Talk:NCSoft
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NCSoft article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "NCSoft" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| Archives: 1 |
Requested move 1 January 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition to this. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 16:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
NCSOFT → NCsoft – According to MOS:CAMELCASE, title of this article should not be all caps. NCsoft is the next popular capitalization found on the Internet. Voidvector (talk) 07:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support move per nom. ONR (talk) 19:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: User:ukexpat, this would reverse your move 14:03, 28 March 2013 Ukexpat (talk | contribs | block) . . (20 bytes) ( 20) . . (Ukexpat moved page NCsoft to NCSOFT: Per OTRS 2013032810000864)... care to comment on that? Andrewa (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
MXM defunct
editI saw on the Master X Master page that the servers are closing down today. Someone should update this article to move MXM to "Cancelled" since the game is no longer active. 72.197.9.171 (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 11 September 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: MOVED to NCSoft; no consensus to move to NCSOFT Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC) Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
NCsoft → NCSOFT – Reversal of previous RM. The referenced guideline was MOS:CAMELCASE but I do not think that was the most applicable guideline since "ncsoft" does not consist of complete words, but rather an initialism ("NC") followed by an abbreviation ("soft", presumably for software). Therefore there is no "standard English" representation of this mark. Instead, I believe the guideline that should apply is MOS:ACRO, which covers initialisms and abbreviations. It is also preferable IMO to avoid the ambiguity of what the "proper" camelcase would be (e.g. "NCsoft" or "NCSoft"), as in either case Wikipedia is basically inventing the convention.
As an aside, it was not specified how the original requester determined that one was more popular than the other, but for example these recent articles[1][2] use "NCSoft". The very definition of camel case would also imply that "Soft" should begin with a capital as it is the start of a word unit. If "NCSOFT" is still considered improper, then also consider "NCSoft" as a preferable alternative. Ham Pastrami (talk) 22:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. –Ammarpad (talk) 14:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support move to NCSoft. As stated in the last RM (in which I was a participant), the name "NCSOFT" would violate MOS:TMRULES. Given that reliable sources use "NCSoft" as you stated, it seems like the best option. ONR (talk) 03:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Move to NCSoft, as that seems more like ordinary English and is used in some independent reliable sources. Oppose NCSOFT, since that is less like English and clearly a vanity all-caps styling. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.