This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
According to our Cash for Influence article, Lord Moonie was essentially acquitted in the "Cash for Influence" matter. Of the 4 Peers accused, 2 of them, Lord Truscott and Lord Taylor, were ultimately suspended from the House of Lords for a while, 1 of them, Lord Snape, was found by the sub-Committee to have expressed a willingness to break the rules, but later found by the Privileges Committee to not have done so. Only Lord Moonie was found by both groups to have not breached the code.
As a complete and total outsider to this topic, I am unsure that I could write this up precisely enough to include in this article. But currently, as compared to the other 3, Lord Moonie's acquittal is not given proper coverage, I think.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}