Talk:Los Angeles metropolitan area
The contents of the Los Angeles metropolitan area page were merged into Greater Los Angeles on November 13, 2020 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This redirect is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Los Angeles metropolitan area redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is no need for the Los Angeles Metropolitan area page
editThere is no need for the Los Angeles Metropolitan area page. 75% of this is a copy of the greater Los Angeles area article. No other major city has any such division. Examples include New York, Chicago, Washington D.C, Boston, San Francisco and 99% percent of articles related to major cities in the United States. No other city has a separate article for the metropolitan area (MSA) and the Census statistical area (CSA) rather each major city has an article for the Primary census statistical area (PCSA). Cities which do not have a CSA like Phoenix only talk about the MSA where as cities with CSA's talk about both. Some cities like Philadelphia mention both the CSA and MSA but mainly discuss the region (Delaware Valley). In this case, the government classification of Los Angeles and Orange County as an MSA and the other counties in greater LA is insignificant and irrelevant and there should not be two articles. The relation Los Angeles and Orange county have with each other is actually less the relations Los Angeles has with other counties based on commuter statistics. This article should be remerged with the Greater Los Angeles Area article.
I am proposing the remerging of this article with the Greater Los Angeles Area Article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmabbas786 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support: Concur with merge proposal, most definitely. Ameriquedialectics 00:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support: but could this actually get done? Greengreengreenred 04:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support: They are pretty much coterminous. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 13:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support: for the reasons given above. Thomas.W (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC) (Who lived within the LA MSA for a few years but never heard anyone use other terms than "Greater LA" or just simply "LA")
Confusing map
editThis map is confusing because it implies that the urbanization between Los Angeles and San Diego is continuous but satellite images (such as Google maps) reveal that this is not the case. This map is also used on the Greater Los Angeles Area article.
Eopsid (talk) 12:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
I think there should be a brief section, one or two paragraphs, about the geography of the conurbation: the hill and mountain ranges that divide it, other physical boundaries, the various valleys, rivers, deserts, etc. Also a geographical map of the relief, with legends (preferably clickable) on the major features, would be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.1.219.184 (talk) 02:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Considering the topography of the area having a literally continuous urbanization between Los Angeles and San Diego would IMHO be a bit difficult. Thomas.W (talk) 19:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- The urbanization appears continuous on the map because the only break in the urbanization is Camp Pendleton and the Census Bureau treats military bases as urban. Kmusser (talk) 16:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Real estate values
editFour out of five areas of the Los Angeles Basin's housing markets continue to see rising values and home prices remain among the highest in the country: West L.A., Palos Verdes Peninsula, west San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel-Covina valleys and south Orange county including the beach cities. Despite the late 2000's and early 2010's recession period, the real estate market in those areas remain good and proves how valuable is it to live in the L.A. metro area and drew in more affluent people to move into the mentioned areas. 71.102.21.238 (talk) 05:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- I want to note suburban communities 20-30 miles from civic center or downtown LA are portrayed as poorer and mostly minority, but in reality, they are middle to upper-middle class and home to professionals who work in LA. The valleys (esp south and west San Fernando within city of LA, San Gabriel/Covina, and Simi/Conejo in Ventura county), beach cities like Santa Monica and Palos Verdes, and in Orange County: Anaheim, Santa Ana and Irvine are notably affluent. Parts of Long Beach and Pomona aren't really "ghetto" either, despite large minority (Black, Hispanic/Latino and Asian) populations. 67.49.89.214 (talk) 01:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Need a map, ASAP!
editIt is crazy to list every zip code (who cares!) but not provided a general map of the Los Angeles metro area. I came here because I was looking at a Wikipedia article about the "Gateway" cities, apparently this is a region of LA. But I come to the Los Angeles article and the LA Metro article and there is no information on the regions that make this area.
Some one who wants to know more about LA doesn't need to know zip codes or area codes. They know where cities are in relation to each other, what cities make up the Gateway or Southeast region? This basic resource should exist, you can find it more most countries and many counties and cities around the world. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 15:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Five or six 500 Fortune Companies?
editIn the section "Economy" there is written that the city is home to 5 Fortune 500 companies, while on the site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles#Economy it is stated, that it's six companies.217.99.206.97 (talk) 13:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Los Angeles metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223354/http://aapa.files.cms-plus.com/Statistics/WORLD PORT RANKINGS 2005.xls to http://aapa.files.cms-plus.com/Statistics/WORLD PORT RANKINGS 2005.xls
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081219193825/http://aapa.files.cms-plus.com/PDFs/2006_North_American_Container_Traffic.pdf to http://aapa.files.cms-plus.com/PDFs/2006_North_American_Container_Traffic.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Los Angeles metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130317045641/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/metro/totals/2012/index.html to https://www.census.gov/popest/data/metro/totals/2012/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130331204238/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2011/index.html to https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2011/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613000526/http://portoflosangeles.org/about/faqs.asp to http://www.portoflosangeles.org/about/faqs.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140628132422/http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/state_census_data_center/historical_census_1850-2010/view.php to http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/state_census_data_center/historical_census_1850-2010/view.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)