Talk:Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on January 9, 2017. The result of the discussion was delete. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | The contents of the Biden-Sanders Unity Task Forces page were merged into Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign on 31 December 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Length
editDue to length, I would like to consider implementing more summary style. This would apply, for example, to the Hunter Biden laptop material, which is entirely out of place and out of proportion to its overall significance, importance, and impact. I am considering trimming a lot of this as a result. Furthermore, it’s not even a real issue, it’s a manufactured controversy, and it should be given less prominence as a result. Viriditas (talk) 04:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps the Hunter Biden laptop material could be trimmed. The main article on the laptop seems to be pretty comprehensive. The section in the campaign article seems to want to leave the reader with the impression that there is good reason to think that the laptop was a Russian disinformation scheme, a claim which seems to have been conclusively refuted. As for the laptop matter being a manufactured controversy, I don't see the reasons to look at it that way. The laptop really did belong to Hunter Biden, and no evidence has emerged that anything on the laptop was inauthentic. GrinningBar69 (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
95.162.140.27 (talk) 16:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Plagiarized content warning
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 21:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)