very thread. Therefore the requirements of the template have been met. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I dont see how you answered what kind of content is in this change which would require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. If there is no need for the cleanup i will remove the template. Zache (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I removed the paid content tag as where were no other added content than infobox and no rationale for the problems were given. --Zache (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
