Talk:National Forces Alliance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please put in some sources for this. See WP:RS and WP:Verifiability. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Jbhunley (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Women
editWhat about its stance to :
- women rights
- religious rights
Moderate Islamism
editIf party leader is saying that "Some channels started referring to the National Forces Alliance as liberals – that's not true," stated Jibril. "It is composed of different political formations." and that the NFA is a moderate Islamic movement that recognises the importance of Islam in political life and favours Sharia as the basis of the law and NFA is eager to play down the "liberal" label then what is the problem ??? why it is not allowed to mention it as an "Moderate Islamist" party ??? Ahmed 313-326 —Preceding undated comment added 20:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Forces Alliance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://46.4.48.8/cablegate/wire.php?id=09TRIPOLI386&search=jibril National Economic Development Board - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121022142310/http://pomed.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Previewing-Libyas-Elections.pdf to http://pomed.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Previewing-Libyas-Elections.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)