Talk:Newell Snow Booth/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 06:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Starts GA Review Page. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 06:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Observations
editHTML document size: 54 kB Prose size (including all HTML code): 10188 B References (including all HTML code): 11 kB Wiki text: 9143 B Prose size (text only): 5047 B (857 words) "readable prose size" References (text only): 2804 B
- It is reasonably well written.
- Page layout is fine.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- 9 citations from Shavit do not give page numbers.
- 11 citations from General Commission on Archives and History: Archives Center Catalog do not give page numbers. (Some pages extremely difficult to read)
- The United Methodist Handbook is not a relevant reference.
- Prominent Personalities in American Methodism gives a snippet view which cannot be reasonably read. It is a mention, only, at best.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is difficult to ascertain. Only one reference is accessible, and that is difficult to read in places.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Page created 1 July 2020
- Page has 36 edits by 10 editors
- 90 day page views = 89, average of 1 view daily.
- DYK on 30 July 2020 brought 2,733 page views
- Page history shows steady development, no edit warring observed.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No images on this page.
- Overall: ✗ Fail
- The references do not conform to WP:VERIFY. In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Can't check the major references here. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:46, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
</p