Talk:Kunihiko Ikuhara

Name change

So, Ikuni announced on his Twitter earlier today (March 31st, 00:00 JST) that he is changing his name from Kunihiko to Bonsoir. Given the proximity to April Fool's Day--which is globally observed, including in Japan--it's not exactly known if this is real or a joke. The article has already been edited to reflect the name change, but will it hold? -Velv (2022 March 30, 19:04 GMT)

It shouldn't per WP:COMMON NAME Sarcataclysmal (talk) 20:33, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

First response was in reference to the article title. As for the rest of the article, we'll see Sarcataclysmal (talk) 21:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

This might just be a stage name or media stunt? It looks like he's involved in a music project with Bonjour Suzuki and Teiko, where they're known as Teiko Bon Bon. lullabying (talk) 09:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kunihiko Ikuhara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161105135612/http://www.jrt.co.jp/yos/ikuniweb/index.htm to http://www.jrt.co.jp/yos/ikuniweb/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kunihiko Ikuhara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516190148/http://www.jrt.co.jp/yos/ikuniweb/ikuniweb_e/topmenu/etopmenu.html to http://www.jrt.co.jp/yos/ikuniweb/ikuniweb_e/topmenu/etopmenu.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060825044806/http://www.akadot.com/section.php?id=3&s=16 to http://www.akadot.com/section.php?id=3&s=16

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Yuri and the romantic line in the plot.

A: No. I'm still able to make a story where it's between a boy and a girl. But I feel irritated to see my girl getting together with some other guy. I've tried to kill off Tuxedo Mask in Sailor Moon many times. But no matter how many times I tried to kill him, he gets resurrected so I only get angrier. So I decided it would be way better if the girl just didn't have a boyfriend to begin with. Of course I'm just kidding. In reality, if I have a guy in the show, the love relationship gets to have a bigger role than the show. And that would be an interesting element, but I wouldn't want that to make that the scene-stealer of the show. Most other shoujo shows are in that direction. It's about who-and-who are getting together, or who-and-who are breaking up. I thought it would be a loss if that would be the big motif just because a girl was the main character. I think there could be more shows with other motives than that.

I deleted this line because it distorts the original phrase from the interview. Firstly, he directly rejected the idea of his ​​deliberately adding the yuri subtext besides the canonical yuri lpot, secondly, he explained this feeling by the fact that the romance in his opinion distracts from other topics in general. Thus, such a “quotation” not only distorts the original meaning, but also makes it meaninglessly homophobic, suggesting that yuri for some reason does not distract like the rest of the romance or supposedly is not even a full-fledged romanance in general. This is a distortion of the original text and I doubt that Ikuhara does not mean that yuri attracts a lot of attention / does not consider yuri a complete form of romance, so I delete this line. Solaire the knight (talk) 16:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)