Talk:List of content syndication markup languages

major and minor

we should create and name some criterics for major/minor. newsml is very widly used in news-agenturs like dpa and reuters. rss and atom no discussion are major. lirs and hina-di are widley used in japan (article are prepared for publishing by me). shouldn't we put all in one cat? mabdul 0=* 21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree that opinions about what is "widely used" don't make it easy to divide formats into categories. One simple criterion for a major markup language is that it should be on Google's shortlist of "the most common file types." Atom and RSS are on that list; none of the others that you mention are on it.

I do not think we benefit Wikipedia users by "putting all in one category" --that is, by removing from this article the information that Atom and RSS are much more widely used and supported than other content-syndication markup languages. betsythedevine (talk) 02:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

opds

"the Open Publication Distribution System (OPDS) an application of the Atom Syndication Format intended to enable content creators and distributors to distribute digital books via a simple catalog format. This format is designed works interoperably across multiple desktop and device software programs for acquiring and consuming eBooks ("Reading Systems")." -- Draft spec with input from some major players; where does it belong? http://code.google.com/p/openpub/wiki/OPDS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.27.121.242 (talk) 20:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of content syndication markup languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060530210020/http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/index.html to http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)