Untitled

edit

I'll fix and add more info soon. Yet, about the genre- I think it's more dream pop/folk than a very wide-ranged title "Alternative" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fresh123456 (talkcontribs) 17:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Un-merging from Audrye Sessions' page

edit

In my opinion, the band has gotten enough of a reputation since 2014 that they deserve their own article instead of being merged Audrye Sessions. The Audrye Sessions page barely even goes into detail about the band, the pages for their albums have more information in them. Does anybody else think it's time to give them their own page now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.174.17 (talk) 15:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think it's time to recreate this article

edit

Low Roar might not have been independently notable the last time around. But I'm pretty sure they are now. They have a couple albums out and have toured the US and EU. Here are some references that might help for recreating the article:

85.144.182.132 (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Low Roar should get a separate article

edit

I agree with the comments above. An active band with >75,000 Facebook fans and several million plays on Spotify should definitely have their own page and not redirect to an old and outdated project that had some personal overlap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zwodrei (talkcontribs) 14:38, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Renamed page to Low Roar

edit

In light of the discussions on both pages, I've pointed Audrye Sessions to Low Roar, and moved the content of the former to the latter. Low Roar has far surpassed Audrye Sessions' notability. I think the eventual best course of action, though, would be to separate the pages. Zera555 (talk) 03:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Audrye Sessions which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I completed this split today. For further comments see Talk:Audrye Sessions#Splitting is done.---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Death Stranding and Low Roar's popularity

edit

I think this article is worth mentioning how Kojima licensing their music picked them back from the edge of failure

https://www.vg247.com/2020/01/06/sony-wouldnt-even-tell-low-roar-music-death-stranding/ 194.79.209.94 (talk) 23:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Interesting! I've now mentioned it in the article. Thanks. Moozipan Cheese (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of House in the Woods (album) into Low Roar

edit

Coverage is very limited so far, and entirely from sources with unconfirmed reliability. What's here could easily fit in one or two paragraphs on the band's page for now, with an option to restore the article with more reliable coverage in the future. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

While I agree more reliable coverage will come with time, it seems fitting to have a dedicated page for this album as there are for the rest of their albums. Track listing and personnel information wouldn't be fitting on the main Low Roar article, and merging it now only to restore it later on would feel redundant. Additionally, binaural.es has been used in other Wikipedia articles to cover news on music, and as more information comes out for the album, in the very near future at that, more than enough coverage will make its way onto this page. MasonJSO (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Merge basic information (e.g., the album's anticipated release date and context regarding the vocalist's death), move this version to draftspace, and create a redirect to the band page. This article should be restored when it has been reviewed in three reliable, independent sources per the notability guideline for albums. The existence of other articles is not relevant to the notability of this article. Additionally, for a topic to be notable, there must be existing sources, not the assumption that those sources will eventually exist. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I also support draftification and everything else voorts says here. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply