Talk:John Patten, Baron Patten
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editI've moved the page because "Baron Patten" seems to be a better disambiguation than "UK Politician," for the former is actually a part of his title. -- Emsworth 00:58, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Record as Secretary of Education
editCurrently give only this: "Patten's record as education secretary has been described as "appalling" by David Hart, former general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers and major opponent during his time in office.[1]" Following the source I see that it is a throwaway line in a longer comment about Tory education secretaries. A throwaway line by a clear political opponent is therefore now the only assessment we have of the man's political career. Not good.
An ideal fix would be to expand the section on his time as Education Secretary. What policies did he implement? Who supported them, who opposed them? Which were regarded in the fullness of time as successes or failures, and by whom, and for what reasons?
I'm not deleting the line just yet, as I'd prefer we move towards that ideal fix. But I think that unless someone (including me) gets up the energy to do it the right way, leaving a biased entry like this is unfair, and we should remove the line. I'll do that later this week, if I don't get time to make some proper edits. (I might get the chance, on Wednesday.)--Jimbo Wales (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- There having been no response for several days, I've simply removed the line as incompatible with WP:BLP.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Patten, Baron Patten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926111446/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23737369-louise-patten-no-one-would-have-dared-ask-me-to-a-lapdancing-club.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23737369-louise-patten-no-one-would-have-dared-ask-me-to-a-lapdancing-club.do
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)