Talk:Morality and religion
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morality and religion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Reference chain problem
editI tried to track down the referenced article "Religion's Effects On Crime Rates", cited as being by Edgar Saint George. The citation gives only a broken weblink. The actual reference that the cited, no-longer existing web article summarized is an article "Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies: A First Look" by Gregory S. Paul in the Journal of Religion and Society of the Creighton university of Omaha, Nebraska: http://moses.creighton.edu/jrs/2005/2005-11.pdf. Philgoetz (talk) 23:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Morals, values, and ethics
edit- I changed the word "moral" to "value" or "ethics" in some cases throughout the article. Various commentators, including religious ones, separate the idea of religion and morality. Thus, the use of a term like "religious morals" (or even "secular morals" for that matter) is essentially begging the question. As a result, the use of terms that don't make an assertion through their very use seems indicated.
- This does not, of course, preclude the inclusion of passages from commentators using such terms if they are notable and relevant. In fact, a few such statements exist in the article now. --Airborne84 (talk) 17:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Neutrality
editI've gone through the article a number of times and I feel that the "positive-correlation" side has less material than the "negative-correlation" side despite the beginning of the article stating that the relationship is "complex" and difficult to understand. If there is more material to support that morality negatively impacts religion, then I feel that the beginning of the article should reflect that stance. Otherwise, I would suggest complimenting the "criticism" section with support for the contrary.
I may be pointing this out partially out of bias since I would say I am more "pro-positive correlation," but I find no mention of the counterargument for justification of religious text to commit crimes. There is no mention of strict or loose interpretations of said text. For example, the article claims that Hitler used Christianity as a justification to persecute the Jews, but I am certain there is the existence of credible sources that argue that Hitler was merely capitalizing on his self-identified faith and was really killing Jews primarily for other reasons. There is no mention of the possible relationship between humanitarianism and religion as noted in this study I found: http://www.humanitarianforum.org/data/files/resources/752/en/Geneva-Review-30.pdf
An example I wish to use to underscore this is the period of Spanish Colonization of the Americas. Not everyone knows that Christopher Columbus was a conqueror that abused religion as a justification for the pillaging and murder of millions of indigenous people, but fewer people recognize the efforts of Bartolome de las Casas, a man who literally risked his life several times to promote the rights of the indigenous people and bring awareness to the atrocities Spanish colonialists were committing. Many of his actions were motivated by religious reasons and they were arguably more authentic than whatever justification Columbus used. As such, I think more examples of humanitarian efforts inspired by religion should be added to the article.
I think it would be best to have the neutrality of this article in dispute. MikamiLovesDeleting (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
This is not objective article, it is biased and anti-religious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.110.83 (talk) 10:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC) This seems less like a discussion about morality in religion and more like an anti-religious tirade. 54.166.166.254 (talk) 23:59, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Unsourced material in the lede
editI removed the below passages from the lede. They seem to be unsourced. They also appear to engage in a discussion of what morality is. That may stray a bit too far from what is needed since this article can simply point to other articles that discuss this—with sources.
"Moral compass" is a metaphor or action for the direction one is compelled to take based on the ability to justify one's actions based on reasoning. Morality is an active process that requires critical thinking and consideration whereas religions expect adherence to religious codes, generalized and absolute rules that must not be broken or must be actively performed or carried out, depending on the religion and its rules. The distinction between morality as a verb and morality as a noun, is paramount in understanding what morality is, or simply put, how one ought to live.
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Morality and religion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219120231/http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/15-familykids/42-new-marriage-and-divorce-statistics-released to http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/15-familykids/42-new-marriage-and-divorce-statistics-released
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008201939/http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/data_access/data/datasets/social_capital_community_survey.html to http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/data_access/data/datasets/social_capital_community_survey.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426001742/http://brewright.com/articles/If You Love Me, Keep My Commandments.pdf to http://brewright.com/articles/If You Love Me, Keep My Commandments.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111214113448/http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html to http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111223113530/http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2006/2006-7.html to http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2006/2006-7.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111214113448/http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html to http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111214113448/http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html to http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Religious and moral education
editMoral values attached to sacred places 41.223.75.81 (talk) 11:10, 30 September 2022 (UTC)