Talk:New York State Route 427/GA1
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Dana boomer in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I guess I'll take this one too! Should have the full review up soon... Dana boomer (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The lead could stand to be expanded some, with a summary of the history of the route.
- In the Route Description section you have a partial sentence that reads "eaves Southport".
- Same section you say "Shortly passing NY 368, NY 427". Should this be "shortly before passing" or "shortly after passing" or something?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Ref 11 (Nat'l Bridge Inventory) should be formatted like everything else
- Ref 12 (Empire State Roads) needs a publisher and access date. Also, what makes this reliable, as it appears to be a self-published source?
- What makes Ref 14 (Gribble Nation) a reliable source?
- The last sentence of the first paragraph of the Truncation and realignment section could use a ref. It's nothing controversial, but it'd be nice...
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A few comments about prose and referencing, so I am going to put the article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Done for the most part, trying to solve reference 11.Mitch32(UP) 21:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article. Thanks, as always, for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)